frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Don't Take the Black Pill (Text Adaptation)

https://andrewkelley.me/post/dont-take-black-pill.html
1•Tomte•2m ago•0 comments

Shadscan – Deterministic UI Audits for Shadcn Apps

https://github.com/TheOrcDev/shadscan
1•javatuts•4m ago•0 comments

MapLibre GL JavaScript – WebGL library for interactive vector maps

https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/
1•javatuts•4m ago•0 comments

Will Self-Hosted Local AI Go Mainstream, or Stay a Niche for Nerds?

https://grigio.org/will-self-hosted-local-ai-go-mainstream-or-stay-a-niche-for-nerds/
1•grigio•5m ago•0 comments

JavaScript Obfuscator

https://www.jstools.space/js-obfuscator/
1•javatuts•5m ago•0 comments

GPUs could explode to multiple TB with new storage-inspired memory tech

https://www.theregister.com/storage/2026/07/30/gpus-could-explode-to-multiple-tb-with-new-storage...
2•jacquesm•7m ago•0 comments

An internal OpenAI Astra model solved 10 major open math and CS problems

https://twitter.com/polynoamial/status/2083467194663571701
2•wa5ina•12m ago•0 comments

I'm (mostly) picking models on speed now, not intelligence

https://martinalderson.com/posts/speed-vs-intelligence/
1•martinald•14m ago•0 comments

BroMetal: Typed shaders compiled at build time to WebGPU

https://brometal.dev
1•davedx•17m ago•0 comments

Only 8.9% of sites block AI crawlers, but 94.8% are never cited in AI answers

https://website-auditor.io/ai-visibility-index
1•SpikeyCoder•19m ago•0 comments

When did 'dupe culture' take over?

https://news.darden.virginia.edu/2026/08/01/qa-when-did-dupe-culture-take-over/
1•bookofjoe•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LyricVibe – synced lyrics for YouTube Music, Spotify, SoundCloud

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lyricvibe-—-kinetic-lyric/iplhipppjgpeofmadbnkolnpigia...
1•riteshzz•23m ago•0 comments

Best way to avoid bloat and AI – selfcontaining OS

4•bialamusic•26m ago•0 comments

Getopt() but Friendlier

https://www.unix.dog/~yosh/blog/getopt-but-friendlier.html
2•fanf2•31m ago•0 comments

Meshdiff – visually compare two STL versions in the browser, client-side

https://meshdiff.com/
10•projscope•38m ago•0 comments

Size of Xbox price increase in Europe shocks

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Size-of-Xbox-price-increase-in-Europe-shocks-giving-Sony-s-PS5-cons...
2•HelloUsername•40m ago•1 comments

Pdf-inspector: Rust lib for PDF inspection, classification, and text extraction

https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector
2•7777777phil•40m ago•1 comments

Stripe for Wearable Data

https://stridee.fit/developer
2•alvaromolina0•41m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What's Your BHAG?

2•sudo_cowsay•42m ago•0 comments

NIST Develops New Standards to Safeguard Computers Against Quantum Threats

https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/quantum-computers-may-put-internet-traffic-risk-nist-sa...
2•birdculture•46m ago•0 comments

Wikimedia Foundation refuses union recognition, hires union-busting law firm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2026-08-02/News_and_notes
33•akolbe•49m ago•4 comments

Show HN: Fuse – statically typed functional programming language

https://fuselang.org
3•the_unproven•49m ago•0 comments

The Patch Paradox

https://whiletruelearn.dev/essays/patch-paradox/
2•krishnasangeeth•56m ago•0 comments

Bash Aliases

https://github.com/ctrlaltvikas/Awesome-Bash-Aliases
2•vikaskyadav•56m ago•1 comments

Twenty-Four Years of Wiki Engines

https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/08/02/1130
2•rcarmo•57m ago•0 comments

Everything about my smart home and homelab setup

https://swiftrocks.com/everything-about-my-smart-home-and-homelab-setup
2•rockbruno•57m ago•0 comments

The Invariant Is Hiding

https://yusufaytas.com/the-invariant-is-hiding
8•yusufaytas•58m ago•0 comments

Auto Publishing with Lerobit: A Comprehensive Guide for Small Businesses

https://www.lerobit.com/blog/unlock-auto-publishing-lerobit-guide
2•akliluart•1h ago•0 comments

Impro is a handbook for running a cult

https://www.seangoedecke.com/impro/
3•swah•1h ago•0 comments

LLMs Discover P=NP (Comic)

https://chatgpt.com/s/m_6a6f252612a08191b4081f60a92bceba
2•stagas•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Generative AI floods and dilutes the market for books

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20349
23•theanonymousone•1h ago

Comments

jdw64•28m ago
Why do people use Gen AI for writing? What's the motivation? For academic papers, it's probably citation metrics and the number of publications. For novels, it's likely economic factors. If those factors disappear, would people still use Gen AI for writing?
podgietaru•25m ago
Get rich quick scams, this market existed before GenAI. They’d hire ghost writers, and then put them on audible.

Now it’s easier than ever. So the market explodes. But it makes legit writers harder to find. Its bleak.

_diyar•22m ago
Even if all extrinsic motivations for writing disappear, some people will continue to write (without AI) for personal reasons.

And even at that point, others will continue to write using AI to simulate being one of those people.

quikoa•5m ago
Some people may continue using AI and publish books but the amount of AI slop would be dramatically lower without extrinsic motivations.
sieve•4m ago
I have hundreds of plot ideas from 40 years of reading and watching crappy books and films/tv. Never had the time or energy to explore those. LLMs let me try out various plots. To see which ones work and which don't. I haven't really thought about publishing anything though. Too much work and bureaucracy.

The thing is ... ideas matter just as much as the writing. You cannot simply say: "Hey Claude, write me a Sherlock Holmes pastiche set in the bronze age."

I have found that a 1:4 to 1:8 ratio gives nice results. That is, for every 4-8 paras of expected output, you must provide 1 para worth of character detail, plot beats etc. So you would need 100-200 pages of your own writing to produce 800 pages worth.

But most people are lazy. So the output is too.

epolanski•2m ago
But why would I want to read that?

Just give me the prompt at this point.

grey-area•1m ago
It’s easier than actually writing which is very hard to do well; authors spend years working on books.

Doesn’t really matter what the original motivation was (money, reputation, fame), people will use LLMs as a shortcut to generate text, and we’re all poorer because of it.

MasterScrat•27m ago
I don’t see how this market ("mostly" AI-written books) won’t get arbitraged to death with the cheaper and open-weight models that keep coming out
grey-area•14m ago
The problem is not about money it is that we are made massively culturally poorer by the flood of ahistorical, amoral, incoherent, rococco, contradictory yet plausible shit produced by LLMs.

Both the internet and books have been flooded with ‘content’ which appears like human content but has no coherence or intention to it and tends to fall apart completely the longer form the story.

Even our autocomplete is being infected with LLM suggestions, distorting and guiding how people write.

This is a VERY significant problem for our culture long term.

encrux•3m ago
I don’t see any other way past this other than regulation:

We need authenticated online spaces where your account is linked to a real, government issued ID. This way, moderating content becomes feasible again. Bans will hold value, since you can’t just create new accounts all the time. I predict people will gravitate towards authenticated markets (and social media).

I for one am sick and tired of second guessing every text I‘m reading, at least give me someone to hold accountable.

bakugo•1m ago
Sounds like everything is proceeding according to plan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY

altmanaltman•
epolanski•4m ago
For any kind of online entertainment really.

The overwhelming majority of content on Youtube is also plagued by AI.

You're 6 minutes in a documentary about Russo-Ottoman wars and only then you start noticing something's wrong, paintings are made up, the voice sounds similar to voices of other videos and the script has an odd non-human character to it.

Then you dig into it, and indeed it's a bunch of crap prompts glued together on top of some lame ai-generated internet research.

rvz•4m ago
This is what "Abundance" is.
bryanlarsen•2m ago
The market for books has been flooded far before AI. Millions of books are published each year, many more self published and unpublished. Sturgeon's law (90% of everything is crud) predates AI by many decades.

You need a mechanism to filter out the crud. There are many, some better than others.

8m ago
the market they analyse is specifically self-published fiction. Most of the traditionally published books are not AI generated and they make significantly more money as a category than self publishing does. It is not really possible to flood that market in this form with 0 entry barriers.

So yes, allowing AI slop in a market where anyone can publish anything and quality is not a very strict criteria, of course it will dillute the market. But we are unlikely to see this shift in traditional publishing houses.

grey-area•3m ago
$2m crime novel deal collapses amid questions over AI use

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/jul/31/crime-novel-de...