If it only amplifies half the effect, I don’t think TFA is an accurate claim.
Yeah we know that LLMs tend towards sycophancy.
Discussing DK has a real Matthew 7:3-5 vibe about it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45876744 - "LLMs are steroids for your Dunning-Kruger" (bytesauna.com)
392 points | 7 months ago | 301 comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45851483 - "AI is Dunning-Kruger as a service" (christianheilmann.com)
268 points | 7 months ago | 199 comments
Definitely is.
steve_adams_86•24m ago
The phenomenon of correcting people because Chat Gippity said x or y was the beginning. Now people repeat what the machine said as though it originated from them, and this has been totally normalized. It permeates everything. People feel empowered by it, but they have no intent or ability to verify. This is normal. It's another source of information, but it's vetted by probability at best, yet also misinterpreted and internalized at worst.
People plagiarize and behave as though it's their own work with total confidence and no shame whatsoever. Speaking to teachers about this is mind-blowing. This is very real and present. These people believe they're doing 'the work' in many cases. Some are aware it's a farce, many are not.
It has jammed a lever into D-K and cranked it up into something even worse, in my opinion.