Another reason why I will be buying Anthropic shares after they IPO.
I don't see them as just an AI company, they are a cybersecurity powerhouse too.
Will likely give them time to expand capacity as well. And make them harder to dislodge in these orgs.
If society can't trust banks and other institutions to safely control their data, what follows ?
Do we we collectivelly switch off the internet?
They seem pretty close, in both average and "best run" scores. And, in a highly verifiable domain, "best run" or best@n is what you're looking for.
I mean most nasdaq tech companies would be in 13+ countries, why are they writing this like it's a big number, is hilariously small?
I don't think they're trying to flex this as a large number. They don't want to give an exact number, as that may change etc / is fuzzy, but also want to give you an idea of the scale.
They say "In the future, we intend to expand our geographical reach much further". I imagine this commentary is somewhat related to the concerns that AI will create an even worse "global underclass". AI developments are first accessible to Americans, then allies, and then later the whole world.
The only trend Mythos continues is Anthropic’s trend of warning that disaster is always 6 to 12 months away.
I'm afraid that the usual mantra that "we just need more scale" that worked well for attracting investments, is not working anymore - bigger models provide marginal improvements while naturally get much more expensive to run.
Is this why both Anthropic and OpenAI are rushing for IPOs this year?
Security wise, it's about being able to find and chain multiple vulnerabilities to actually create viable exploits.
So I would imagine that if you were using it for regular software development you may not feel that it's that different unless used in a particular way?
philipwhiuk•43m ago