What happens to the (slightly warmer) water after it has been used? Is there a way we could return it in a way to minimise impact? I.e if we extract ground water should we inject it back into the ground? Would that even matter?
In the end I have a feeling that the most efficient solution will most likely be to just increase the price of water during a drought. People will complain but it won't be long before the big consumers will happily adjust their consumption or move to an area with abundant water.
I'm sorry, what? "Palantir" wasn't bad enough?
Anyway this is silly propaganda as usual. USA gets through over 300B gallons daily. Irrigation alone is over 100B of that. Most of that goes to corn for animal feed. You're not allowed to get all high and mighty about AI water use if you still eat meat.
What is the origin of this rule? What is the enforcement mechanism?
From a quick search I gather that US citizens' daily use is around 300B gallons https://watercalculator.org/footprint/how-united-states-uses...
I was just curious of the number and scale.
There is plenty of bad stuff in the world it seems silly to invent new things to be upset about unless they are actually happening.
Unfortunately, ragebaiting about this specific issue is very lucrative.
1,000,000 acres * 1,629,250 gallons per acre = 1.629 trillion gallons of water. That’s just California.
(The number in the article doesn't specify whether data center water usage is just us-bound or global)
ChrisGreenHeur•1h ago
uxhacker•57m ago
minimaxir•46m ago