https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_(supercomputer)#Envir...
Edit: to the person who responded, I've been hit with the HN passive-aggressive "you're posting too fast" error. But as to your question:
I don't personally care about all the controversy surrounding Musk. But you must be living under a rock if you aren't aware that the left considers Musk right up there with Hitler these days. Primarily for aligning himself with Trump, but there's also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk_salute_controversy
Provide specific examples.
Now I have to avoid Claude too.
The fine-print-omission appears to be that weekly limits are not doubled. The progressive 5-hour rate limit shrinking was indeed an efficiency blocker that finally convinced me to cancel, but being only able to get 4 full sessions a week as opposed to 8 doesn't compell me to resubscribe.
Disgusting. For an allegedly not evil company, they’re very willing to pollute our night skies as well as partner up with a CEO who has been fanning the flames of extremism (particularly the emboldened racists / supremacists of the far right).
Which is kind of like the exception that proves the rule hahaha
People haven't been saying "GabeN can do no wrong" for awhile.
This is not a serious argument.
https://theconversation.com/a-million-new-spacex-satellites-...
FTA: "SpaceX has done a lot of engineering work to make its Starlink satellites fainter. They are still too bright for research astronomy, but thanks to new coatings, their brightness has not increased dramatically even as SpaceX has launched larger and larger satellites."
CEO that accelerated space industry by 10+ years
CEO that accelerated HCI industry by 10 years
Ok I guess, this was a bit of a hassle, but you're not increasing my weekly allowance, you're just not annoying me as often.
> Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts.
It wasn't a limit reduction (as in, I didn't have a lower 5-hour limit), it was "tokens are more expensive" and it ate my weekly limits faster. This should never have been instituted to begin with.
> Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably for Claude Opus models, as shown in the table below:
Meh.
This is why I don't care for all the "it's a subscription, you're free to not use it!" arguments here. It's not an all-you-can-eat subscription with some generous fair use limits, it's a "X tokens per month for $Y", and they keep lowering the X unilaterally and in secret.
Anthropic is either taking this space business more serious than the general public, or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute.
If it happens it happens, if not, it doesn't.
I want to be clear, I do think that one day something like that will exist, I just don't think it's anywhere close to being a reality, much like FSD.
Also it costs them, almost [0], nothing to say it and then later come up with some reason why they are no longer interested.
[0] Maybe a little bit of respect
Certainly an interesting day for xAI.
He literally did a Nazi salute on stage, twice! Check the video, and tell me what you see.
SpaceX/xAI also has Colossus 2, with double or more the GPUs
Seems xAI will still be around
htrp•1h ago
>The following three changes—all effective today—are aimed at improving the experience of using Claude for our most dedicated customers.
>First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans.
>Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts.
>Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably for Claude Opus models,
Looks like Elon's finally giving up on XAI and just selling the compute
JustSkyfall•59m ago
cyanydeez•58m ago
throwa356262•9m ago
But even then, I suspect their hands were tied in some areas because Elon had some expectations from his AI.
petercooper•34m ago
swalsh•4m ago
I'd run agents consuming hundreds of millions of tokens for less than a hundred dollars.
peder•23m ago
I don't think that's certain yet, but I do think that the open-source models like Gemma and Qwen are getting so good so fast that even Anthropic has real risk around the long-term value of their models and tooling.
Basically, if I'm Anthropic or xAI, I try to get revenue whenever and wherever possible and see what sticks. There's no value in playing for monopolistic control when everything is so volatile.
swalsh•7m ago
kingstnap•13m ago
I'm just speculating, but a particularly killer offering Elon wouldnt be able to refuse would be if Anthropic agreed to give them some training data / technology.
swalsh•6m ago