frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Sovereign-Metal – Zero-Dependency Python/Metal GPGPU Advection

https://github.com/getcognition-online/sovereign-metal
1•Jamie_Nixx_CUI•23s ago•0 comments

US data center protests go national as backlash grows

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/us-data-center-protests-go-national-backlash-gro...
1•vrganj•1m ago•0 comments

Elixir-lang.org has a new design

https://elixir-lang.org/
1•bbg2401•4m ago•1 comments

Multidim inplace permutations in constant(*) space

https://cschen.cc/posts/inplace-permdims/
2•FacelessJim•5m ago•0 comments

Young women who go to North Lake Tahoe's beaches are shallow heightists

1•AnonymousAProb•5m ago•1 comments

How voice-to-voice models work: from sound wave to living conversation

https://asaptf.github.io/v2v-models-article-en/
1•asaptf•6m ago•0 comments

Official Jagex Launcher for Linux

https://secure.runescape.com/m=news/jagex-launcher-for-linux-beta-out-now?oldschool=1
1•Venn1•7m ago•1 comments

What else do people draw on gradient.horse?

https://rybakov.com/blog/what_else_do_people_draw_on_gradient-copy.horse/
1•spython•7m ago•0 comments

Traders are increasingly betting against SpaceX just weeks after IPO

https://www.ft.com/content/2b96703d-440b-46db-8d86-9fff9ecc59d5
1•ethanhawksley•10m ago•1 comments

Run all your sites SEO on autopilot

https://boldpilot.club
2•Utopyasz•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Du, honest – an APFS-clone-aware disk usage analyzer

https://github.com/cheapsteak/duh
1•cheapsteak•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Jelly NYC, Experiment with Box3D

https://jellynyc.vercel.app/
1•kriz9•17m ago•0 comments

Narcissistic leaders more likely to oppose remote work, new research suggests

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/study-remote-work-narcissism-9.7275176
2•uladzislau•19m ago•0 comments

Show HN: PrimeTask, an offline-first work OS with BYO AI through MCP

https://www.primetask.app/
1•vxvaptor•20m ago•0 comments

Coding agent for local models on a Mac

https://mlx-optiq.com/blog/optiq-code
1•codelion•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Q3Edit – Edit and play Quake 3 maps in the browser

https://q3edit.com
1•drdator•24m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Sol Learned Design Taste

https://notes.designarena.ai/how-openais-sol-finally-learned-design-taste/
1•gmays•26m ago•0 comments

British runner Josh Kerr breaks world record for mile which stood for 27 years

https://news.sky.com/story/british-runner-josh-kerr-breaks-world-record-for-mile-which-had-stood-...
5•austinallegro•28m ago•0 comments

Build: Mobile-First AI Creation on Roblox

https://about.roblox.com/newsroom/2026/07/build-without-limits-on-roblox
1•nyku•29m ago•0 comments

British runner Josh Kerr breaks 27-year-old world record in the mile

https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a73175937/josh-kerr-breaks-mile-world-record/
3•rappatic•30m ago•0 comments

A Simple P/E Valuation Model that Works

https://www.safalniveshak.com/simple-pe-valuation-model/
1•akbarnama•31m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Teya – Open‑source AI family agent on a wall‑mounted Android phone

https://github.com/adgapar/teya
1•AdiletGaparov•32m ago•0 comments

I tested Gisia against real-world .gitlab-ci.yml files – it just works

1•okoddcat•33m ago•0 comments

Tract Postmortem (2025)

https://buildwithtract.com/
1•dukeyukey•38m ago•0 comments

The scientific case for eating more bones

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/health/article/eating-bones-nutrition-health
1•YeGoblynQueenne•41m ago•0 comments

EU will force Google to share search data and open up AI on Android

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/07/its-official-eu-will-force-google-to-share-search-data-an...
5•akyuu•42m ago•1 comments

DBUF Encoding and Protocol

https://github.com/bintoca/dbuf
1•pierogitus•42m ago•0 comments

Terminal Bean Soup

https://blog.davep.org/2026/07/17/terminal-bean-soup.html
1•lemonberry•43m ago•0 comments

Reasonably Isolated NixOS Desktop MicroVM Framework

https://github.com/vicondoa/d2b
3•tour2026•44m ago•0 comments

Panchanga Tantra: The Magic of the Indic Calendar System

https://aksh.ai/posts/panchanga-tantra/panchanga_tantra.html
1•lioeters•47m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

EU ban on destruction of unsold clothes and shoes enters into application

https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/ban-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-enters-application-2026-07-17_en
53•robtherobber•1h ago

Comments

cassianoleal•49m ago
How long until they start shipping those abroad where they will become toxic bonfires?
wolvoleo•43m ago
That can be penalised too.

We really have to get away from the idea that curtailing intentional industrial waste production is futile. Perhaps in American style capitalism it is because the system is rigged and the biggest money bag always wins. But we don't want this here at all.

We have to get forward as humanity and treat our planet with respect. Otherwise we won't have one worth living on. Making money isn't the only thing that counts.

graemep•33m ago
I agree we should, but that does not mean that a particular regulation is the right way to do it. Its very hard to close loopholes and exploitation of exemptions.
ChrisLTD•30m ago
You have to start somewhere, no? We have laws against stealing and murder and folks don’t usually go around saying they should be removed from the books because some people still steal and commit murder.
graemep•15m ago
Yes, but those laws are pretty effective. They do deter murderers and thieves, and take them out of society so they cannot repeat their offences.

Ill thought out regulations can make things worse - I am convinced this is the case for the UK's Online Safety Act, for example. That (and the proposed ban on social media for under 16s) is also promoted on "we must do something" grounds.

I am very much in favour of some proposed changes under the law - e.g. improving repairability and reusability of some product categories.

I have doubts that some discouragement of destruction of new products fixes the big underlying problem with clothing: the production of cheap junk not designed to last. Under these regulations (at least as summarised in the article), they offer it to charity, charity rejects it, then they are free to destroy it.

sorokod•29m ago
Naming and shaming is a reasonable first step.
amelius•21m ago
We need judges that don't just look at the letter of the law. We can already use computers for that.
wiz21c•43m ago
At least they're trying.
Hackbraten•31m ago
That loophole has become very difficult:

https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/...

xnx•30m ago
Is this a problem in the EU? I often think in terms of home remodels that a family might do at least once. Those can easily fill a dumpster with tons of garbage. That's much more waste than a family could ever generate directly or indirectly in clothing.
embedding-shape•26m ago
> I often think in terms of home remodels that a family might do at least once

Very interesting point of view, as someone who never done a home remodel, it surely brought a new perspective for me.

> That's much more waste than a family could ever generate directly or indirectly in clothing.

I'm not sure, if you have two kids who are into trendy clothing and you're able to let them make choices around clothing, then I can imagine that there is quite high turnover on those things.

Besides, the proposed rules seems to try to address waste generated by businesses rather than individuals or families. I guess currently they throw outdated clothing in order to make space for the new clothing lines?

pcdevils•24m ago
It's companies dumping unsold ranges of clothes as new ranges come in. Not people.
ascorbic•24m ago
This is about businesses, not families.
Stromgren•21m ago
My dad worked at a logistics facility, the amount of perfume he took home was ridiculous - and you’d think that something like perfume would never go stale. It does from a brand perspective and they do everything they can to have it destroyed so it doesn’t end up being sold to prices that would hurt the perceptive value. Obviously he wasn’t allowed to take it either.
amazingamazing•28m ago
Why would this ever happen? Is it cheaper to destroy than sell at discount?
thaumasiotes•26m ago
> Is it cheaper to destroy than sell at discount?

Yes.

ascorbic•25m ago
Yes, clothing companies and stores will very commonly destroy clothes if they determine that selling at a discount would undermine the brand value. They do things like cutting holes in the soles of shoes before discarding them.
thrance•22m ago
> The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath

embedding-shape•24m ago
Some stuff you basically have to give away for people to buy, some stuff just isn't so attractive to most people. With limited store space, you could miss out on profits if you don't update what you have available. Every item you carry is another item you cannot fit to carry.
tancop•15m ago
some places already do this for food where anything thats after sell by date but still safe to eat has to be donated to a food bank.

i think it should be expanded to cover more categories than food and clothes when reuse and recycling infra grows to take the demand. its not just good for the environment it also prevents producers from restricting supply to keep their profits high.

the ultimate goal is make it illegal to destroy or intentionally damage anything usable before it reaches consumers. that would create a new ecosystem of discount stores and giveaway centers, and save everyone a ton of money.

Saline9515•13m ago
It looks like a great opportunity for mafia networks to get paid by clothing brands in order to dispose of the stocks.
iammjm•11m ago
Great! “Fashion” is capitalism’s toxic way of having people discard perfectly good clothes and buy new ones every 12 months. It’s stupid, wasteful, and disgusting
hiAndrewQuinn•7m ago
This isn't really surprising in a low margin industry. If you are making a 2% margin on the average perfume bottle, and then you liquidate it at -3% because it's cheaper than destroying it, you can accidentally end up anchoring customer perceptions on a price with like a -1% margin which actually will destroy the business over time.

High margin industries get more complicated to model, of course.

phoronixrly•5m ago
Perfume? Low-margin?
comrade1234•2m ago
I lived in a small building along with a French family with 5 children. The amount of trash they had every week was incredible. We had our small trash bag and theirs would be a heap of bags chest high. I sometimes wondered if he was throwing out trash from his business too.

While living there the system changed from paying for a disposal service to pre-buying special bags that cost around 2.50chf per 35L bag. The French family moved back to France within a couple of months.

close04•23m ago
Particularly for “luxury” brands as selling at a discount devalues the brand. I use quotes because most of those brands sell the same cheap crap as everyone else (double digit manufacturing cost using forced labor [0]) but with a fancy logo making them worth 4 figures.

[0] Better link: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2025/jul/24/made-in-ital...

hawk_•23m ago
Selling cheaper cannibalizes next season's fashion.
vrganj•21m ago
Luxury brands don't want the poors to be seen wearing their merchandise.

It hurts brand perception.

artisinal•19m ago
If the full price is €6, there isn’t much room for a discount. Destroying and freeing up store space for something that does sell can easily be profitable.
kryptiskt•13m ago
I think this largely is about brand protection. They worry that discounting the clothes means they will just cannibalize sales of that brand's full-price clothes.
thibaut_barrere•3m ago
Artificial scarcity + the urge to impose fashion cycles, sadly