frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

We're rebuilding financial services with AI

https://arcawealth.ai
1•smalt•1m ago•0 comments

US Supreme Court scales back Roundup cancer lawsuits

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-supreme-court-scales-back-roundup-cancer-lawsuits-2026-06-25/
1•Tomte•4m ago•0 comments

Complete text of carbonised Herculaneum scroll unlocked for first time

https://www.reuters.com/science/complete-text-carbonised-herculaneum-scroll-unlocked-first-time-2...
1•tylerchr•5m ago•0 comments

As banks close accounts, experts point to immigration crackdown

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/as-banks-close-accounts-experts-point-to-immigration-crackdown
1•petethomas•7m ago•0 comments

IBM Debuts First Sub-1 Nanometer Chip Technology

https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-06-25-ibm-debuts-worlds-first-sub-1-nanometer-chip-technology
1•porridgeraisin•7m ago•0 comments

UK sales of electric vehicles just overtook petrol cars for the first time

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk-sales-of-electric-vehicles-just-overtook-petrol-cars-for-...
1•j4mie•7m ago•0 comments

NationStates Turns Twenty (2022)

https://maxbarry.com/2022/11/12/news.html
1•altilunium•9m ago•0 comments

The U.S. last beat screwworm in 1966

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/06/25/texas-screwworm-history-eradication/
1•mzs•9m ago•0 comments

GTA 6 prices by country, $58 in South Korea to $107 in Israel

https://www.shanethegamer.com/esports-news/gta-6-prices-by-country/
2•misbloss•9m ago•0 comments

Gunship: Origins Devlog #1 – Flying the Latest Build [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fWPkThNmzg
1•skibz•10m ago•0 comments

How to Design Arrows

https://pangrampangram.com/blogs/journal/arrows
1•speckx•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Clutch – decentralized ride-sharing on-chain (open source)

https://clutchprotocol.io/
1•mehran_mazhar•10m ago•0 comments

Tracking and analyzing 340 AI leaders/blogs to find out what matters

https://brightray.ai/
1•lundbe•10m ago•1 comments

There's One Clear Reason Americans Are Gloomy About A.I

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/opinion/ai-americans-pessimism.html
1•xbryanx•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: iOS Apps on Linux

https://github.com/Lore-Hex/QuillUI
1•ljlolel•11m ago•0 comments

Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship

https://thomasdullien.github.io/guides/entrepreneurship/
1•nekitamo•12m ago•0 comments

Capabilities.txt

https://www.capabilitiestxt.org/
2•pschmied•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Contraband – Ticketed VR cinema for indie and AI-made films

https://contraband.watch
1•phaedrus044•15m ago•0 comments

IBM says it can fit nearly 100B transistors on a chip

https://www.zdnet.com/education/computers-tech/ibm-claims-beyond-nanometer-milestone-with-sub-1-n...
1•CrankyBear•18m ago•0 comments

Why aren't there more AlphaFolds?

https://nkeivan.com/writing/why-no-more-alphafolds
1•nimski•18m ago•0 comments

Go Easy on the Feeds, Reddit

https://openrss.org/blog/go-easy-on-the-feeds-reddit
3•theanonymousone•19m ago•0 comments

The Agent Is Not the Scanner: Making AI Security Agents Better

https://shad0wmazt3r.github.io/ai-security
1•speckx•19m ago•0 comments

Cairn – Task tracker with no database; tasks are Markdown files in your repo

https://github.com/ShahramMebashar/cairn
1•talavoock•19m ago•0 comments

Democracy has a listening problem. These AI tools might help

https://www.fastcompany.com/91563889/democracy-has-a-listening-problem-these-ai-tools-could-actua...
2•johnshades•19m ago•0 comments

China's coal power on the rise again in '26, reversing first-in-a-decade decline

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-coal-power-rise-again-2026-reversing-first-in-a-de...
5•littlexsparkee•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pgrust, Postgres in Rust (passing 100% of Postgres regression tests)

https://github.com/malisper/pgrust
1•malisper•23m ago•0 comments

If you have a MSI EdgeXpert you haven't been getting firmware updates

https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threads/msi-edgexpert-firmware-updates.419482/
1•wtcross•24m ago•1 comments

The Benefits and Harms of Generative AI for Novice Programmers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTUh0OO6Kmo
1•otterdude•24m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Traces – local-first ee tooling for part sourcing and schematic review

https://github.com/usetraces/traces
2•benstirling•24m ago•1 comments

The Digital Euro Is Coming: The EU's Convenience Paradox

https://medium.com/@wolfhf/the-digital-euro-is-coming-the-eus-convenience-paradox-874723b3f79f
1•lcubw•24m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Federal agents track down woman, demand she remove Instagram post about ICE

https://www.syracuse.com/news/2026/06/federal-agents-track-down-syracuse-woman-demand-she-remove-instagram-post-about-ice.html
85•coloneltcb•1h ago

Comments

lokar•1h ago
I know in CA it is a violation of election law for an armed law enforcement officer to enter a vote center unless they are responding to an incident or there to vote.
mingus88•1h ago
And what are the consequences if they do it anyway?
reactordev•1h ago
Whose gonna call the cops on the cops?
laweijfmvo•52m ago
are the cops gonna do anything? just start a mini civil war in someone’s garage?
lebuffon•56m ago
That, in my opinion, is the question of the era for the USA. We were taught that the rule of law prevailed and there are "checks and balances" but it seems like there is no prescibed way to enforce the rules inside the system.
jmclnx•54m ago
These days, I would guess a "tsk-tsk" is said to them.

The States need to grow a pair and start arresting these agents who break the law.

conartist6•1h ago
The content of the post deemed by ICE to warrant ~~federal prosecution~~ crime-boss-style intimidation:

> BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Johnathan to be indicted!

If anyone is wondering, it would still be a good day : )

fc417fc802•1h ago
National Security Memorandum 7

> politically motivated terrorist acts such as ... organized doxing campaigns

Clearly she's party to a criminal conspiracy to dox federal agents. It was benevolent of them to let her off with nothing more than a warning to cease and desist.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/coun...

sanex•56m ago
Ah yes illegal according to those laws handed down by the king.
alistairSH•55m ago
But she didn't dox him - per the quote above, the Minnesota Star released his name. She simply restated what was reported.

And that's before we consider the absurdity of making the names of federally-sanctioned killers private. They should all be wearing name tags and ID numbers.

And she didn't actually do what the agents claimed in their letter to her:

“This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties."

She did none of the above. She only said "This is his name. Would be nice if he was indicted." That's not a threat - she's not in a position to indict him or sway a DA towards indictment. His family wasn't mentioned. There was no impeding of his work,

fanatic2pope•1h ago
I wonder how far we are away from people being arrested for holding up blank pieces of paper.
reactordev•1h ago
I mean, if we are going to go after people for their tweets and posts, there’s a social network that needs crawling…
dgellow•1h ago
Happened in 2023 in the UK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_paper_protest
graemep•50m ago
The UK case involved him being "lead away" by police and "detained" when he returned and spoke so not really an arrest for holding up a blank piece of paper. Not good by any means, but not quite "for holding up a blank piece of paper". The other UK case was about a threat of arrest if he wrote on the paper - that is under the law that bans protests in Parliament Square. Again, not good, but not for holding up a blank piece of paper.
dgellow•44m ago
I thought detainment was a lighter kind of arrest. Seems that I’m wrong and they are distinct concepts (I’m not too familiar with the English terminology here, my bad)
mrhottakes•48m ago
profdevloper•56m ago
Pretti Good work by feds here
delichon•52m ago
This kind of intimidation sucks and I'd like to see individual officers who indulge in it lose their qualified immunity and be prosecuted for it.

But I'm at least grateful to live under a regime that needs to break its own laws to do this, and so such charges can be dismissed by courts that follow the law, even if they don't apply consequences to the offending officials. Compare that to the UK where more than 12k people were arrested for social media posts in 2023 alone and where it is fully permitted under the law with great discretion and supported by the courts.

It's a bit like "my husband is better than yours because he doesn't beat me as hard", but it's something.

Steve16384•46m ago
Which of the 12K arrests do you not agree with? Or are you saying people should be free to write whatever they want on social media with no repercussions?
bryceacc•6m ago
>Or are you saying people should be free to write whatever they want on social media with no repercussions?

no repercussions from the government, yes, people should be free to write whatever they want

inglor_cz•5m ago
Most countries in the West have higher threshold to arrest someone over social media posts. Some actually much, much higher.

12K is just a ridiculous number and indicates that the UK indeed has a free speech problem. I don't think that in my country there were more like ~ 20 actual arrests over the same problem during the same period.

Even if you agree with prosecuting people for speech, why exactly would you arrest them and drag them to prison/jail? Even here in Europe, this is a sort of offense that usually results in a suspended sentence or a fine, and a physical arrest is absolutely unnecessary, unless there is a good suspicion that that person is going to harm some concrete people at a concrete time.

In a more liberal country, even if prosecution over an utterance takes place, it usually happens without arrests, simply by asking the culprit to come to a police station and explain themselves, later the same in front of a court. There just isn't any need for physical restraining of that person, it is just intimidation.

conartist6•52m ago
I'm having a hard time reading your sarcasm level here so I'm going to assume its around 85%.
hightrix•46m ago
It is widely reported and posted around the internet that Jonathan Ross murdered Rene Good while acting in official duties as an ICE agent.

There is no conspiracy here.

laweijfmvo•53m ago
I don’t read the Minnesota Star and hadn’t seen any of this, so, if anything the Feds doxxed their own by bringing it to my attention.
mattnewton•52m ago
_in a polling place_ no less
panny•33m ago
Maybe you should ask them for an ID to make sure they belong there.
axus•10m ago
I see they were invited in by the person they wanted to intimidate, so that she wouldn't be alone, and there were no voters present. "Better judgement" would have been to not invite them and to not accept the invitation, but after the fact I could say it's preferable to the alternative. The person who decided to take action against this lady should be fired though.
LightHugger•39m ago
The context of contacting this woman in any way for a post this tame is ridiculous, the cop involved should be fired and indicted for harassment himself.

THAT SAID, renee good tried to run over a cop (Jonathan Ross) to escape being arrested and got shot for it. The moment she decided to enact violence against another person she forfeited her right to life. I actually think trying to go after a cop for a clear justified self defense, actually undermines nationwide effort to hold bad cops accountable. It provides justification for police union blue line bullshit. Do not be dishonest or blind when trying to fix police issues in the US or it just makes things worse.

The lack of accountability, how one sided it is, is what's driving people crazy, when cops do something wrong nothing happens. Some people use it as an excuse to demand cops who did nothing wrong get concequences they didn't earn too though, which isn't helpful. Rene good deserved her concequences 100% though what a piece of shit person.

conartist6•34m ago
You do realize that's a politically motivated account of actions that has never been subjected to any kind of cross-examination.

I want a trial to know if this was a murder or a law enforcement action or self-defense. I should not be expected to decide PERSONALLY, I'm supposed to have a justice system that does that.

conartist6•29m ago
What I heard is that she attempted to drive a way in a direction that would have made no physical contact with the officer, but the vehicle started to slip sideways on ice and travel in the direction of the officer.

If this is all true, the officer might likely be acquitted at trial, as the only necessary justification for such force is that the officer have any reason to fear for their life.

But THERE SHOULD BE A TRIAL. What I have heard from those who have studied the available forensic evidence is that Renee Good never intended to do anything but drive away, which may or may not have been legal but is not (necessarily) attempted murder, nor alone cause for an instant death penalty.

There should be a trial if for no other reason than to clear the name of Renee Good, who you are accusing of a heinous crime

felixgallo•15m ago
You don't have to 'hear' anything. If you watch the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw for example (0:55), you see that the tires are turned completely away from the murderer, who fires shots directly into her even though he is obviously not in danger of being seriously harmed.
LightHugger•26m ago
Trials aren't held for obvious outcomes, the moment she hit the cop with her car there's no reason for that. I understand some people think that violently attacking someone "with power" like a cop can be justified but there is no chance of convicting a cop of anything in this situation. Out here in the real world there are constant abuses by police of non-violent people and even they aren't put on trial for it. Start there.

Frankly there are a lot of cops who need the death penalty for horrific abuse of their positions to rape and kill and yet just get juggled between departments instead, it's insane. And you're here whining about the obvious justified self defense for political reasons, it's stupid.

The fact is hitting the cop with her car is on video and she knew she was under arrest after spending the day blocking the road. You do not get to rewrite reality with your politically motivated desire for a trial.

conartist6•24m ago
again a legal defense would contest your claim that there was intent to attack
LightHugger•11m ago
I really don't care at all what a dishonest legal offense (it would be offense not defense remember, if you want the cop prosecuted) would claim when the evidence is so clear and it's only politically motivated insane people saying otherwise. Furthermore "intent to attack" Is actually irrelevant when 1. she did "attack" the cop by hitting him with her car and 2. the cop doesn't have to guess at her intent when he is already being assaulted with a deadly weapon.
thecrash•18m ago
It's scary that you bring up the question of whether Rene Good was under arrest or not at the time she was killed. As if it were legal or justified to execute people for failing to cooperate with their own arrest. It's scary because you're not the only person who believes this - many in ICE and other police agencies hold this belief, and by repeating it you encourage them to kill again.
noboostforyou•12m ago
> Rene good deserved her concequences 100% though what a piece of shit person.

Serious question - wtf is wrong with you?

LightHugger•8m ago
Wtf is wrong with you? How else do you expect assaulting a cop with your car to turn out? Violent people should not be viewed as more that pieces of shit. That goes for cops too if they're doing it to innocent people by the way, but that's not the situation being discussed.
noboostforyou•5m ago
"assaulting a cop with your car" as if she wasn't trying to simply leave the area and had her tires turned completely away from the cop who proceeds to shoot her in the head.

> innocent people

I must have missed the trial where she was found guilty, when did that happen? Oh wait...

Either way, you're celebrating the extra-judicial execution of a citizen and think that's normal behavior. You sound like the violent person here.

hightrix•10m ago
> Renee Good tried to run over a cop

First, your disrespectful lower casing of her name shows exactly who you are and what you are trying to do.

Second, no, she did not. We all have seen the videos from every angle. Jonathan Ross, the murderer, was not in danger.

I agree, the lack of accountability of ICE agents abusing their power and murdering US citizens is ridiculous.

The facts in your link contradict your post
lux-lux-lux•44m ago
Given the costs of defending a federal case start at the five figs and the typical naughty tweets style offense nets community service at worst, I’m not so sure.
LightHugger•15m ago
It's scary how insane this reply is considering i clearly stated the reason she got shot is hitting a cop with her car. It is not legal to execute someone for evading arrest but violent assault with a deadly weapon justifies proportional use of force. If you hit a cop with your car while evading arrest getting shot is a given.
conartist6•4m ago
Yeah I get that. I understand that a car is really a deadly weapon, and the officer in a split second could not know for sure if the intent was to attack.

But the question of whether Renee decided to do manslaughter in her last seconds is still critically important to Renee, who again you are not giving the presumption of innocence that I am at least giving the officer

hightrix•6m ago
> violently attacking someone

Jonathan Ross is the only person in that interaction that violently attacked someone resulting in death.