If so, this seems like hidden risk that AI users are probably not considering. Any code you write now carries information that you might not want revealed. If a bad actor gets the keys then they may be able to de-anonymous open source contributors who want to stay hidden. Or perhaps enough fingerprints across a sample could reveal internal organization details a company would rather not disclose.
Someone with more imagination can probably come up with better examples, it just seems like an attack vector that I haven't seen much consideration for.
[0] https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content
armchairhacker•35m ago
Otherwise, you're already vulnerable: Anthropic can silently record every change Claude makes to every codebase, maybe they already do.
nathanfig•24m ago
But injecting information into outputs is a little different than Claude keeping tabs internally. The point is that we do not know what information is being shipped with the fingerprint itself.