Sarcasm aside, I'm genuinely unsure what companies expect. These products do not work without considerable misappropriation of content. The consumers are willing to overlook ethical boundaries when it's someone else's IP being illicitly acquired and abused, but gasp when it's their own.
The word "coaching" is very malleable, and could refer to perfectly legal conduct, or conduct that is illegal, unethical, or both. How would an OpenAI employee know what Apple's security processes for departing employees are? One would assume he was told by previously-departed Apple employees. Would they have been forbidden to disclose information about the outgoing process? I would think so, given how careful Apple is about these things.
> Apple accused another former employee, Chang Liu, of using a former colleague’s Apple-owned laptop to access and download technical documents while working at OpenAI. Mr. Liu told that Apple employee what information about unannounced products she should study before job interviews, Apple said.
I would be very hesitant to assist a former colleague who is still at Apple in this way. Apple is well known for using deliberate leaks to smoke out leakers, and it would be easy for them to get a current/loyal employee to go through the interview process at a competitor for the purpose of finding out if the competitor is trying to get Apple employees to act unethically/illegally.
The openAI employee in question is also a former Apple employee.
Either by being a former Apple employee, or polling former Apple employees.
ViktorRay•28m ago
Looks like the Apple..
puts on sunglasses
Didn’t fall far from the tree.
YEAHHHHHHHHH