frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

A line-by-line translation of the OCaml runtime from C to Rust

https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/a-line-by-line-translation-of-the-ocaml-runtime-from-c-to-rust/18247
2•bwuno•2m ago•0 comments

Making Semgrep rip: How Ripgrep inspired us to shave hours off (some) scans

https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/making-semgrep-rip-how-ripgrep-inspired-us-to-shave-hours-off-some-...
2•bkettle•2m ago•0 comments

I'm a product manager. My code merges without an engineer reading the diff

https://nextwaveoftech.com/posts/code-merges-without-reading-the-diff
1•theanonymousone•3m ago•0 comments

Steve Jobs responds to question about artificial intelligence, IDCA, 1983 [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkzGtGzXIEc
1•evo_9•4m ago•0 comments

The unwritten laws of software engineering

https://newsletter.manager.dev/p/the-unwritten-laws-of-software-engineering
1•birdculture•9m ago•0 comments

A Twist in Ukraine's Drone Campaign Is 'Hurting the Russians'

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/world/europe/ukraine-midrange-logistics-strikes.html
3•JumpCrisscross•9m ago•0 comments

Apple Made a Sports App That Does Almost Nothing. It's Incredible

https://slate.com/technology/2026/06/fifa-world-cup-apple-app-sports.html
3•ForHackernews•10m ago•0 comments

The Analog Thing – Analog Computing for the Future

https://the-analog-thing.org
3•jensgk•12m ago•0 comments

Life on the edge of Musk's Starbase brings fortunes and fractures

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/musks-starbase-rise-spacex-brings-fortunes-fra...
1•JumpCrisscross•12m ago•0 comments

A whale necropolis has been found

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01581-x
1•tigerlily•13m ago•0 comments

Should we care any more about Googlebot crawling our sites?

https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/web/DoYouNeedGooglebotCrawling
1•speckx•13m ago•0 comments

Splunk Enterprise PostgreSQL sidecar has no auth (CVE-2026-20253, CVSS 9.8)

https://hellorecon.com/blog/cve-2026-20253
2•slvnx•14m ago•0 comments

The Abundance Illusion

https://www.carlyle.com/carlyle-compass/the-abundance-illusion
2•cwal37•14m ago•0 comments

A strong, reversible, and conformal adhesive gel for diverse plants

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adz6379
1•PaulHoule•15m ago•0 comments

Quick: An internal hosting platform for the AI era

https://shopify.engineering/quick
1•okneil•15m ago•0 comments

Dao Heart v3.14

https://github.com/Mankirat47/Dao-Heart-v3.14
1•Mankirat47•16m ago•0 comments

Microsoft.UI.Reactor: A declarative, component-based C# framework for WinUI apps

https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-reactor
2•therloux•16m ago•0 comments

A Love Story

https://pudding.cool/2026/06/love-story/
2•gmays•19m ago•0 comments

Sprinklz.io – An RSS reader with powerful algorithmic controls

https://sprinklz.io
1•sammy0910•21m ago•0 comments

Please remove mole.fit references and original UI design from this project

https://github.com/caezium/Burrow/issues/36
2•tamnd•23m ago•0 comments

Anthropic CEO Says Government Should Be Able to Block New Models

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/anthropic-ceo-says-government-should-be-able-t...
6•01-_-•24m ago•1 comments

Show HN: I am building a map of people who lived in the Roman Empire

https://new.roman-names.com/
1•metiscus•24m ago•0 comments

Why the $55B acquisition of Electronic Arts isn't your usual leveraged buyout

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/why-the-55bn-acquisition-of-electronic-arts-isnt-your-usual-leverag...
2•speckx•25m ago•0 comments

Canada parliament passes cybersecurity bill amid privacy concerns

https://www.jurist.org/news/2026/06/canada-parliament-passes-cybersecurity-bill-amid-privacy-conc...
3•devonnull•25m ago•0 comments

C47/R47 Calculators

https://47calc.com/index.html
2•helterskelter•25m ago•0 comments

If you build apps with AI tools, this is .uh concerning

https://substack.com/profile/173863161-dan-cochran/note/c-274040959
2•deecodameeko•28m ago•0 comments

Eyes on Flock: Flock Safety Transparency Data Aggregation

https://eyesonflock.com/
1•jupr•29m ago•0 comments

Architecture of Autonomous Operations

https://autonomousagents19.com/how-it-works
1•KissMySaas•31m ago•0 comments

Dynamic ReACT Loop with Conductor

https://conductor-oss.github.io/conductor/devguide/ai/dynamic-workflows.html
2•opiniateddev•31m ago•0 comments

Ring-0 AI Interview Copilot

https://aceloop.ai/
1•rosadoft•31m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: Did Anthropic Just Win?

2•lnenad•1h ago
Not trying to cause drama, I feel the title is a bit too much but it's 100% how I feel. I'm genuinely curious what others think. I know there are a lot of people with more knowledge and info than me so I thought here is a good place to ask.

Personally how I see it, benchmarks aside, Fable really is a tier above both Opus and Codex. Still makes mistakes, still needs supervision, but much less, and with a good feedback loop is able to achieve a lot independently. If OpenAI had something tucked away, they'd have probably already released it, right? I'm worried as this big of a difference means that we're probably going to speed towards a big price increase, at least until some competitors catch up. But if Anthropic really just built a moat and they don't slow down, the market is going to be much different, and the price of frontier model(s) will follow. Even if you want to go for open source, having enough power to run 1T param models means a non trivial investment for many companies out there.

Comments

re-thc•1h ago
No, I'd wager the opposite.

If Anthropic "won" they'd not 2x the price as well as potentially lock it out of monthly plans. Opus is already on the pricier side. Sonnet hasn't been updated in a long while. Haiku is even worse.

Right now, the only thing this gains is Anthropic has a better model but at 2-5x the cost. Is it worth it? That's not "winning". That's a tradeoff.

lnenad•1h ago
But even if 10x the price the value is there. Fable needs to loop less, spending less tokens, and is going to be much more correct so the price increase isn't a straightforward evaluation.
re-thc•1h ago
> the value is there

I'm not saying there's no value. Just like there's expensive tea and cheap tea. The expensive tea doesn't "win" though, which in this context is referring to defeating all the competitors like a >50% marketshare scenario.

And it's not like everyone is sitting still. Every competitor is evolving rapidly. Whether it is ability or pricing.

lnenad•1h ago
I'm saying it's not expensive tea if you have to drink more of the cheap tea to get the ~same effect.

That's why I'm posting this, my expectation (based on previous behavior) is that there should be a response from OpenAI. Considering it's missing I'm worried there's some secret sauce that others are missing.

re-thc•42m ago
> I'm saying it's not expensive tea if you have to drink more of the cheap tea to get the ~same effect.

You don't need 1000s of architects to build a building.

Just like companies don't have everyone as staff engineers.

IF as I explained this was the mid-level engineer (on price) beating every existing staff engineer by miles, then that's winning.

This is not.

> That's why I'm posting this, my expectation (based on previous behavior)

In history, it is still within the time range that OpenAI has reacted and released a new model, so no, nothing new.

lnenad•38m ago
It's not a valid point imho as your paying for tokens, not hours, per token value is much more important and the purpose of getting more lower value tokens does not exist (unless for a fraction of the price to get to the same result). But it's fine if you feel differently.

Yeah, I'm rooting for this otherwise we're in for a rough ride in the next couple of months.

uberman•1h ago
I thought this was going to be about: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-...
yaodub•1h ago
On capability, yeah. On pricing, they just told most developers they're not the target anymore.
yaodub•1h ago
Sure, but you're paying the higher rate just to find out if that's true for your use case.