I understand why local, I don't understand why Claude Code. Is it better than the other harnesses?
I thought the main reason for using Claude Code was that it was the only harness one was allowed to use with the Claude subscription plan...
msradam•46m ago
The inertia of switching. At least for me, being able to maintain the same UX and configuration for agentic coding is a benefit. I have access to internal models at work where I use a LiteLLM proxy with Claude Code, so no Anthropic models, but I can maintain the same .claude between personal and work machines. Though I'm definitely open to a non-Anthropic harness if it's a clear win.
har-ki•8m ago
Yes!! And your LiteLLM-proxy-to-internal-models setup is a cleaner setup than mine.
har-ki•10m ago
Fair question. I haven’t benchmarked it against other harnesses, so I can’t say it’s better.
My reason for using claude code is continuity - I use it for dev (it’s also the tool of choice for most people I work with), and it already has the context. And it supports both frontier and OSS models.
corporealshift•1h ago
i don't understand why people would ever want to read this kind of article. The information is ok, but it's a regurgitation of many sources, some of it incorrect, covered in ai slop prose.
Please share the cool thing you're doing in a blog post, but don't have AI write it for you; it's hard to read and doesn't respect the reader
tasuki•1h ago
I thought the main reason for using Claude Code was that it was the only harness one was allowed to use with the Claude subscription plan...
msradam•46m ago
har-ki•8m ago
har-ki•10m ago
My reason for using claude code is continuity - I use it for dev (it’s also the tool of choice for most people I work with), and it already has the context. And it supports both frontier and OSS models.