Is it because he isn't actually using the technology for work on a day-to-day basis like a lot of us?
This has been the definition of finance for hundreds of years. I don't know why it comes across here like this is a new phenomenon.
Edit: the article that the author is commenting on is IMO much better than the linked commentary. There's not much to it
civilian•52m ago
I expect Cory to have skepticism about technology that can be exploited for dystopian purposes, but calling AI "the world's money-losingest technology" is out of touch. If AI can support/replace some intellectual work, it'll be revolutionary, and that's what the investment bet is about.
I get that the blog post is making a separate point about Musk's companies but it's dissapointing to see mistakes like this in Cory's thinking
bayarearefugee•48m ago
In what way is it out of touch or wrong? It is objectively correct today.
It may very well not be correct 2 years from now, but his statement was about the present, not the future.
MaysonL•44m ago
ZionBoggan•35m ago
ggm•23m ago
AGI isn't happening. So, it's incremental improvements on LLM and Generative methods. Any advance which requires more tech inputs demands more capital. Any advance which requires less tech makes all the existing capex look stupid.
amanaplanacanal•41m ago
lukol•35m ago
yes, it's risky and investment-heavy but it's not a bottomless pit with no path to break even. there are many other recent technologies - NFTs? data centers in space? - that would be a better fit for this label.
projektfu•4m ago
pfraze•18m ago
Obviously the investment expense has been extremely high, which is what the replies are quibbling about.
nelsonfigueroa•14m ago
That's one big "If". From personal experience AI just tends to burn money. Time will tell if the investment pays off but I disagree that, at this time, it is out of touch to say AI is a money sink.