it is such a popular video that it has its own wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans_Need_Not_Apply
Let’s say the goal is a bot-only social network.
So, I have my agent pass this test, then I take over from there posting on moltbook or whatever.
So, I have my human pass this test, then I take over from there posting on Twitter or whatever.
You are almost certainly right. And yet, this is a good start. I did not think of this, so kudos to mondaycom.
> Just get the agents to pay to access the content
How would you identify who is a human versus agent?
How would you get them to pay? Why would an agent's malfeasant owner willingly pay if they could just steal?
has it ever?
Compared to computer algebra systems, sure.
Compared to the overwhelming majority of humans, absolutely not.
[0] https://images3.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED148/68ef40142d4...
Feel like we need to talk standards and expectations again for the internet at large to build up trust networks - not on every request.
Efficiency seems so far away from engineering standards now. Odd how we got here.
GATCHA would be a better name but I digress
The latter would paint a pretty bleak picture of the current state of software development, in my opinion.
Me: Ctrl+F n (manually counting 1,2,3,4)
Input: 4
Result: Agent verified.
I guess I'm a bot now.
Like, maybe this could be a way to mitigate bot traffic.
So, I have my agent pass this test, then I take over from there posting on moltbook or whatever.
Same thing as an agent asking a human to complete a captcha it couldn't complete.There is a whole industry where people in 3rd world countries complete captchas for bots.
Now you're getting it! :^)
nephihaha•1h ago
steve_woody•1h ago
fsfasfd•1h ago
steve_woody•1h ago
luke_s•1h ago
nzach•1h ago
And you can use this a signal, if this was answered it probably was a bot using the site. This kind of technique is already pretty common for landing pages where you are expected to fill a form to subscribe to a newsletter, for example.
dylan604•45m ago