> We considered this option: letting everyone contribute an amount of their choice to support the initiative. But Cartes.app is not a charity, nor is it a free software component on a shelf: it is a service that consumes resources with every use and must handle the load of thousands of daily users.
> Moreover, we still have many features to add to compete with Big Tech, which requires investments.
So you want the public to fund your business and what it gets in return is the honour of improving your business and "compete with Big Tech"?
I think there's a strong incentive to take their chances with Big Tech until a better alternative pops up. In my view, a public service should benefit (and be controlled by) the public. If it's not controlled by the public, there's little difference between a big US provider and a big Chinese or European one.
robtherobber•40m ago
> We considered this option: letting everyone contribute an amount of their choice to support the initiative. But Cartes.app is not a charity, nor is it a free software component on a shelf: it is a service that consumes resources with every use and must handle the load of thousands of daily users.
> Moreover, we still have many features to add to compete with Big Tech, which requires investments.
So you want the public to fund your business and what it gets in return is the honour of improving your business and "compete with Big Tech"?
I think there's a strong incentive to take their chances with Big Tech until a better alternative pops up. In my view, a public service should benefit (and be controlled by) the public. If it's not controlled by the public, there's little difference between a big US provider and a big Chinese or European one.