frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aat7487
1•teleforce•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hatchr – Share Claude Designs with a public link

https://www.hatchr.link/
1•othmanosx•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Noise Lang, JIT stochastic programing language

https://noiselang.com/
1•manucorporat•6m ago•0 comments

PrismLib – semantic LLM cache and cluster mesh that cuts token spend

https://github.com/insightitsGit/prismlib
1•insightits•6m ago•0 comments

Economists have pushed for prediction markets. They're not what they'd hoped for

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/21/business/prediction-markets-economists
1•JumpinJack_Cash•7m ago•0 comments

Routing for serverless servers with Pingora, Envoy, and Spanner

https://modal.com/blog/serverless-servers
1•birdculture•8m ago•0 comments

EU Trade Explorer

https://tradedashboard.eu/
1•abracadabrapouf•9m ago•1 comments

Utility for Multi-GPU Node Configuration

https://github.com/rghosh08/nvidia-nvswitch-setup/releases/tag/v0.1.0
1•rghosh8•14m ago•0 comments

Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Mouser_to_the_Cabinet_Office
2•modzu•18m ago•0 comments

Build, Don't Posture

https://entertainmentindustry.ai/
2•DavidFrangiosa•20m ago•1 comments

We are capitalist, not socialist

https://www.thepromisetoamerica.com
2•donsupreme•23m ago•2 comments

U.S. Proposes to Drop Brake Pedal Requirements for Self-Driving Vehicles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/25/us-proposes-to-drop-brake-pedal-requirements-for-self-driving-veh...
1•karakoram•25m ago•0 comments

Where Will Europe's Heatwave Be Most Deadly?

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2026/06/25/where-will-europes-heatwave-be-most-deadly
1•karakoram•26m ago•1 comments

FIFA World Cup website in 2002

https://xcancel.com/WebDesignMuseum/status/2070517388290806137
1•airstrike•27m ago•1 comments

Add MCP Apps to Your AI SDK Application

https://vercel.com/kb/guide/ai-sdk-mcp-apps
1•flashbrew•29m ago•0 comments

Cartels of Mediocrity

https://blog.taylorwood.io/2026/06/19/social-norms-and-low-doers.html
3•1659447091•30m ago•0 comments

AI Powered Photo Gallery Without the Cloud

https://github.com/Arkalogy/best-photo-picker
1•anonu•33m ago•0 comments

I removed the vector database from my AI agent stack

https://github.com/usemoss/moss
2•philosopherr•34m ago•0 comments

Texas Public School Students Will Be Required to Read the Bible

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/us/texas-schools-book-list.html
2•droidjj•36m ago•0 comments

The Last Bottleneck Is Fear

https://runtimewire.com/article/the-last-bottleneck-is-fear
2•ryanmerket•39m ago•1 comments

The Indus Script-Computational Analysis and Interpretations (2020) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF_nJ4vfG-A
1•teleforce•44m ago•0 comments

Intel's Chip Business Shows Signs of Life After Years of Struggle

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/26/technology/intel-turnaround.html
2•voxadam•45m ago•1 comments

Show HN: OCR.chat

https://ocr.chat/
1•nadermx•50m ago•1 comments

Thinking to recall: How reasoning unlocks parametric knowledge in LLMs

https://research.google/blog/thinking-to-recall-how-reasoning-unlocks-parametric-knowledge-in-llms/
3•krackers•50m ago•0 comments

ComAI – An open-source Linux assistant for troubleshooting with local LLMs

https://github.com/hossbit/comai-linux-assistant
2•mirhacker•53m ago•0 comments

My Addiction with Trading Apps

https://cat.strayforge.com/posts/investment-reflection/
1•litlig•54m ago•0 comments

Why It's So Hard to Add a Column in the Middle of a PostgreSQL Table

https://www.bytebase.com/blog/why-its-hard-to-add-a-column-in-the-middle-of-postgres-table/
2•jonbaer•54m ago•0 comments

Meta Patent: Prescription Lenses That Project Virtual Screens into Your Vision

https://patentlyze.com/patent/meta-holographic-ar-display-built-prescription-lenses/
2•patentlyze•56m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A shareable World Cup 2026 bracket simulator with live results

https://fifasim.com
2•bobbyy•57m ago•0 comments

With AI, researchers discover new way to detect sudden cardiac death risk

https://news.berkeley.edu/2026/06/24/with-ai-researchers-discover-new-way-to-detect-sudden-cardia...
1•hhs•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

US allows Anthropic to release Mythos to 'trusted partners'

https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-releases-anthropic-model-mythos-some-us-companies-semafor-reports-2026-06-26/
153•bobrenjc93•1h ago

Comments

tristanj•1h ago
Original source: https://www.semafor.com/article/06/27/2026/us-releases-power...
enraged_camel•1h ago
@dang can you change it?
jauntywundrkind•1h ago
* to some US companies.

Asterisk the size of a Mac truck.

Also this administration having say over who gets access to what AI is just so much more grift corruption and picking your favorites / destroying others, for these incdecent undemocratic in American grifters who've seized our state.

wolvoleo•1h ago
If this is the way things are now, isn't that going to crash the AI stocks? All those trillions dumped into it probably weren't with the expectation that it could only be sold to a handful of select US agencies and corporations.
thrwaway55•45m ago
They are all private aren't they? There's nothing to crash since the valuations were all made up funny raise numbers anyway. A donation to the right person likely removes the restrictions
bayarearefugee•40m ago
> If this is the way things are now, isn't that going to crash the AI stocks?

Maybe, maybe not. Tech stocks are mostly vibes-based now, reality isn't really a concern for them.

tracerbulletx•1h ago
Imposing a licensing system on models for limiting domestic use should require an act of congress but I mean obviously we're well past that red line.
coffeemug•1h ago
Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Even firearms, despite a constitutional amendment! Why not models? (Note I am not arguing it's a good idea; I'm making a narrow argument that there is precedent.)

EDIT: I agree that it should require an act of Congress to explicitly delegate this power.

verelo•1h ago
None of those things are knowledge. I think theres something specific around limiting access to knowledge and capabilities that makes this feel insidious.
Jblx2•55m ago
Information is covered by ITAR, so that's not new. You can illegally export information about an ITAR covered item by just allowing a foreign national the potential to see an item. They don't even have to prove the foreign national actually did see it.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/subchapter-M...

UncleEntity•1h ago
Fairly certain all those have "acts of congress" attached to them. I mean, it used to take a constitutional amendment to make something illegal but now we have tons of agencies responsible for regulating all the things.

Plus, they're relying on the "math is a weapon" law to ban "export" of the models.

frogperson•1h ago
Who needs freedom of speech anyway? I'm just glad the trump admin is looking out for by best interests. /s
truthbe•26m ago
Sarcasm Detected, -40 Ameripoints have been deducted from your account. Have a nice day!
Hawkenfall•1h ago
This appears to be only for Mythos 5 access, NOT Fable 5.
sourthyme•1h ago
Aren't these the same models?
paxys•1h ago
Mythos doesn't have the strict safeguards of Fable and is only accessible by a very small number of pre-approved companies.
aesthesia•1h ago
Under the hood, yes, but Mythos had more relaxed safeguards and was/is only available to a subset of approved customers under Project Glasswing, similar to the situation with GPT-5.6 now.
qsxfthnkp2322•1h ago
Fable was available to me as a normal person using Claude.ai

Mythos never was and I don’t think that’s changing.

irthomasthomas•52m ago
So only 100 companies have exclusive access to frontier AI.
pertymcpert•1h ago
Why would they allow Mythos but not Fable? Fable is the one with more guardrails.
nozzlegear•1h ago
To quote famed businessman and philosopher Eugene Krabs: "Money."
layer8•1h ago
They only allow it for specific companies and agencies, which are trusted with the less restricted model. The general public is still not trusted to use Fable, apparently.
__natty__•1h ago
And we get the news the same time OpenAI releases 5.6. What a coincidence?
mrandish•34m ago
I think they kind of had to since they allowed OpenAI to do a 5.6 "preview to trusted parties" today. The other driver is that the DoD/NSA wanted to get access to Mythos again. I figure OAI will now do several weeks of 'preview' like Anthropic did with Mythos. When OAI wants to release 5.6 wider to actually start making money with it, I expect Fable will get approved the same day.

Back when the administration hit Mythos/Fable with the surprise ban, I figured this would be the endgame. They'd keep Anthropic tied up until a competitor had a roughly comparable model ready, then gate them the same.

sscaryterry•1h ago
I thought Fable was a "safer" Mythos?!
dchftcs•1h ago
I suppose the point is that Mythos was released to a smaller set of partners anyway and Fable is for the masses.
zuzululu•1h ago
should see 5.6 any day now
skywhopper•1h ago
Why post a content free link to Twitter for this?
nozzlegear•1h ago
Wowee, just happens to be on the same day of OpenAI's Sol announcement. How convenient for Dario and Anthropic!
__natty__•59m ago
That’s exactly what I was thinking. Feels like someone is playing a high-stakes game, putting on a show involving the US government.
Aeolun•31m ago
This should perhaps not be surprising considering the president.
outside1234•1h ago
Is there a list of the partners that get access? That should be public, right?
mikestorrent•13m ago
Bless your heart
paxys•1h ago
TL;DR - OpenAI and Anthropic are both allowed to ship their most powerful models to a small number of companies pre-approved by Trump.
aryonoco•55m ago
Land of the free, land of the brave. Free market. Freedom of speech. Market economy.

These words don’t mean what they use to anymore. Newspeak is in full swing. Words still sound the same and are written in the same way but now mean something completely different. If Mao and Stalin were alive, they would be nodding approvingly.

wasting_time•36m ago
Free for me, not for thee!

I hope the Chinese models catch up soon so I can stop contributing to the American economy.

SwellJoe•49m ago
"I have determined that appropriate safeguards are in place to permit certain trusted partners to access the Claude Mythos 5 Model"

I assume "trusted partners" means, "companies that have bribed Trump an appropriate amount". A few million for the inauguration, a few million for the ballroom, a few million on a movie about Melania, the don wants a taste.

andrewchambers•46m ago
This seems like it will have pretty huge negative affects on startups needing to compete with 'trusted partners'
A_D_E_P_T•41m ago
Startups don't have as much money to spend on lobbying and gifts, though.
ares623•39m ago
Will startups be even a thing now that the VCs obviously just need to funnel all their money to 2 or so companies ad-infinitum for guaranteed returns.
airstrike•33m ago
The single most important question to be discussed on this website right now.
redcheeks•18m ago
Whatever happened to those network states? It's starting to look like it's them, UAE or Singapore
slashdave•24m ago
Well... there are crypto startups, and perhaps a generous definition of "money"
andy99•31m ago
Henchman21•38m ago
This is what “stacking the deck” looks like
kristopolous•36m ago
Next time someone tells you this is the party of free market and small government, I guess you just laugh now?
ryanar•30m ago
its all trump, he is a megalomaniac, not affiliated with any party but his own
Klathmon•25m ago
But it's not just him, it's the entire party aggressively supporting him and everything he does.
atlgator•15m ago
They passed one major piece of legislation since he took office and it was loaded with pork to get everyone onboard. I wouldn't call that aggressive. The Right is very fractured right now.
wk_end•7m ago
At least in part that's because they've stopped legislating. The executive now basically just does whatever it wants.
jLaForest•4m ago
The right is fractured is several ways but there is one unifying value: unquestioning support for Trump
servercobra•
jimmydoe•33m ago
Congrats sama. Such a great sophisticated 5d chess move.
llelouch•4m ago
Please explain. Do you think Altman wanted this to catch-up?
mlinsey•32m ago
I understand why Anthropic might not want to fight this particular one in court, because they're trying to convince the administration to let them move forward.

But would another company who is not on the trusted partner list and has less to lose taking on the admin have standing to sue here? On the basis of the export control being illegal and this putting their business at a disadvantage vs. competitors with access

olalonde•31m ago
It feels the U.S. is moving closer to a textbook definition of crony capitalism. Really sad but unsurprising with the current administration.
alanwreath•9m ago
I’m not sure what the US government is trying to do. At first it seems like they are just trying to stifle some company that said no. Now they are just doing free publicity. It’s like never before have I wanted to try something out as much as this.

They’re in effect saying “nothing else is as powerful as what Anthropic put out”. Even though that might not really be the case it’s what it sounds like.

kdawag•6m ago
To the surprise of absolutely nobody following the news
delichon•1h ago
I don't like it one bit, but Congress passed the Arms Export Control Act (22 USC 2778) in the Ford administration and it has been applied to software since at least the Clinton administration.
conartist6•51m ago
isn't this materially different in that it creates a kind of class system within the US?
skywhopper•1h ago
It has never taken a constitutional amendment to make something illegal.
onionisafruit•54m ago
slavery required the 13th amendment
alpinisme•36m ago
Prohibition was the 18th amendment
standardUser•1h ago
All of the agencies responsible for those regulations were created by and get their funding from Congress. Currently, they're asleep at the wheel. Or a better idiom might be "cowering in the corner".
GolfPopper•21m ago
I would say, "sitting smugly astride the monster's back, confident that they will never be fed to it".
tzs•1h ago
> Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives.

Every one of those is by a regulatory agency that was explicitly empowered by Congress to do such regulation.

to11mtm•45m ago
until it isn't, i.e. certain rulings over the last couple years...
sigmar•1h ago
The ATF was created by an act of congress. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968
jiggawatts•1h ago
"Malboro cigarettes may once again be sold, but Newport remains banned for everyone except large purchasers that have paid the appropriate bri... fees."
motbus3•1h ago
I wonder what kind of emergency will happen when real elections get around
tiahura•44m ago
They did. Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. § 4511 );Export Control Reform Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4812 are just two of them.
naturalmovement•6m ago
Sad but not surprising the one comment providing real educational facts is being downvoted and buried under mountains of sperging TDS. To wit:

> The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) is a U.S. federal law that authorizes the President to control exports for national security and foreign policy purposes, replacing the previous Export Administration Act of 1979.

Passed with nearly unanimous support of both houses of Congress and signed into law.

tchalla•38m ago
Do you remember the export controls on Covid vaccine material during the height of coronavirus? I do
actionfromafar•30m ago
Overturning the Chevron doctrine is good because it stops lawful people from doing things we don't like. We aren't bound by laws, so we can do whatever we want.

-- GOP probably

az226•13m ago
And even if a court places an injunction on the ban, it's possible Anthropic will still choose to keep it unavailable.
Other than maybe some in-the-moment cybersec wrappers, is this really true? Does anyone think a startup with a good product is going to be materially disadvantaged by not having access to an incrementally better security focused LLM release? It’s lots of fun to pretend it’s some step-change that’s too dangerous for general release, but in real life it’s not conferring some massive advantage that any real startup would need to compete. Almost everyone would be best just to ignore it and keep building.

(Just to be clear, I think the gatekeeping is ridiculous, especially given the above)

afavour•12m ago
That kind of gets to the absurdity of it. Either it’s a wildly powerful next generation model with incredible capabilities and thus needs to be limited… or it’s another progressive enhancement like we’ve seen already and limiting access to it makes no sense.
25m ago
And yet the rest of the party falls in behind him.
keyle•17m ago
It seems people can flip that coin whenever it suits them.
malcolmgreaves•15m ago
The entire Republican party in all branches of government is supporting Trump. His politics and the Republican party politics are one and the same. The last election the party did not have a platform because, quite literally, they said that whatever Trump says _is_ their platform.
afavour•14m ago
They have affiliated themselves to him. Watch, within a month of Democrats being back in power they’ll be harping small government, denigrating the national debt they ballooned themselves. There’s no reason to help them attempt to disavow it.
gkoberger•10m ago
Trump has an 87% approval rating amongst Republicans as of the last poll I can find.

While Trump is a megalomanic and does whatever he wants, he has the mandate of the Republican party, whose elected officials could choose at any moment to end this by withdrawing support.

Don't let them off the hook.

ryanmcbride•8m ago
it's actually the entire party that's propping him up. If it was just trump he would be living on the street.
GolfPopper•22m ago
I've been laughing when people tell me that for my entire adult life. It remains a pretty funny bit of dark humor, though.
az226•14m ago
Not just that, Biden administration started with some AI regulation that the Trump administration nixed, and then outright banning models. Lunacy.
nutjob2•10m ago
Also free speech/the first amendment and various other rights people are supposed to have but don't in practice.
paytonjjones•7m ago
That's always been a relative, rather than absolute statement.

Genuine question: if Democrats take power, do you expect them to be more interventionist or less interventionist with respect to AI? Bernie's jockeying leads me to suspect "more", but I could very well be wrong.

(FWIW I personally think modern AI falls in the small realm of potentially dangerous technologies that merit careful, ideally bipartisan, government oversight)

jknoepfler•3m ago
Ever since I've been conscious (the 80s), it's been the party of fear, violence and greed. They've consistently nominated actual clowns for positions of power. B-movie actor Ronald Reagan... Dan Quayle... Sarah Palin... the current, truly stunning iteration of absolute moral and intellectual bankruptcy TWICE after he killed hundreds of thousands of people due to COVID/vaccine skepticism and staged a violent attack on the capitol after losing a democratic election.

Free market? Small government? Big police state, trillions in defense contractor grift, unsustainable tax breaks to the wealthiest leading to massive spending defects... all while doing everything to erode access to education, healthcare and basic services.

It is just utterly baffling to me. I'm... well along the spectrum... so people not responding correctly to obvious information is just something I've gotten used to but just... wow.