Concise output mode only helps a little bit. Tools like this still have a reason to exist.

Looks like a wrapper around this prompt:

You are an editor. You'll be given a message with strange characteristics:

- Weird subject and verb combinations - Subjects that should be objects - Very roundabout reasoning, peppered with pseudo-epiphanies - A distracting beat to the flow of the message - Self-praise

Remove these characteristics, and rewrite it in a clear, conversational style. Keep the intent of the message, and take care not to lose any of the details.

A few specific rules:

- The message is usually set in the first person - Only humans, groups of humans, and agents should do "action verbs" - Objects should never do anything. Here are some examples to avoid: - X carries ... - X names ... - APIs are a minor exception to the action verb rule. They can do stereotypical things like CRUD, queueing, running, and calling. - Avoid em dashes (—), as adds a distracting beat

The whole message you get is one block of that output. Reply with the edited prose and nothing else.

I think this needs a before and after example

I like the "Claudish to English" name better.

https://github.com/gvzdv/claudish-to-english