I read HN every day but kept hitting the same issue: the most valuable stuff usually isn't in the linked article, it's buried in the comments. The engineering manager explaining what actually happened internally before the layoffs. The trader explaining why "energy independence" is a myth. The defense analyst who knows why the stockpiles are empty. That signal is there every day, scattered across thousands of comments in 30 front-page posts, and I never had time to dig through all of it.

So I built HN Debrief (https://hndebrief.com) to solve my problem. At the end of each day (UTC) it: - fetches the previous day's front page - picks the threads that generated a discussion worth reading and tries to surface comments (or group of comments) with the most insight - finds comments that cut against the threads majority opinion as a balance lever - pulls out the links people shared into a reference section and summarizes the rest Every insight is attributed to its author with a link back to the original comment

Feedback I'd especially value: thread and comment selection (am I picking the right discussions and comments?) and whether the "against the grain" comments are actually insightful or just contrarian. There's a daily email also if you want it.