However, when the commit history has stuff like
v0.5.0: native backends, software renderer, text input, IME
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Composer <composer@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor Grok 4.5 <noreply@cursor.com>
377 files changed
Lines changed: 62423 additions & 2871 deletions
it's very hard. These “change the entire world” commits make for a history that is impractical to follow for a human, and therefore of little interest to me.The commit history is the publish history, not the work history.
I recently had a good experience creating custom UI based on ebitengine — also a cross-platform Go engine. As it is a game engine, it has this built in game drawing loop, GPU-accelerated, with some cross-platform kb/mouse input handling. And this feels like a good platform to build the layout engine and components on top of. Have you ever considered this? Or how does your approach compare to that of ebitengine? Did you try (and do you position) your library to build custom UI for some underpowered computers such as Raspberry Pi?
can I run it on Android? iOS?
no? then 99.999999% of real world users cannot access it. and if it is desktop oly, what is the point? it is no better than web.
swiftcoder•59m ago
I wonder how long till they pivot away from this belief. I feel like everyone in UI goes through this phase as some point, but in the end it doesn't scale to truly complicated UI
hsn915•55m ago
gen2brain•12m ago
cosmic_cheese•34m ago