Every company I see has an automated code review agent set up in their repository. It doesn't solve the code review problem. The automated review agents cannot be trusted the same way coding agents cannot be trusted.

They're very useful for finding bugs and edge cases you've missed, but they lack something only you have — "taste."

You have more context. You know the people, the business, and the product better than any coding agent. You know when an abstraction is unnecessary. You know what needs a comment. You know where to break the rules.

And, for that...

Nothing beats "reading" the code.

Problem is, reading code is not easy. It's even harder if your tools are designed for storing code rather than reading it.

That's why I built Guided Review. It's a chrome extension that converts your Github PR into a guided walkthrough so you can actually read code in clustered changes (not just big scrollable list of file changes in alphabetical order).