Wow. Not sure what I actually read or saw here, but I guess the title was accurate.
As a side note, I find this style of writing really strange. It’s like the author is trying hard to look avant garde. But it comes off as trying too hard, because words like “adore” are not typically used in this way or for these kinds of controversial topics:
> I want to make this clear: it is incredibly based for a disabled artist to create art about their intense, codependent, ambiguously sexual relationship with their support animal who shared their daily life and body more than most humans ever will. This is a level of consent discourse that humanity as a whole will not be ready for for another three hundred generations of internet discourse, and they're just going ahead and cracking that nut wide open. I adore this.
SilverElfin•9m ago
As a side note, I find this style of writing really strange. It’s like the author is trying hard to look avant garde. But it comes off as trying too hard, because words like “adore” are not typically used in this way or for these kinds of controversial topics:
> I want to make this clear: it is incredibly based for a disabled artist to create art about their intense, codependent, ambiguously sexual relationship with their support animal who shared their daily life and body more than most humans ever will. This is a level of consent discourse that humanity as a whole will not be ready for for another three hundred generations of internet discourse, and they're just going ahead and cracking that nut wide open. I adore this.