> McMahon also rejected the government’s argument that there was no constitutional problem because any viewpoint classification was ChatGPT’s doing, and not the government’s.
> “ChatGPT was the Government’s chosen instrument for purposes of this project, and DOGE’s use of AI to identify DEI-related material neither excuses presumptively unconstitutional conduct nor gives the Government carte blanche to engage in it,” she wrote.
java-man•1h ago
What will be the consequences?
boothby•1h ago
Administration decides the constitution doesn't spark joy, yeet
laughing_man•9m ago
The funding will be restored, assuming the decision survives an appeal.
sega_sai•9m ago
I am sure -- the government will appeal and the supreme court will decide it is all fine, because that's how founding fathers intended.
1659447091•1h ago
> “ChatGPT was the Government’s chosen instrument for purposes of this project, and DOGE’s use of AI to identify DEI-related material neither excuses presumptively unconstitutional conduct nor gives the Government carte blanche to engage in it,” she wrote.