frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ohio Assembly members propose bill to regulate data center development

https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2026/08/06/ohio-general-assembly-members-propose-sweeping-bill-to-...
1•mapping365•18s ago•0 comments

AI Agents Think and Act: ReAct in 2 Minutes

https://vinithavn.substack.com/p/how-ai-agents-think-and-act-react
1•vinithavn01•55s ago•0 comments

Git Explain TUI – Explore Commits and Chat with Diffs

https://mmcs-work.github.io/git-explain-tui/
1•nemo_captain•1m ago•0 comments

Grand Theft Auto VI: An Extended Look Coming August 27

https://www.netflix.com/title/83035795
1•amichail•1m ago•0 comments

American farmers slid solar panels over 62,000 acres of farmland

https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/
1•speckx•1m ago•0 comments

Open-source agentic satellite anomaly detector with calibrated confidence

https://github.com/adoviguerav/esa-adb-trustworthy-agent
1•adoviguera•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: React Candlesticks – JSX composable Canvas charts for financial UIs

https://reactcandlesticks.com/demo/
1•jjjww•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Line9 - a Mermaid rendering engine with its own layout

https://line9.ai/diagram
1•jumpalongjim•2m ago•0 comments

A Portland Company Can Put Your Favorite Mixtape on Vinyl

https://www.wweek.com/culture/2026/05/05/a-portland-company-can-put-your-favorite-mixtape-on-vinyl/
1•voxadam•3m ago•0 comments

Drift, your new favorite Git Diff tool

https://github.com/aymanbagabas/drift
1•aymanbagabas•3m ago•0 comments

Why good developers should avoid working for Google

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-disadvantages-of-working-at-Google/answer/Rob-Menke?ch=15&oid=...
1•USTECH_WORKER•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Fursa, a live job index built from company career pages

https://fursa.io/search
1•kartikrajrewar•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: FormLab, a no-signup formulation lab notebook in the browser

https://lab.formvix.com/
1•juliu1980•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Science for Kids

https://science.ocaho.com/
1•rahimnathwani•5m ago•0 comments

AI generated over 95% of China's new microdramas in Q1 2026

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/ai-microdrama-china-film-industry-actors-jobs-6229191
4•qikouki•6m ago•0 comments

Faster floating point math with Rust's new API

https://pythonspeed.com/articles/faster-float-math-rust/
2•subset•7m ago•0 comments

What the Bubble Got Right (2004)

https://paulgraham.com/bubble.html
1•simonpure•10m ago•0 comments

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-Latent-Reasoning. A model thinking in latent space

https://blog.n.ichol.ai/packaging-latent-reasoning-as-a-real-model
1•nmitchko•11m ago•1 comments

The "design engineer" role should go beyond front-end

https://josefrichter.design/blog/design-engineer-password-input-validation
1•josefrichter•12m ago•0 comments

US beef prices have soared but farmers aren't making more money

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrv0k0j662o
2•tartoran•12m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Why don't we grade AI agents like hadith scholars graded narrators?

1•alizahidraja•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Islandr – WireGuard peers, users and group ACLs in one binary

https://github.com/chriscohnen/islandr
1•chriscohnen•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: OptiPipe: rule-based config advisor for dbt pipelines

https://opti-pipe.onrender.com/
1•dorfarber•14m ago•0 comments

Cyclospora outbreak follows years-long pattern of Taylor Farms deflecting blame

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/06/us/taylor-farms-cyclospora-ecoli-outbreaks-invs
1•randycupertino•15m ago•1 comments

The Wisdom of Crowds in Markets

https://www.morganstanley.com/content/dam/im/assets/publication/thought-leadership/consilient-obs...
1•gmays•16m ago•1 comments

Niven's Laws

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niven%27s_laws
3•1970-01-01•17m ago•0 comments

Microsoft's AI Sales Mostly Come from OpenAI, Disclosures Show

https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/microsoft-ai-sales-mostly-come-180651710.html
2•maxloh•17m ago•1 comments

"MTA-STS Policy Is Missing: STSFetchResult.NONE" What It Means and How to Fix It

https://dmarcguard.io/blog/mta-sts-policy-missing-fix/
1•meysamazad•19m ago•0 comments

I run a 9-model LLM council to write a financial newsletter. What breaks

https://marketdaily.ai/blog/eng-llm-council-judge-en-202608
1•delvinchang•20m ago•1 comments

Solar-Powered LoRa Meshtastic Device

https://specfive.com/products/specfive-voyager
1•DanielSusca•21m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Why Do Fewer Renters Expect to Move?

https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/08/why-do-fewer-renters-expect-to-move/
26•jnord•1h ago

Comments

cautiouscat•26m ago
It’s getting prohibitively expensive. Before brokers fees were banned in Boston, a $2,000/mo apartment could have cost you $8000 just to move in. That’s for first, last, security and brokers fee. That’s a worst case scenario but even just first and last months rent is $4000. It’s getting outrageous.
onlyrealcuzzo•11m ago
Way back when I started my career - I almost COULDN'T take a good job in Boston, because I couldn't figure out how I could literally live there long enough to get my first few paychecks to pay for my rent.

I decided that I'd just go into credit card debt and live in the crappiest hotel that I could find until I had enough money to pay the first/last/security deposit.

Luckily, I found some shady landlord on Craigslist that turned out to be pretty chill, and just let me move in without even paying until I had the money. Dude even picked me up from the airport and moved me right in. It was kind of a rip-off for a room, but it was furnished, and I wasn't going to be in a position to buy furniture for months, so it worked out for both of us for 6 months or so.

I do wonder... At what point does this start to impact who can and can't even move to your area for work? Have we already reached that point?

the_sleaze_•8m ago
Easy fix, the department of defense has been doing it for years in Southwest DC.

Just build corporate housing.

Then we can have little Amazon towns where all your needs are met and everyone lives in perfect harmony in downtown San Fransisco.

morkalork•4m ago
Could even include Amazon store credits in the compensation package!
the_sleaze_•3m ago
Toss in a robot that folds laundry and I'm in
inigyou•4m ago
As long as they stick to housing it could be an improvement over the status quo.

Vertical integration isn't that unethical if you religiously stick to only integrating what would otherwise suck.

willmadden•2m ago
Yes, then we can build a company store where the slav... er, "employees" can shop and discuss how to be more productive on their projects!
bobson381•23m ago
30 year mortgage is founded partly on the idea that your house will be worth more in the future when you sell it. That you can lock in a lower price now.

Number cannot always go up. We are at the top of the carbon pulse. Financialization has taken us far from the material baseline of the rock we are flying through space on. Debt will only get us so far.

For this and many other reasons, why would you believe a house "as an investment" is a reasonable thing to keep hoping for, especially 30 years from now? If you have even a reasonably stable rental, it's less risk exposure if you can save some money that isn't tied up in a down payment.

Yiin•20m ago
inflation disagrees with your premise, there is no reason why number can't always go up, there are plenty of countries that prove otherwise.
graceful6800•7m ago
Mathematics agrees with you, there are in fact infinitely many numbers.

Physics and reality do not. Once the number gets big enough it loses all practical value. Humans are not really built to reason about very large numbers. At some point you reach Zimbabwean inflation and your currency loses all value because everyone is paid in the trillions. Then you reset your currency back to lower numbers because that's what humans and their systems can handle.

So, no, the number cannot always go up. There is a practical ceiling beyond which numbers lose meaning and value.

inigyou•2m ago
There are some countries where a thousand or a million of their currency is worth a dollar. People just start thinking in thousands or millions.

Heck, the dollar is already it. What used to cost a penny now costs ten dollars. We just think in dollars and forget about the pennies.

philipwhiuk•21m ago
It's bizarre to me that this is all couched in "expect". This is a financial problem - they have the actual numbers to know whether the responses are rational.
129487•20m ago
Because you cannot pay market prices if you leave your rent controlled apartment. Once you are out, you never get one again.

Apparently that is beyond the high and mighty Federal Reserve employees who wrote this speculation.

The housing market needs to be socialized.

linkregister•14m ago
A socialized housing market replaces exorbitant prices with a lottery; public-subsidized housing in Stockholm has a waiting list of years. The way to stabilize the demand curve is to increase to supply.
jameshart•8m ago
A vanishingly small portion of the US rental market is rent controlled - fractions of one percent. In New York City there are only about 25,000 units that are actually rent controlled - tenants who have lived continuously since July 1, 1971 in a building built before 1947.

Rent stabilization - caps on how much landlords are permitted to increase rent - are also not that widespread. Washington DC is unusual in having over half of its rental stock covered by rent stabilization, but even in NYC less than half of the rental stock has stabilized rents.

lolnice•2m ago
Get off Reddit, there is no rent control. It's thousands a month, they got you by the balls
beezlebroxxxxxx•18m ago
Where I live, there's just a growing sense that rent and homeownership are wildly more expensive compared to what you get. Lack of development in the urban core has made moving anywhere else (cheaper) entail buying a car, dealing with commutes, etc. It has also made moving within the urban core significantly more expensive, especially with rent control pricing limiting availability. Basically, from a purely financial perspective, the juice (moving) is not really worth the squeeze.

The promises of WFH have also not come to fruition. The dream of moving anywhere and retaining your email job are not the reality in 2026. Employers seem actively hostile to that idea or are reneging on promises or claims that that "is the future".

hno5b8kgpg•8m ago
Sounds about right
whitelimetea•8m ago
If the Canadians finally leave and go back home the prices would drop.

They all get TN visas then only hire other Canadians (just like Indians, Canadians do the exact same thing).

They are 1000% responsible for driving the costs up in San Francisco.

burlesona•7m ago
Comparing to the 1980s maybe misses that the population was much younger then, and there’s still a general trend of people moving more when they’re younger and settling down when they’re older. I would have liked to see the data broken down by age cohorts.
danvoell•5m ago
I feel like US is too heavily weighted on incumbant "rent seeking" through law and policy. We were just in Tokyo and Seoul, the average costs of rents in New York City: ~$3,900 – $4,200 vs Tokyo: ~$1,200 – $1,350 and vs Seoul: ~$950 – $1,100. Renters will move if there are affordable newer options in cities instead of treating boomer asset holding rent seekers as a privileged class.
danvoell•3m ago
To add, renters not moving is a renter problem. It's a real estate owner benefit.
jmyeet•1m ago
So I'm Gen-X. Statistically speaking, I have more yesterdays than tomorrows. I can't even begin to describe how much of a dystopian hellscape the world has become and is becoming. Many my age describe the 1990s as the last good decade.

I lived in a 2 bedroom apartment in the 1990s for $200/month 3 miles from the city center. All my other expenses were less than another $200/month. The median house price was less than $80k. College graduate positions typically paid ~$30k but that was OK. This was pre-9/11 so all those old TV shows and movies you saw of people meeting people at the airport gate were very real. I've seen younger people think this was just a trope, like the 30 seconds the trace a call bit. No, that was real. Friends of a friend lived in Iowa and split a 4 bedroom house for $180/month. Not each, total.

For younger millenials and Gen-Z, I honestly wish you could've experienced this world, for no other reason than to see that things weren't always this way and don't have to be this way.

There's an old episode of the Cosby Show that had the father (Bill Cosby) teaching his son, Theo, about finances. It's funny watching it back now because it has the line "an apartment in Manhattan is going to cost you $400" and I remember thinking how expensive that sounded at the time.

The absolute worst thing that has happened is how hoarding housing has become a retirement plan. It's simply stealing from the next generation and it's absolutely strangling the economy. Society is fraying at the edges. For anyone interested, there's been academic work on this that falls under the label of "the housing theory of everything" eg [1].

But what I hate most is how cruel, selfish and stupid everybody seems to be getting, in part fuelled by increasing desperation to stay above the rising tide just a little bit longer. And the ultra-wealthy constantly throw gas on this fire and torch the planet for what? So they can have $200 billion instead of $100 billion? What good does that do you if there's nothing left? But what's crazy is that a third of the population will defend Jeff Bezos in this equation.

What you see in a lot of economic indicators (such as those posted here) can be read as people incradsingly see themselves as having no future. Continued consumer spending is not a sign of a healthy economy or optimism anymore. It's a sign of fatalism.

The entire thing is honestly deeply depressing.

[1]: https://worksinprogress.co/issue/the-housing-theory-of-every...

mono442•20m ago
Even if the house is worth less, the morgage is eventually paid off. Rent has to be paid forever.

I can't even imagine renting when I'm retired and have less money.

rootsudo•10m ago
I can, rent in cheap cost of living location. Why pay 600k+ usd to purchase in m-hcol when instead can live abroad during retirement and pay 1k/month and use the remaining for better living or health care or whatnot?
petcat•19m ago
You're falling for the trap of just thinking of buying a house as an investment.

Buying a house can be an investment, but it's also buying a place to live. Even if the home's value merely keeps pace with inflation over 30 years, you've converted a largely fixed housing payment into ownership rather than paying ever-increasing rent indefinitely.

Carrok•13m ago
Along the same lines, you are buying a place. A place that you own and can do whatever you like with. I spent twenty years renting and twenty years of feeling like you can’t hang a picture on the wall, paint a room, upgrade an appliance, or really do anything to improve your surroundings, tends to get tiring.
rogerrogerr•6m ago
Why can't you hang a picture on the wall? Fixing holes in drywall is super trivial, a good life skill to learn.
inigyou•3m ago
Is there a law saying your landlord has to accept the repair?
cauliflower2718•3m ago
Painting, too. Not sure how common or uncommon but my landlord explicitly allows painting, as long as it's not a dark color
doublerabbit•11m ago
I agree with this. The same goes for subscription cars. Default on the monthly payments and they take it away.

If you purchased a rust bucket of a car, you own it and if it all goes south you still have a roof over your head.

inigyou•3m ago
That isn't a trap if we're talking about how other people perceive things. You might want a place to live, but the houses are all owned by people who want investments, so for the purpose of explaining the housing market, they're investments.
recursivedoubts•3m ago
you are falling into the trap of thinking of a house as a maintenance-free place to live
fatnoah•3m ago
> Buying a house can be an investment, but it's also buying a place to live.

I'm a strong proponent of both owning and renting, and each has tradeoffs vs. the other. I've moved between renting and home ownership a couple times, and I appreciate the customizability of ownership along with the very real financial advantages.

On the other side, I've also enjoyed "freedom" of renting, where I didn't have to spend any additional time, energy, or money on maintenance tasks. In my HCOL part of the country, I could also afford the rent to live "downtown" when owning anything remotely similar was out of the question.

Your "also a place to live" line is fantastically underrated. When the housing market was flat or declining, I'd always get annoyed when people said something like "I've owned this house for 5 years, but now it's worth $20k less than when I bought it!". That also means if they sold it right now at that $20k "loss" then they effectively paid $333/month plus upkeep to live somewhere for 5 years!

msdz•18m ago
> If you have even a reasonably stable rental, it's less risk exposure if you can save some money that isn't tied up in a down payment.

Key word being “if”, IMO. What happens in the longer term if or when many renters’ “saved” money is slowly becoming less and less, contrasted with a presumably fixed or at least stable/predictable mortgage?

The reduced risk simply may not be worth it anymore because it doesn’t save you anything in monetary terms, or even costs you more. What happens then? Does the trend reverse again?

Jtarii•17m ago
Buying a house as an investment is so dumb.

Its only an investment if you are renting it out to someone else, otherwise you are just gambling.

bobson381•13m ago
Agree here. But I'm a doomer/collapsenik - so, the same future coming for "retirement" is the same future coming for "house always appreciates in value". Maybe 1990 -> 2020 was an okay 30 year period, 2026 -> 2056 sure won't be.
louthy•6m ago
> 2026 -> 2056 sure won't be.

You have evidence from the future?

spacebanana7•11m ago
In the UK at least there’s significant tax advantages to home ownership compared to renting.

Easily 30-50% of the money you pay in rent is immediately burned in tax/letting agent fees that don’t happen to a homeowner who “is their own landlord”. Additionally there’s no capital gains tax on one’s primary home.

Even if house prices stay flat it’s usually still better to own if rental yields in your area are higher than 5%.

jsw97•13m ago
Buying a house isn't just about expected return. It's also about hedging. You need to live somewhere, so you have an implicit liability of a stream of rental costs. The most natural hedge for that is a house. If expected future rental costs go up, your house value goes up. If they go down, your house value goes down. Overall, your risk, in present value terms, is reduced.

Of course this doesn't work exactly and you can nitpick this, but I think people should at least look at housing assets as more than "is it going to go up?", and more about long-term risk reduction. (And, just to be clear, this doesn't mean that you should lever up beyond reason to buy a house.)

bobson381•10m ago
Right. This would make it possible and reasonable if you could find a house that is enough, such that you can live in it, expect a reasonably good experience in it for the life of your time in it, and that that mortgage payment, plus all maintenance, insurance, tax, etc. is reasonably comparable to an equivalent rental. Depending on where you are, this is not always the case. Or you need to buy a small place at current rates and prices to make it at all comparable.

You have to decide what "enough" is, and that's variable depending on your expected standard of living, etc. I am personally currently lucky enough to be in a good rental situation, which colors my view.

Having a landlord that will fix problems and eat incidental appliance/roof/major expenses is a form of insurance paid as rental.

spacebanana7•9m ago
Exactly- owning one home is actually the neutral position. Renters are persistently taking a short position on real estate and landlords/multiple owners are effectively long.
quadragenarian•3m ago
Keep in mind though that by entering into a 20% down mortgage you are effectively levered up 5x against your local real estate market. So it’s not like you’re totally reducing your risk. Luckily for homeowners, home prices only go up since the GFC so this leverage seems like a good position to be in.
louthy•10m ago
> Number cannot always go up.

Yeah, I thought that when I was young too. The housing market can keep going up for much longer than you can hold out. Then, if there ever is a correction, it won't drop lower than this point right now.

My advice to any young'un thinking they can wait out the market: you can't, buy whatever you can afford as soon as you can and watch inflation reduce that painful monthly outgoing to something more manageable over time.

Housing isn't an investment opportunity. It's where you live.

alexpotato•9m ago
"The rule of thumb was:

- buy when home prices are 10x rent

- sell when home prices are 20x rent"

- The Big Short by Micheal Lewis [0]

I remember reading this quote and then checking NYC prices and it was a 33x multiple.

0 - https://amzn.to/4cr0tWX

cma256•8m ago
This is false. Can you cite a source for the idea that the 30-year mortgage was "founded" on the idea of appreciation? The thirty year mortgage was introduced to reduce the housing appreciation requirement the old balloon loan system relied on.
the_sleaze_•4m ago
I agree.

The mortgage was to allow people to eventually OWN THE PROPERTY, not a leveraged investment.

It's an interesting development that some (most?) regular people have forgotten that there is a 3rd option, not just rent or loan. You can actually OWN the thing and pay only property tax on it.

andsoitis•2m ago
> 30 year mortgage is founded partly on the idea that your house will be worth more in the future when you sell it.

Another meaningful reason is that it is a hedge against inflation. You pay a fixed amount for housing for 360 months, rather than having to adjust rental payments that will tend to go up over that time frame.