The part that complicates the obvious answers: the Anthropic directive keyed on the nationality of the person accessing the model, not where the company is incorporated; even their own foreign-national employees lost access. So "just flip to a Delaware C-corp" doesn't clearly solve it for a team like ours.
This is all new and we don't think anyone has real answers yet. We want to hear what others think might work. A few directions we've floated, none of which we're sure about:
- Hoping that at least one frontier model provider remains accessible - An open-weight/non-US floor (GLM/DeepSeek/Qwen) - Hoping for frontier access via Bedrock/Vertex/Azure rather than first-party APIs
Our concern is that the regional capability difference gets worse over time. We'd all be happy to naturalize to US citizens, but is this even possible - and can we do so before the US compute lead combined with regional restrictions locks us out of being competitive in software production?
What are we missing? How are other non-US national founded startups mitigating this (emerging) risk? Are we overestimating it or where could we be wrong?
[Context: South Africa, Pre-seed, SMB AI Software Infrastructure, 100% South African Team]
verdverm•1h ago
This was on HN a day or so ago
www.anildash.com/2026/06/23/fight-ai-platform-war/
recsv-heredoc•1h ago
What if the frontier-minus-6-months assumption does not hold? The US has 5x the AI Capex of China, and 10x the EU. Assuming AI is compute limited (we certainly seem to be given the RAM crisis) - wouldn't it be reasonable to assume frontier models are likely to continue to pull ahead?