6x the price of 3.1 flash lite
Edit: Never mind.
Compare to the GPT-5.5 announcement: https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-5/
They continue to focus on smaller models while openai and anthropic are increasing compute requirements for their SOTA models.
They are just refining their current models while they finish training the next generation.
They will all come out at about the same time. Anthropic, OpenAi, Google, xAI
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/ori...
Google employees, perhaps nudge folks in the org to fix this bug?
> Create animated SVG of a frog on a boat rowing through jungle river. Single page self contained HTML page with SVG
3.5 Flash: Thinking Medium - 7516 tokenshttps://gistpreview.github.io/?5c9858fd2057e678b55d563d9bff0...
3.5 Flash: Thinking High - 7280 tokens
https://gistpreview.github.io/?1cab3d70064349d08cf5952cdc165...
3.1 Pro - 28,258 tokens
https://gistpreview.github.io/?6bf3da2f80487608b9525bce53018...
Though 3.1 took 3 minutes of thinking to generate, but it only one that got animated movement.
Gemini 3.5 Flash: $0.75 input / $4.50 output per 1M tokens, 1M context window. The output price explicitly "includes thinking tokens" — which is why it's higher than a typical flash-class model.
For comparison within the Gemini lineup: - Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.30 / $2.50 - Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 / $1.50 - Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: $2.00 / $12.00
So 3.5 Flash is ~2.5x more expensive input vs 2.5 Flash. The pricing and "including thinking tokens" framing position it as a reasoning-capable flash model rather than just a pure speed optimization.
Feels like the AI pricing noose is tightening sooner rather than later.
alexdns•28m ago
nerdalytics•7m ago