frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

UK Tokenization Roadmap Puts £33B on the Table and a Clock on the Wall

https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/14/uk-tokenization-roadmap-puts-33-billion-on-the-table...
1•emsidisii•1m ago•0 comments

Mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine

https://github.com/mensfeld/code-on-incus
1•Tomte•5m ago•0 comments

Rethinking MCP Security: A Large-Scale Study of Runtime MCP Servers

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11086
1•sbulaev•7m ago•0 comments

Making Software: How to make a font

https://www.makingsoftware.com/chapters/how-to-make-a-font
2•Garbage•7m ago•0 comments

The bubble of the age; or, The fallacy of railway investment (1848) [pdf]

https://dn721608.ca.archive.org/0/items/bubbleofageorfal00smit/bubbleofageorfal00smit.pdf
1•rfv6723•7m ago•0 comments

Zig creator calls Bun's Claude Rust rewrite 'unreviewed slop'

https://www.theregister.com/devops/2026/07/14/zig-creator-calls-buns-claude-rust-rewrite-unreview...
1•giamma•9m ago•1 comments

The Noise Floor of Latent Dissent, Interview with Harry Halpin Founder of NymVPN

https://diffractionscollective.com/2026/04/30/the-noise-floor-of-revolt-harry-halpin/
1•hansvs•10m ago•1 comments

JPEG for ASTC

https://github.com/BinomialLLC/basis_universal/wiki/JPEG-for-ASTC
1•edflsafoiewq•14m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: US Equivalent of Anabin?

1•xqb64•16m ago•0 comments

Introduction to Mainframe Scripting Languages

https://zubairidrisaweda.medium.com/introduction-to-mainframe-scripting-languages-83c1edd86e3e
1•rbanffy•16m ago•0 comments

Can a Dozen Blue States Block the Paramount-Warner Merger?

https://www.wsj.com/business/media/can-a-dozen-blue-states-block-the-paramount-warner-merger-494e...
2•JumpCrisscross•17m ago•0 comments

OSHotspot – Linux WiFi hotspot manager (hostapd/dnsmasq/iptables)

https://github.com/King03-sam/OSHotspot
2•OLOJEDE•17m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How do you manage your own recovery time?

1•julienreszka•20m ago•0 comments

Grok Build CLI accused of uploading Git repos to a Google Cloud bucket

https://twitter.com/i/status/2076689215258014069
1•maxloh•20m ago•0 comments

UTC and Atomic Time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time
1•5701652400•23m ago•3 comments

Show HN: I audited my own eight repos. Half of them lied in the README

https://github.com/Wasserpuncher/readme-check
1•Wasserpuncher•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Retire Me – crowdfunding one designer's escape from sensible

https://www.retireme.xyz/
1•ArashLowni•26m ago•0 comments

Closing a three-year-old issue using Rust arenas

https://giacomocavalieri.me/writing/gleam-rust-arenas
1•birdculture•26m ago•0 comments

Hassabis – A Framework for Frontier AI and the Dawning of a New Age

https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/2076957440109625718
1•asiergoni•28m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Turnitin Report – AI checker and AI detector for student papers

https://www.turnitin.report/
1•gigisss•30m ago•0 comments

Jimmy Soni – Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and the PayPal Mafia [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEcOUgXvz7g
1•ronfriedhaber•30m ago•0 comments

Native SDK from Vercel

https://native-sdk.dev/
2•orixilus•32m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Coura AI – AI clothes changer for realistic outfit photos

https://coura.ai
1•gigisss•32m ago•0 comments

Canada's Dead Sea? Diving into Saskatchewan's Salty Secret

https://canadiangeographic.ca/articles/canadas-dead-sea-diving-into-saskatchewans-salty-secret/
2•thunderbong•37m ago•0 comments

Worship me at the office altar: Why narcissistic leaders resist remote work

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597826000300
3•andyjohnson0•38m ago•0 comments

TSMC Spies Got 10 Years. Taiwan's AI Basic Act Has No Penalties at All

https://mrkt30.com/tsmc-spies-got-10-years-taiwans-ai-basic-act-has-no-penalties-at-all/
2•emsidisii•40m ago•0 comments

The gap between CPU and GPU was always software

https://zenodo.org/records/21352974
1•thelibrebob•41m ago•0 comments

The EasyJet Takeover: Can Apollo Own a European Airline?

https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/14/the-easyjet-takeover-can-apollo-actually-own-a-europ...
1•emsidisii•45m ago•0 comments

Strait of Hormuz Tensions Weigh on Chinese Stocks as Oil Surges

https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/14/strait-of-hormuz-tensions-weigh-on-chinese-stocks-as...
1•emsidisii•45m ago•0 comments

Scanline edge-flag algorithm for antialiasing [pdf]

https://mlab.taik.fi/~kkallio/antialiasing/EdgeFlagAA.pdf
1•xqb64•46m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

European "age verification" "app" forcing everyone to use Android or iOS

https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-doc-technical-specification/discussions/19
97•roundabout-host•1h ago

Comments

roundabout-host•43m ago
Regardless of whether you personally use Android or iOS, I think that we can all agree that it is not right to be forced to use a specific platform in order to access almost any Internet services.
Aaargh20318•41m ago
This is only an issue if it's the only way of verifying your age. If it's still accessible to everyone and this makes it significantly easier for 99.9999999% of people then why not?
choo-t•13m ago
Easier than… not using age verification ?

It's not like it's a feature for you the end user, it doesn't solve any of your problems, on the contrary, it creates new ones.

Beijinger•43m ago
I am not a fan of such an "app". But the app is, as far as I understand, for things like Facebook, TikTok etc.

Are there any other Operating Systems than iOS, Android or Android flavors?

WebOS was nice but who is still using this? Symbian? Can you even use Social Media Apps with another phone OS?

troupo•40m ago
> Are there any other Operating Systems than iOS, Android or Android flavors?

I remember a gov.uk team presentation. They had a usecase of someone using a PS Vita to access a government assistance program because that was the only device they had access to.

Among 450 million people in the EU there are definitely more OSes than just latest versions of iOS and Android.

uniq7•39m ago
> Are there any other Operating Systems than iOS, Android or Android flavors

Yes, there are many more: GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, *BSD, etc.

This will prevent people who only own a computer and not a modern iOS/Android smartphone from accessing services and platforms.

This also sets a very strong anti-competition pressure. Which company will try now to invest on developing a new OS for smartphones if we already know users will not be able to access the most popular services & platforms with it?

anthk•28m ago
Well, that would boost up torrent and sites and places like Usenet and IRC with no age verification at all. English speakers can just use overseas servers (or non-UE services such as the ones in Switzerland). And maybe Usenet servers outside the US too.

Spanish speakers in Spain will just register services in Latinamerica sites with a VPN. Despite the dialect differences, non-jargon Spanish it's understood everywhere and once they got their user registered they can switch the country anytime.

Distros like Trisquel will just set their sites and mirrors outside the EU. And, well, if they provide a portable torrent client for Windows among the torrent the law would be utterly broken.

sebtron•37m ago
> Are there any other Operating Systems than iOS, Android or Android flavors?

Like Windows, MacOS and Linux?

iLoveOncall•41m ago
I agree with the sentiment but is there even any phone that doesn't run Android (or derivatives) or iOS and that can install modern "apps"?
hahahaa•40m ago
Run linux?
_factor•39m ago
This will ensure there never is.
sebtron•35m ago
Why does it have to be a phone? Some people still use tablets, laptops and, believe it or not, desktop PCs.
xienze•14m ago
Smartphones are much more ubiquitous than any of those devices. Across all demographics.
lexlambda•31m ago
You must realize, age verification is for more then just Googles Android apps.

Such a strong new legal framework must consider consumer hardware actually in use:

- Android variations Like GrapheneOS, Huawei's HarmonyOS, older phones running custom ROMs - Linux phones, which are sold in the EU and by EU companies

- Desktop operating systems

All of them can run Web Apps, and thus need age verification

amelius•40m ago
Isn't there a niche platform that can sue the hell out of the EU here?
sschueller•40m ago
Two platforms that are not owned by companies in the EU. Effectively handing the keys to your state ID to private foreign enterprise.

What will you do when Apple/Google or the US Government effective immediately delete/block your app? The impact initially may be small but after a few years if widely used, you can break a country.

Scaled•27m ago
Another juicy threat vector is forcing the app stores to stealthily ship a modified version of the app that sends copies of the IDs and/or tracking data to US intelligence services.

(Reminder: we know Persona's verification software already shares verification data with the federal government. It's a leap to modifying other apps, but within the realm of possibility of US government power. There is absolutely desire from them to gather blackmail material on politically important people, and age verification systems connected to adult sites/apps are a great way to do it)

gobip•38m ago
Don't fall for the trap. The question isn't how we should technically force age verification on anybody. The question is why they're pushing it onto everyone. I did not consent to this, neither did you.
ilumanty•34m ago
Yes, I said it before and I will say it again: We should invest our energy in the discussion whether to implement it and not already wonder how to implement it.

Shifting this question benefits only those who want to force this upon us.

tikkabhuna•5m ago
Doesn't the "how to implement" determine whether to implement it? A poor implementation shouldn't be done, but a good implementation could make it simpler for companies to verify the ages of users, limit information passed to companies, offer a quality of life improvement for users.
spaqin•34m ago
Funny how the worry of "digital exclusion" of the elders who would never be able to use a smartphone has been thrown out of the window in recent years.
shevy-java•26m ago
That's because they are lying to the people here. Just look at the "we must protect the children" lobbyists. It has never been about the children in the first place, that is just the convenient lie to force an authoritarian system in place.
g-b-r•34m ago
It should be stressed that Play Integrity also requires having a Google account and logging in to it on the phone.
perching_aix•34m ago
I guess it's that time of the week again. Do we have a sockpuppet account to welcome in you by any chance?

The complaint in the thread appears to have been resolved already (which would make sense given this is old news):

> In the README, the following is listed:

>> App and device verification based on Google Play Integrity API and Apple App Attestation

The README.md does not appear to feature such a section (nor any of the other files for that matter).

Separately, the title is editorializing and falsely suggests there's some big bad EU app, even though the app that does exist is merely a reference implementation, not for end user usage. There's a reason the repository you're linking a discussion thread from only holds specs.

kubo6472•29m ago
Yeah, I am leaning towards never to use anything that is forced to implement any kind of age verification.
shevy-java•27m ago
Well, they could change the laws to force people into slavery here, e. g. by forcing them to use US corporations ("if you do not have an app from Google store, you are excluded from society"). In that case they see age sniffing as ultimate tool of spying on everyone, so this is probably the real goal. What we all can see is that this has never been about children - they are just abused as the red hering here.
shevy-java•28m ago
What baffles me the most is how the EU commission constantly works in favour of US corporations in the long run. This is really strange. Something does not work in the explanations given by the EU commission. To me it looks like US lobbyists run the EU here.
xienze•16m ago
Well, they really, really, really want the end game of tying (real) identity to digital identity. And they want it now, not 10+ years in the future when _theoretically_ there _might_ be some EU-friendly mobile operating system that everyone uses. Right now, Google and Apple are basically the entire smartphone market, so they gotta work with what they've got if they want these plans to come to fruition.
blop•28m ago
This is the elephant in the room regarding the big "digital sovereignty" talks in the EU. For the moment in the EU institutions the focus is mostly at the post-acceptance stage that everything must eventually migrate off US clouds. There is still some denial and hope that things will go back to "before" because it's going to be extremely costly to migrate, but at least high level EU civil servants start to see the strategic value of moving out.

However there is ZERO talk about mobile platforms... No alternative solution like linux for the desktop, no money or care given to the few alternative that tentatively exist, and zero talk about forcing companies (at least for the ones shipping android phones) to open up their firmwares and allow users to install alternative OS if they want to sell in the EU.

So whilst the backend guys more or less got the memo about sovereignty, I think there is still a lot of educational work to do regarding end user devices and what kind of digital slavery hole we're digging ourselves in...

cbg0•26m ago
Isn't AOSP a thing?
spwa4•20m ago
You mean giving China control over it?

(because you still need the hardware made, and it's not like the EU commission is even prepared to fix BSPs for that hardware)

The EU has endlessly sold critical infrastructure to US, India and China while actively sabotaging efforts to rebuild it and now want it back - for free. This is criticized as having a low chance of success, as well as being a pretty unreasonable demand.

notabotiswear•19m ago
Writings on the wall can’t be clearer on AOSP’s future…
jchw
skrebbel•26m ago
I agree wholeheartedly with the argument raised in this github issue, but I think people are wrong to be skeptical about the concept of a government-issued age verification app.

Thing is, the status quo is absolutely worse. My 13yo son likes making Roblox games. Suddenly, some months ago, Roblox made a change where you’re not allowed to share your games with friends unless you do “age verification”, apparently in some misguided bid to beat the pedos. In Roblox’ case, this means sharing your 3D likeness with some sketchy American business who pinky promises to delete said data after. I don’t want random American tech companies to have my kids’ biometric info like that, able to sell it to whoever asks. Nor my passport or anything like that.

I’d much prefer a government supplied app, that’s guaranteed to protect my privacy, and has no business incentive to sell my data, where I can see what data about me (or my son) is shared with Roblox or whichever sleazy business wants it.

Obviously this only makes sense if the government is less sleazy than the average American tech business, but for all its faults, I think that currently holds for the EU (and most of its member countries). There’s plenty precedent of EU governments doing privacy-conscious apps right (the Dutch covid tracking app comes to mind).

I hope they see reason and fix this here issue.

knorker•19m ago
Funny you use Netherlands as a good example, considering that famously, their existing unusually thorough registry was super helpful for the Nazis rounding up jews later.

I don't think it's Godwin's Law when you are so spot on, exactly describing the worst case.

tikkabhuna•8m ago
Why would an age verification app need to know your ethnicity/religion?

Governments likely already know your name, age, place of birth, so having an app with a standard API for verifying users isn't giving the government additional data.

snottynose
Erikun•16m ago
Im confused, the github discussion says that the README says

App and device verification based on Google Play Integrity API and Apple App Attestation

But I can't find that anywhere. Am I missing something?

cynicalsecurity•3m ago
Why the hell EU even needs an age verification app? Who's genius idea is this and what for?
lexlambda•35m ago
as far as I'm aware, Adroid is not the same as the requirement here, which requires specific Google attestation.

There is GrapheneOS, HarmonyOS by Huawei, LineageOS for older phones and many more Android ROMs.

Additionally, Linux phones exist and are already sold in the EU to consumers, not just a prototype.

There's really no justification around limiting the OS selection.

There is also Linux, Windows, MacOS and many more operatint system not limited to phones.

ThatMedicIsASpy•29m ago
I'm on SailfishOS since a couple of years
hogwasher•4m ago
Yes. LineageOS, GrapheneOS, Arch, Sailfish, various other open distros, Windows Phone, and a surprising number of random proprietary options (these are sometimes based on Android, and have some social media apps, but can't run regular Android apps that weren't specifically designed or altered for it) including for modern dumbphones. There are always more over time, too.

There's also old versions of iOS and Android. We don't want to end up in a situation where people are locked into one of only two vendors and can be forced to keep buying the newest model to use an ID app that only supports the most recent software. That'd be even worse for the environment than the current disposable smartphone culture.

Everything to do with the age verification push is corrupt and stupid to begin with. There isn't even a legitimate cause behind all this for forcing ANY app, even if it didn't also force people to buy a specific, expensive, privacy-invading American product.

•
4m ago
This app requires Google Play. AOSP alone won't cut it.
mytailorisrich•16m ago
Because this is all a political move. This so-called "EU sovereignty" drive is in fact aimed at further reducing sovereignty of the member states via further transfer of power and control to the EU.

These digital ID wallets do exactly that. Member states lose control of the ID infrastructure, which will now be controlled by the EU. There isn't much sovereignty left at national level...

•
2m ago
It is one extra attack vector. Considering there is a data leak every week, it is apparent we cannot trust any organization to handle any datum securely. It has gotten to the point where I now consider every piece of information compromised and sold on the dark web as soon as I am forced to transfer it to a third party, because those are the odds.
snottynose•7m ago
Not necessary to hearken back so far in history. In our present age the intelligence services consistently do not respect privacy rights of citizens, even when they are legally bound to.

https://www-bitsoffreedom-nl.translate.goog/2026/07/06/aivd-...

choo-t•15m ago
You can (and should) be mad at the government and at Roblox at the same time.

Also, don't use Roblox, you can freely share games made with PICO-8, Löve, Godot, Rpgmaker, Game maker and the like, no need to go to the hell scape that is Roblox and its dark patern and locked down ecosystem.

pibaker•10m ago
None of the engines you mentioned are nearly as approachable as roblox when it comes to making a 3D game with little programming or art skills.

Don't get me wrong. I agree roblox is a very shady operation, but that does not erase the fact that their platform is unmatched when it comes to letting kids make games.

pjc50•14m ago
> a government supplied app, that’s guaranteed to protect my privacy

This is a bit of a 64,000 euro question, though. Look very closely at what the government exemptions for GDPR are.

em500•7m ago
Government issued versus corporate issued age verification is a false dichotomy. There are other options, such as refusing games that require them. (Yes, we do have a teen, and yes we did exactly that with Roblox.)