frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Cloudflare is quietly building the agent cloud

https://remkusdevries.com/cloudflare-is-quietly-building-the-agent-cloud/
2•taubek•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A free book on the psychology behind product design

https://productdesignpsychology.com
2•wdeb•1m ago•0 comments

Uber-backed Lime seeks up to $1.66B valuation in US IPO

https://www.reuters.com/business/uber-backed-lime-aims-raise-up-1809-million-us-ipo-2026-06-22/
2•herpderperator•1m ago•0 comments

FreeBSD 15.1 Released with Updated WiFi Drivers, Better C23 Support

https://www.phoronix.com/news/FreeBSD-15.1-Released
2•ksec•1m ago•0 comments

Grand Unified Theory:Cosmic Philosophical Conjecture(Explanation:Time Dimension)

https://medium.com/@f9121212/grand-unified-theory-cosmic-philosophical-conjecture-explanation-uni...
2•ortrich•2m ago•0 comments

Tw-fade: pure CSS scroll-driven edge masking

https://pete.design/tw-fade
2•petekp•2m ago•1 comments

The FBI's 22,000 square-foot technical training environment in Huntsville

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/inside-the-fbis-kinetic-cyber-range
2•sjreese•2m ago•1 comments

Testing Isn't Everything (2019)

https://www.arp242.net/testing.html
2•dryarzeg•4m ago•0 comments

What's New in Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU 93

https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris/whats-new-in-oracle-solaris-11-4-sru-93
2•ksec•4m ago•0 comments

Study finds no clear advantage for trans women over cisgender women in sports

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/60/3/198
5•startupfreak•6m ago•0 comments

Good Riddance, Tim

https://medium.com/@Themetris/good-riddance-tim-e4b60ea55dd5
2•ra0x3•6m ago•0 comments

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids' use of social media restored

https://apnews.com/article/social-media-parental-consent-ohio-eef2f173956e37183a39f13790bca96b
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•10m ago•0 comments

OpenPlan – Waze for AI Agents

https://openplan.cc
2•vncsleal•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: PMB – local-first memory for AI coding agents over MCP

https://github.com/oleksiijko/pmb/blob/main/README.md
4•oleksiibond•11m ago•2 comments

Greater Switzerland [pdf]

https://isonomiaquarterly.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/iq-4.2-summer-2026-nientiedt-greater-swi...
2•brandonlc•11m ago•0 comments

Tailwind CSS adds more complexity than it removes

https://tinamrak.com/blog/tailwind-css-adds-more-complexity-than-it-removes
2•f13th•12m ago•1 comments

Miguel de Icaza pitches opt-in crash telemetry for Godot Engine [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zqjiRuhQLE
1•roflcopter69•13m ago•0 comments

Real-Time Feedback: My Closing Move in Every Interview

https://mgrebler.substack.com/p/real-time-feedback-my-closing-move
2•mooreds•14m ago•0 comments

codex-fixes: Community-maintained fixes for OpenAI Codex bugs

https://codexfixes.com/
2•cl3misch•14m ago•0 comments

Companies are scrambling to curtail soaring AI costs

https://www.economist.com/business/2026/06/14/companies-are-scrambling-to-curtail-soaring-ai-costs
3•1vuio0pswjnm7•14m ago•0 comments

The last Romans are still around

https://signoregalilei.com/2026/06/20/the-last-romans-are-still-around/
2•surprisetalk•14m ago•0 comments

Xfwl4's First Preview Release

https://www.spurint.org/journal/2026/06/xfwl4s-first-preview-release
2•Tomte•15m ago•0 comments

X down for users globally, Downdetector shows

https://www.reuters.com/business/x-down-thousands-us-users-downdetector-shows-2026-06-22/
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•17m ago•0 comments

GentleOS: A Hobby Operating System for Vintage PCs

https://www.adamsdesk.com/posts/gentleos-vintage-pc-operating-system/
1•black6•17m ago•0 comments

'Don't Die,' Ballerina Farm and the theology of self-optimization

https://www.ncronline.org/culture/dont-die-ballerina-farm-and-theology-self-optimization
1•bookofjoe•17m ago•0 comments

A copyright law quirk may let Lord British reclaim Ultima from EA

https://www.destructoid.com/it-seems-a-copyright-law-quirk-will-finally-let-lord-british-reclaim-...
2•evo_9•18m ago•0 comments

Leipzig accuses conductor of inappropriate conduct

https://slippedisc.com/2026/06/breaking-leipzig-accuses-conductor-of-inappropriate-conduct/
1•Tomte•18m ago•0 comments

Google is investing around $75M in 'Backrooms' studio A24

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/google-investing-in-backrooms-studio-a24-e7585ebe
3•logickkk1•18m ago•0 comments

DHL Set to Transport Goods on New Wind-Powered Cargo Ships

https://www.wsj.com/pro/sustainable-business/dhl-set-to-transport-goods-on-new-wind-powered-cargo...
5•julienchastang•18m ago•0 comments

I built Ponytrail, a local audit trail for AI coding-agent edits

https://github.com/0xroylee/ponytrail
8•1997roylee•19m ago•3 comments
Open in hackernews

Pledging Another $400k to the Zig Software Foundation

https://mitchellh.com/writing/zig-donation-2026
277•tosh•1h ago

Comments

ksdme9•1h ago
It must be pretty satisfying to be able to throw that kind of money at stuff you admire.
cyber_kinetist•1h ago
I really do not understand how people talk about "Being rich / being a billionaire will make you fundamentally unhappy". Damn if I had all the money I have so many good-willed projects I want to throw money at!
Daishiman•1h ago
Because the most vocal rich people in this age seem to have an unusual lack of empathy and just being able to enjoy themselves.
InsideOutSanta•50m ago
Yeah, I think people have the correlation backward. I suspect that driven people are more likely to get rich and less likely to be happy, so there seem to be a lot of angry rich dudes.

Meanwhile, people who get rich by accident often seem able to improve their own lives and those of others with their money. The recent article about the founder of Craigslist comes to mind.

toomuchtodo•45m ago
Nailed it.
yard2010•33m ago
I wonder what is better, for people, for society, having many rich angry people or having many poor angry people?
InsideOutSanta•27m ago
How about let's aim for neither ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
IshKebab•59m ago
Yeah I feel the same about people who say they wouldn't know what to do when they retire. I have so many projects! I guess we are just different...
darren0•51m ago
It will not make you unhappy. It will just not make you happy. Big difference. The saying "money can't buy happiness" is in fact true no matter how much people want to rationalize the opposite.
Herbstluft•42m ago
What that always leaves out, however, is that no/little money can very much cause a lot of unhappiness.
bluGill•18m ago
The amount of money to get over that hump is small. Many people in poverty are happy. If you are at the very bottom with not enough to eat and such money can buy happiness, but you can be below the poverty line and still be about as happy as everyone.
SoftTalker•2m ago
This is a lie that people with money tell themselves to make themselves feel better about not giving away more of their money (ironically, proving themselves correct).
wnevets•41m ago
> The saying "money can't buy happiness" is in fact true no matter how much people want to rationalize the opposite.

I'm willing to test this theory out, send me some money.

neuralkoi•39m ago
A recent example: https://vinay.sh/i-am-rich-and-have-no-idea-what-to-do-with-...
genxy•45m ago
The kinds of people that become billionaires are not those who are happy, the hole in their sole is why they are billionaires in the first place. Yes there are exceptions, just like with everything.

You should probably have a billion dollars, you would do great things. But you probably shouldn't become a billionaire to get there. Being rich doesn't make one unhappy, but getting there does.

That relentless grind changes a person, much like the ring.

I echo the sentiment in this comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630565

thomascountz•42m ago
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy less unhappiness. There's diminishing returns, of course, but I'd hazard it looks a bit like ln(n), in that the returns are quite significant in the beginning.
tsunamifury•40m ago
And the remaining unhappinesses can end up in starker relief, as you continuously try to remove all unhappinesses from your life to nearly impossible and sometimes distorted degrees.

The problem isn’t that money doesn’t buy happiness, it’s that it can remove your ability to endure the necessary amounts of unhappiness in life.

the_mitsuhiko•38m ago
Money can very much buy happiness. Most of the things that make you unhappy can be remedied with money. How much money you need to accomplish that depends though.
Mond_•26m ago
> Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy less unhappiness

> Money can very much buy happiness. Most of the things that make you unhappy can be remedied with money

Was it too hard to read beyond the first comma?

cortesoft•22m ago
The person you are replying to agrees that money can get rid of things that cause unhappiness. The point is that removing unhappiness is only part of what creates happiness, and money can’t buy the other part.
sph
jmull•22m ago
Being rich doesn’t make you unhappy.

But spending your life pursuing an unsatisfiable goal (because the goal is “more”) probably isn’t good for your happiness.

Not to mention, there are very satisfying ways to contribute to things you think are important that don’t necessarily involve a lot of money.

epolanski•8m ago
Yet most wealthy people don't act like that.

The wealthiest man on the planet looks to be quite miserable, insecure and bitter most of the time.

sph•28m ago
You can 'throw' what you can afford and it will feel as satisfying. Just try it.
dwroberts•19m ago
Seems obvious the parent comment was making a point about how much money it is and not just whether it feels nice to donate money. 400k can go a long way
alchemist1e9•18m ago
Try to purge envy from your heart. It’s a poison.
sevenzero•9m ago
In a working society, nobody should be able to throw away life changing money. Being rich is poisonous to society. Most of us suffer due to people hoarding money and humanity needs to overcome the concept of money generally.
MyHonestOpinon•1m ago
I don't feel the parent post is about bad envy. There is also good envy, when you feel happy for someone's blessings. But you also would like to have it for yourself.
asimovDev•12m ago
i don't think my bank will let me withdraw 400k in cash with the reasoning of "I want to throw it"
allknowingfrog•1h ago
I really appreciate the "it's okay to be weird" sentiment. It has never been easier to try out a crazy idea. We may as well embrace it and try to learn something.
throwaw12•1h ago
I read it as a pledge to continue doing non-AI-LLM-slop work. End result could be interesting for everyone, on one side project with no-LLM policy and on the other side projects which heavily rely on LLMs.

In the short term we might not see the benefits, this pledge reads like: "Please keep doing what you are doing now, I am interested in how far it goes" (not in any negative sense)

hylaride•1h ago
If I ever get "fuck you" money like Mitchell did, I plan to use his post-money life as an inspiration to "retire".
osigurdson•1h ago
Zig is really nice. I enjoy using it a lot. Glad to hear that it is getting a little more funding.
hresvelgr•1h ago
Another language that is in a similar space to Zig that I think deserves more attention, particularly for funding is Odin. While I think Zig is a great language, there is a consistency of design and simplicity to Odin that makes low-level programming more ergonomic and enjoyable to me. While Zig boasts a lot of impressive projects, Odin was used to build the JangaFX suite[1].

[1] https://jangafx.com/

mi_lk•1h ago
Nothing more beautiful when game recognizes game.
colesantiago•1h ago
Doesn't this prove that Mitchell Hashimoto is probably the only "good billionaire"?

I thought all billionaires were bad?

sigzero•59m ago
I am sure there are some bad billionaires. That moniker is used to demonize them for the most part.
InsideOutSanta•47m ago
I guess it depends on exactly what you're talking about, but my impression is that the primary "billionaires are bad" argument is simply that a system that allows billionaires to exist is inherently broken. A system that rewards people based on their actual contributions would not allow billionaires to exist.

The fact that some billionaires use their money to do good does not contradict that argument.

hylaride•37m ago
It's because you only hear about the loud ones. There are lots doing good work.

In particular Lauren Bezos and Laurene Powell Jobs.

Warren Buffet is essentially bequeathed the majority of his wealth to good causes.

A lot of the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation is phenomenal (despite the recent and disturbing Epstein news).

George Soros has funded a lot of good causes, depending on how far you want to believe the conspiracy theories.

Harris Rosen funded free daycares and university tuition to benefit an impoverished Orlando community.

Dolly Parton's philanthropy is legendary.

A lot of the Robber barons (Andrew Carnegie, Rockefeller's) bequeathed to causes that Americans are still benefiting from today.

Yvon Chouinard, Founder of Patagonia, pretty much gave the company away for environmental causes.

Chuck Feeney pretty much gave away 99% of his wealth.

teekert•1h ago
Adults responding in adult ways. Respect.
qudat•1h ago
Major props to Mitchell (and his family) for these donations.
Imustaskforhelp•1h ago
> I use AI heavily. I've written about my AI adoption journey and shipping real features with AI assistance. I'm also quite vocal about remaining rational about its capabilities and frustrated with its negative impacts on open source.

> The point is that I have opinions. Those opinions don't fully align with ZSF's approach. And yet, I have nothing but respect for ZSF: the people, the policies, and the project. Part of what makes the internet and open source great is that projects can be weird and different. They can set unusual boundaries, build their own culture, and pursue quality in ways that won't make sense to everyone.

Mitchell does feel like the adult in the room when other people are having chain-saws and acting irrationally for a lack of better term (for example jared/bun controversy which the post just somewhat touches on)

(Mitchell's tweet about AI psychosis is genuinely influential and is now a pointer to what this phenomenon might be)

I really think him and simon's opinions are somehow decently nuanced opinions on AI that the internet has to offer.

Now glazing of mitchell aside, I am happy that zig foundation gets such amount of money and I am really excited that Zig an independent language is able to get the level of love that it does.

There is a famous talk by the creator of Elm on the economics of independent programming languages and how its hard for them to get sponsored if they aren't already working at a company (Rust was created at Mozilla, Golang was created by Google)

This is a real issue that is true for most of open-source and I am just happy that we are atleast moving slowly towards some good as well. Its an uphill battle with multiple lows but I am happy for the positive changes as it gets as open source does have a special place in my heart as it taught me about privacy and many of your hearts as well.

GodelNumbering•51m ago
I have been experimenting with modifying Ghostty lately. It's a well attended codebase and a pleasure to work with, props to Mitchell.

Since Ghostty is written in Zig, I ended up adding native Zig AST support in Dirac (https://github.com/dirac-run/dirac/blob/master/src/services/...)

One thing the has been a little unintuitive is the pattern of all code and tests in single files, which makes the filesizes grow much larger. Also if you're coming from inheritance supported languages, Zig forces a different way of thinking

trizoza•51m ago
What a word of wisdom right there, the bit about internet is beautiful because it's ok to be weird - this is often the opposite on twitter, fb, reddit and many discords where if you have a different opinion you get mobbed by angry comments making one feel worse about their own weirdness.
walthamstow•47m ago
I'm not in the OSS world much so hopefully someone can help me understand: what does 700k buy you in OSS language development?
randusername•38m ago
https://ziglang.org/news/2025-financials
hiccuphippo•35m ago
In the case of Zig, You can see their financial reports here:

https://ziglang.org/news/2025-financials/

Most of it goes to contributors.

alper•15m ago
Who are paid at a steady and relatively decent rate. That's cool.
Lerc•36m ago
It's great to be in a position to do this, however I'm beginning to think that their greater contribution is ghostty

I don't really know how to value things any more when I see someone develop a tool that is kind-of useful that then gets acquired for half a billion dollars. As someone with a decent number of decades of terminal hopping, the improvement that ghostty has brought a breath of fresh air. To me it has represented more utility that a few of those acquisitions.

cute_boi•16m ago
I have been using zig and it is so much better. I am thankful they are avoiding vibe slop in compilers.
tadasv•15m ago
This is great IMO. I like zig as a language and the idea behind it. But boy, it has a syntax issue. I with they figure out better syntax before 1.0, developer ergonomics I think are as important.
n42•12m ago
https://matklad.github.io/2025/08/09/zigs-lovely-syntax.html
lukaslalinsky•7m ago
Zig has multiple issues, but syntax is definitely not it. It might take a little bit of time getting used to, if you are coming from another language, but it's one of the most readable languages I've ever worked with.
mawadev•13m ago
I love this guy
jaypatelani•4m ago
I would gladly donate this much to NetBSD foundation.
Hendrikto•29m ago
> Everything feels like a side quest, but not in an inspiring way. I don’t have the same base desires driving me to make money or gain status. I have infinite freedom, yet I don’t know what to do with it

What a hyper-capitalist statement. You are living a sad life if money and status is all that is driving you.

This person is free to do what they like. Family, friends, hobbies, philanthropy, … But apparently they have been stuck in a hamster wheel, chasing money and status their whole life, without ever stopping to think what they actually want or like, what is important to them.

corndoge•24m ago
Point and laugh at the man who is honest about what he feels
Semaphor•21m ago
OTOH, that’s probably how they got rich, and why I’ll never be.
Lariscus•19m ago
The whole section about him working for DOGE to "embark on a journey to save our government" tells you everything you need to know about him.
j1elo•21m ago
I mean, the answer is so obviously in front of our faces right now... :-)

Use the free time to learn some Zig! And start a life of happily giving back powerful and useful GPL software to put your own 2 cents on the mountain of society building blocks that allowed you to thrive in such a way to begin with.

fps-hero•6m ago
People conflate the ideas of happiness, and comfort. Money buys access to increasing levels of comfort, but comfort becomes normalized very quickly. Once you've become accustomed to a certain level of comfort, the luxury of it wears off and it becomes a new norm. You also have an expectation to, at a minimum, maintain wealth so that you don't lose access to your current level of comfort.

When people with 1X see people with 10X or 100X and go hey! Why aren't you doing more? That gives me hope. When these people succeed, they are exactly the type of people who will give back and derive happiness from it. The right person who acquires wealth can do a lot of good in the world.

•
20m ago
> Most of the things that make you unhappy can be remedied with money

Nonsense. Most of the things that can be remedied with money are not the truly painful things of life either.

Will money save you from heartache? From the pain of losing a loved one? From being lonely? From having no respect from your peers? From losing your health to incurable cancer?

At that point, all money can do for one is make them even more pathetic.

hnlmorg•14m ago
I agree money doesn’t buy happiness, but money can go a long way to helping with those problems.

For example, money can pay for better medical care.

SoftTalker•8m ago
Money won't cure pain and suffering (although it does make trial lawyers happy) but even there it can buy better care. But pretty much everything else in life is better and more enjoyable with more money. You can live in a nicer house, in a better neighborhood, with better schools, with better goods and services, with more things to do, etc. You can travel more, in a more comfortable style. You can support other projects, artists, charity, etc.
bryanlarsen•2m ago
Unhappiness and happiness are surprisingly orthogonal. Removing unhappiness does not make you happy, it makes you not unhappy[1]. Being not unhappy is a requirement for happiness, but it's not sufficient.

1: not unhappy is weird phrasing. Substitute not sad or not angry or not hungry or whatever for your particular state of unhappiness.

fhn
•
7m ago
your bank owns your money?
qmmmur
•
5m ago
I’m not going to personally donate a little under 0.1% of my net worth, but at some point you have to acknowledge that it’s a maddening life changing amount of money that in no way would have any noticeable effect on his life whereas it would hurt most people’s ability to pay rent. The scaling of lifestyle costs and needs is nonlinear and to survive is mostly a fixed cost that is unmet by many people, while other people donate their lives earnings to their fancies they vibe with. It’s gross.
randusername•5m ago
Billionaires have an extraordinary economic footprint and level of influence. They employ teams of people managing their affairs through their family offices [0].

I do not think they should be thought of or spoken of as individuals, they are brand entities. Their true intentions are as unknowable from scale and complexity and opacity as, I don't know, Macy's.

Commenting on if any specific billionaire is a uniformly good or bad person distracts from the more important conversation on what the optimal number of billionaires should be and what the tradeoffs are in recalibrating the system.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_office