frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Gated Frontier Model = the Fall of Capitalism

https://www.elevair.org/letter
1•campbellhendee•41s ago•0 comments

1 down, 1 to go: Aptera clears first federal hurdle

https://aptera.us/epa-release/
1•TeaVMFan•4m ago•1 comments

Tinfoil Pigeons – see the aircraft overhead

https://tinfoilpigeons.com/
1•gnabgib•10m ago•0 comments

Compiler for LLMs, world models, and AGI

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04542
1•OsamaJaber•10m ago•0 comments

Korean law targeting fake news takes effect as journalist groups raise concerns

https://apnews.com/article/south-korea-fake-news-law-press-freedom-7dcc52be82c047f9645218bec2f93966
1•zuzululu•11m ago•0 comments

A software engineering interview question I like: computing the median

https://krisshamloo.com/blog/007
2•speckx•13m ago•0 comments

Remote Attestation

https://www.liamcvw.com/p/remote-attestation
6•lcvw•19m ago•1 comments

A terminal designed for ClaudeCode to replace Claude Desktop

https://velaterm.com/
2•Ellis_dev•19m ago•0 comments

Blockchain Is Inevitable

https://www.raymondcheng.net/posts/blockchain-inevitable/
2•ryscheng•22m ago•1 comments

MIRA: Multiplayer Interactive World Models Trained on Rocket League

https://mira-wm.com/
3•ethanlipson•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tilion – MCP for Claude Code to stop it getting blocked on the web

https://github.com/tiliondev/fortress/tree/main/mcp
5•arhamshahrier•27m ago•0 comments

Find genre of a track with CNN trained on spectrograms

https://findgenre.com/
2•illectronic•28m ago•1 comments

AI bills are baffling the C-suite after shift to usage-based pricing

https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/07/03/ai-bills-are-baffling-the-c-suite-after-shift-to...
2•appreciatorBus•32m ago•0 comments

The Return of Gravity

https://abcdinamo.com/news/the-return-of-gravity
1•herbertl•35m ago•0 comments

Occupancy Math on the AMD MI355X GPU (CDNA4): A From-First-Principles Guide

https://rocm.blogs.amd.com/software-tools-optimization/occupancy-math-mi355x/README.html
2•matt_d•36m ago•0 comments

Poppy the training box, part 1: the beginnings

https://www.gilesthomas.com/2026/07/poppy-the-training-box-1-the-beginnings
2•gpjt•37m ago•0 comments

Outspoken Chinese economist who doubted official GDP data dies

https://www.ft.com/content/e201f9f4-e3b2-4c59-8300-e50e9310a554
1•dataflow•39m ago•1 comments

Intelligence Is Free, Now What? Data Systems For, Of, and by Agents

https://bair.berkeley.edu/blog/2026/07/07/intelligence-is-free-now-what/
2•matt_d•39m ago•1 comments

QuakeWorld Air Physics

https://mattias.niklewski.com/2013/01/qw_air_physics.html
2•boredemployee•39m ago•0 comments

Is Life Just Different?

https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-life-just-different-20260708/
2•jnord•42m ago•0 comments

Rust and Artificial Intelligence: The Rust Foundation's Position

https://rustfoundation.org/resource/rust-and-ai-position-statement/
2•tempaccount420•42m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Chrome extension that creates mini-Chrome extensions for you

https://www.clickremix.com/
1•alentodorov•45m ago•0 comments

Rough and Ready, California

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_and_Ready,_California
1•ttd•51m ago•0 comments

Have you heard? ClickHouse is winning the observability wars

https://charity.wtf/p/have-you-heard-clickhouse-is-winning
2•backlit4034•54m ago•0 comments

Joe Rogan Experience #2524 – Rupert Lowe [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY
5•Bender•55m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Calculator.Free - 200+ Free Calculators

https://calculator.free/
1•nadermx•57m ago•0 comments

Simple Made Easy – Rich Hickey (2011) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdOUGdseq4
2•taurath•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Skillburst - AI skills for your whole team, not just the engineers

https://skillburst.ai/
1•htahir111•1h ago•0 comments

Microsoft Publisher will no longer be supported after October 2026

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/publisher/microsoft-publisher-will-no-longer-be-supported-aft...
7•MrVandemar•1h ago•2 comments

The Unbearable Anxiety of Being Just an Ordinary Human

https://www.freepressjournal.in/analysis/the-unbearable-anxiety-of-being-just-an-ordinary-human
2•thunderbong•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

John Deere owners will get the right to repair equipment under FTC settlement

https://apnews.com/article/john-deere-right-to-repair-agriculture-equipment-cb7514ffedb95c130a976af661f2bc02
154•djoldman•1h ago

Comments

frollogaston•52m ago
Good. It's a tractor, not some tiny glued-together tech gadget.
dugite-code•49m ago
Shouldn't we be able to repair a tiny glued togethee tech gadget as well?
sublinear•43m ago
This is only getting this level of scrutiny because it's related to big ag, and John Deere is the worst example.

They're a political football now and it's more of a feel good measure.

rayusher•33m ago
Most movements don't start out big. They are won by small steps. Personally I want a law that allows people to bypass security measure after a company stop supporting the device. I have unsupported amazon echo, google home, and apple ipads that work perfectly well and I would love add custom software or even put a different os too.
taurath•42m ago
> Deere must pay $1 million collectively to the five states for antitrust enforcement costs and will be subject to strict compliance oversight for the next 10 years.

$1 million fine for probably $10 billion in profit. I know what lesson I'd learn if my only personal value was maximizing shareholder value. The compliance part can be dealt with later.

snypher•34m ago
>probably $10 billion in profit

Can you expand on this number or is it vibes-based? I'd be surprised if $10b profit was made from Service Advisor.

Anecdata; we've had a handful of problems with our tractor "computers" recently, and we haven't been charged a dime by the dealer. Our newest is 2018 model so definitely not covered by warranty.

syntaxing•24m ago
Not OP but I went through some data and John Deere makes 5B NET profit for the worse years. 10B for their best (only looking back 10 years). I wouldn’t be surprised these anticompetitive (as in anti “consumer”) has netted them north of 10B.
cyanydeez•2m ago
google's ai says: The High-Margin Ecosystem: Collectively, parts and service agreements form a highly profitable ecosystem, generating over $4 billion annually in high-margin revenue. This system captures predictable revenue long after the initial equipment sale.

That's directly related to right to repair; their systems basically shut themselves down if they weren't give the proper codes, etc. So the only people who could work on them were "certified"

ggoo•39m ago
Bananas that stuff like this needs to get litigated in our society - if you asked 100 random people "should farmers be able to repair their equipment", you would get 100 yes's.
mothballed•37m ago
Until you tell them how easy it makes it to bypass emissions restrictions. My tractor was shipped with a screw turned down to <25hp to bypass emissions controls. I could turn that screw back up and have a ~35hp tractor, but of course, that would be illegal and make lots of environmentalists cry.

Opening up John Deere tractors for right to repair virtually assures they will ~all be doing emissions deletes. Part of their lock-down was profit seeking, but the other half is that different vendors had different ideas interpretations of the law about how locked down the system had to be to prevent emissions tampering, and domestic companies more subject to US law were generally far more paranoid about it.

triceratops•32m ago
I don't understand, are 35hp tractors illegal under emissions rules? Then why even manufacture them and cripple them?
mothballed•30m ago
Tractors are legal above 25hp but it requires DPF, and at I want to say about 75, possibly more than that. Farmers generally hate DPF systems and will disable them the microsecond they get the right to repair.

>Then why even manufacture them and cripple them?

They cripple them because they know people want bigger tractor without emission control so they sell it as a less powerful tractor and then just expect people to break the law and turn the screw, and everybody is happy.

========= re: below due to throttling ========

>Thankfully, it's not illegal to own a screwdriver and nothing changes there. There's absolutely no relevance between right to repair (not right to break emission laws!) and the situation you describe.

There is because on the John Deere tractors you can't set the "screw" unless you have right to repair the engine system. John Deere has no screw because they're in the US and they're too afraid of US regulators.

MarkMarine•36m ago
Great news, the fine is so small doesn’t matter, but curing the wrong does. My hope is this standard will apply to modern cars as well, repair manuals and the software tools to interact with the cars are also heavily restricted by the manufacturers.
aceki•35m ago
As much as I hope this is a turning point, I’m not holding my breath.

John Deere was one of the most egregious offenders in the right-to-repair movement, especially with how expensive their tractors are. There’s definitely a difference paying for the repair of a ten of thousands of dollars machine versus having to buy new AirPods.

I’m no expert in US law, but my understanding is an FTC settlement doesn’t create any precedent like a court case would, so I don’t anticipate this leading to other offenders, like in tech, being held accountable. Their support is too important right now.

Ultimately, I think the underlying motive for the administration is scoring a win for a core constituency, farmers. Tariffs and immigration enforcement have really harmed the viability of their farms, but at least the admin can say the did something for them.

Nevertheless, I’m glad that John Deere is being forced to provide parts and information to individuals and repair shops.

ourmandave•2m ago
The suit was brought be Dems in a 3-2 commission vote in Jan just before Trump took office. I'm not sure he cares since he's not running again and I don't see a way he can use it for graft.
brikym•33m ago
"...Deere will now be required to make diagnostic and repair tools available to equipment owners and independent repair shops..."

This is only the tip of the iceberg. They make the parts deliberately proprietary to prevent competition. The classic example is curved cabin windows instead of flat commodity glass.

Laissez-faire capitalism is efficient at extraction not productivity.

snypher•27m ago
Having operated a ~1995 7800 with flat glass and a ~2015 7270 with curved, I know which one I'm picking.

Are automobiles using curved windshields so they have a stranglehold on the replacement windshield market?

Your example doesn't pass my sniff test.

e44858•16m ago
How is a curved window better on a tractor?
dreambuffer•32m ago
There's a cognitive dissonance on this site where everyone claims to hate this attempt at regulatory capture, yet they would do it too if it was their tech company and call it a "moat", and many are actively working towards that.
Cider9986•31m ago
Shout out to Louis Rossmann for doing a ton of work on Right to repair.

He started a website called Consumer Rights Wiki to document anti-consumer practices.

https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Main_Page

He's also involved with FULU Foundation which has a bounty of 25k to get Ring cameras working without Amazon's servers.

https://bounties.fulu.org/bounties/ring-video-doorbells

trinsic2•24m ago
The settlement changes nothing [0]

[0]: https://fighttorepair.substack.com/p/this-doesnt-break-the-m...

doginasuit•8m ago
The very concept of IP was a mistake. I understand it helped make a lot of work possible. But virtually nothing useful came from nothing, and the reservoir of human knowledge belongs to all of us. Unless you are Isaac Newton, you took a good idea and made it better or more applicable. Pretending like you own it is just dishonest.
ori_b•18m ago
I don't understand what you're trying to say. Is this prevented today or not by the denial of the right to repair?

It sounds like you are saying everyone is doing it today, so denying the right to repair doesn't affect the situation.

mothballed•16m ago
If you're a US company the vagueness of emissions law likely prevents a US company from hazarding doing it and instead locking down the repair of their power trains to ensure emission compliance. Korean companies get away with it because they don't give much a shit if they're banned from import, it can always be washed through another foreign company. John Deere can't try that sort of thing since being a household-name US company is their bread and butter for commanding a premium in the first place.

======= re: below due to throttling ========

>You pretty clearly said everyone is currently bypassing this, otherwise companies would not be putting in larger engines.

Everyone is doing it on the import tractors with the screws. They are not doing it with John Deere tractors, which are locked down for emission compliance. John Deere is handicapped by the fact they're located in the US and regulators have more leverage on them to prevent the sort of right-to-repair which would enable emission bypassing.

ori_b•11m ago
Do what? What is not happening today that you think would happen if people were given the right to repair?

You pretty clearly said everyone is currently bypassing this, otherwise companies would not be putting in larger engines. Is that wrong?

spaqin•8m ago
Thankfully, it's not illegal to own a screwdriver and nothing changes there. There's absolutely no relevance between right to repair (not right to break emission laws!) and the situation you describe.
snypher•30m ago
If we could get our operators to just run regen when they should, it wouldn't be an issue. They don't mind filling DEF and we don't mind paying for it.
hatsix•19m ago
Right to repair doesn't change any of that. Farmers were adjusting that screw anyways, that was the entire point. I'm not mad at farmers for doing it, I'm mad at John Deere at cheating the system.
mothballed•18m ago
It's not John Deere that was doing that, just some Korean companies exploring the opportunity and importing to the US. John Deere is located in the US and too afraid of the whimsical interpretations of regulators to try something like that, I think.

There was no "screw" for the commercial John Deere tractors with emissions controls, that I know of.

javawizard•12m ago
Lot of armchair quarterbacking going on, on both sides. I'd love to hear an actual farmer weigh in on this.

Anyone in the room care to volunteer?

mothballed•11m ago
tractorbynet is one of the better forums for info on opinions on tractors by people that use them regularly
q3k•10m ago
Doing that is already illegal and should be enforced using appropriate tools. We shouldn't be relying on unrelated technical measures to enforce laws.
Gigachad•8m ago
Because they don't ask it like that. It'll be "Woke communists want to confiscate the money of enterprising businesses."
toomuchtodo•6m ago
"Don't you believe in free markets and capitalism? It's their right to maximize profits."