The success and growth of Mastodon proves that this model works, particularly for people who identify as being developers.
Is it possible to create mirrors of every repo with no Microsoft dependency or until someone else acquires GitHub from Microsoft and makes it more reliable (maybe Elon Musk like he did with Twitter)? This can solve for commit/push/pull when GitHub is down, but not for Pull requests and reviews.
GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49135365
Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
isoprophlex•17m ago
- githubs' ci/cd has been pretty crap for me personally (ok there's worse out there but it's definitely not a joyful thing)
- The user interface I hate more and more each year.
- The availability, well... there's still two nines in there lol
- the CLI is not bad, i don't hate that
IshKebab•13m ago
* Free CI, especially Mac & Windows.
Find my a competitor that offers that. Until then I think their uptime is going to have to get a lot worse before the majority care.
petcat•13m ago
180,000,000 monthly active users
the__alchemist•13m ago
Also, observe that the competitors all copied it's UI. And on a case-by-case basis, they have drawbacks of their own.
veqq•9m ago
Unfortunately, as a codeberg user, codeberg doesn't have 2 9s...
ehfeng•1m ago
plus, it's a huge headache to run and not very profitable. github mostly makes money on ci/cd, but a github alternative wouldn't benefit from that: anyone migrating would inherently evaluate other ci/cd vendors. plus, github eats a ton of network egress, which is very expensive. the only people who could eat the cost are the other clouds: gcp, aws, cloudflare, etc. but it feels dubiously beneficial for them.