Now there's a metric that would make my boss nervous.
> Total inference spend across all parties during the incident window was $1.7M, which Marketing has asked us to start describing as “a record investment in autonomous customer assurance.”
This is too funny.
(Also CVE-2026-LGTM would be an awesome name for a Culture ship)
(also, CVEs are numeric only, so the "LGTM" (looks good to me) and CVE "YIKES" is also a big giveaway, on top of ~all of the text being outlandish)
Not the first thing, it’s buried in the tags as grey on light grey on white.
> one vendor’s marketing team, cc’d on the cost anomaly alert, issues a press release citing “a 430% YoY increase in adversarial multi-agent security reasoning.” The stock opens up 6%.
That happens! That is not satire. So i had to visit the comments here to be sure :)
(In all seriousness it seems this is the dream of a huge number of AI pilled execs dreaming of infinite velocity at a fraction of the cost... velocity pointed where, you ask? Well stop asking or you'll be next.)
pmarreck•21m ago
InsideOutSanta•17m ago
jazzypants•11m ago
This was hilarious. I didn't know that I needed AI slop satire in my life.
dcrazy•17m ago
piazz•16m ago
(if you have to say it, that’s how you know it’s good)
jazzypants•9m ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
bilekas•15m ago