https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/bedrock-openai-models
https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/bedrock-openai-models
Openai hasn't been publishing innovations for quite a while.
This paper isn't the exact same scenario, since it's an auditable open weight llama model, but shows the symptoms of this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.20247
We will see if this changes the equation, but it feels like OpenAI is pretty far behind and playing catch up on all fronts. Though to be honest, "pretty far behind" is like 2-8 weeks in the AI world, so it may not matter a ton, it's mostly perception. And for me and my information bubble, perception of OpenAI is rock-bottom due to Sam Altman. From appearing unethical to appearing unhinged with demands from fabs and everything else, I'm not a fan.
What OP is referring to is Anthropic aligning with corporate terms and conditions early, positioning themselves to be effectively resold by AWS rather than requiring orgs to procure them directly. This is huge in the enterprise world because the processes to get broad approval are generally far smaller and shorter for "just another AWS service" compared to a whole new vendor.
You can just run "air gapped" inference?
Is this only of interest to enterprise customers already on AWS (who want "air gapped" behavior)? Is there any other use case for this?
This will be more expensive than calling OpenAI directly, right?
But it also is for Devs in a company who already have a blanket agreement with Amazon, but would have an uphill battle signing an agreement with openAI.
throw03172019•1h ago
karmasimida•1h ago
https://x.com/amazon/status/2049178618639839427
dang•58m ago
Since the product doesn't seem to be available yet, and the other links are all press releases, we'll leave the interview up as the main link.