frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Long Shadow of Checks (2023)

https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/the-long-shadow-of-checks/
1•mooreds•44s ago•0 comments

Learn Vectorized Thinking in Python Through Examples

https://machinelearningmastery.com/learn-vectorized-thinking-in-python-through-examples/
1•eigenBasis•55s ago•0 comments

The multiplying risks of financing data centres

https://www.ft.com/content/9cb63980-cd43-419d-a7e5-42039b9fd01e
1•petethomas•1m ago•0 comments

Enabling Images of Distant Worlds

https://www.mpg.de/26940719/photos-of-distant-exoplanets-taken-with-the-roman-space-telescope-and...
1•geox•2m ago•0 comments

Take a Tour of SLAC

https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/public-tours
1•mooreds•2m ago•0 comments

Taylor Farms: How One Company's Reach Became a National Risk

https://farmaction.us/taylorfarmsreport/
1•speckx•3m ago•0 comments

Using TouchID to login to SSH with sod

https://www.botanica.software/blog/ssh-logins-with-sod
2•botanica_labs•3m ago•0 comments

Apple's Quiet Shift to Rust: What It Means for Developers (2025)

https://goktugaral.medium.com/apples-quiet-shift-to-rust-what-it-means-for-developers-a4cca4a08abd
2•andsoitis•3m ago•0 comments

100M CROWPOWER and no horses on the moon

https://taylor.town/crowpower
1•surprisetalk•4m ago•0 comments

Language focused Docker images, minus the operating system. Topics

https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless
1•mooreds•4m ago•0 comments

Fixing Ill-Formed UTF-16 Strings with SIMD Instructions

https://twitter.com/lemire/status/2092615366199447677
1•tosh•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Shelf Protocol – Robots.txt for Commerce

https://github.com/Signal-All/shelfprotocol
1•Lui371•6m ago•0 comments

Charges Dropped Against Person Who Clapped at a City Data Center Meeting

https://www.404media.co/charges-dropped-against-person-who-clapped-at-a-city-data-center-meeting/
1•randycupertino•7m ago•0 comments

Companies Are Promising Cloud Seeding Can Make Rain

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/climate/cloud-seeding-west-drought-rain.html
1•lxm•8m ago•0 comments

To predict tree death, scientists tapped gamma rays to peer underground

https://www.science.org/content/article/predict-tree-death-scientists-tapped-gamma-rays-peer-unde...
1•Brajeshwar•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: How much of Hacker News is AI?

https://hnstats.com
3•beekthos•8m ago•1 comments

The Connections That Turned Precocious Teen into the Fallen 'Nostradamus of AI'

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/situational-awareness-leopold-aschenbrenner-ai-fund-4dbb00a4
1•pondsider•10m ago•0 comments

Intel Crescent Island GPU Flexes 32 Xe3P Cores, 480GB LPDDR5X for Agentic AI

https://hothardware.com/news/intel-crescent-island-hot-chips-2026
1•rbanffy•11m ago•0 comments

I Let AI Do the Easy Work. It Also Destroy Me at It

https://medium.com/freedomofthought/i-let-ai-do-the-easy-work-it-also-destroy-me-at-it-6530c51c3ff3
1•raynchad•11m ago•0 comments

Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

https://twitterwebviewer.com/
3•motownphilly•13m ago•1 comments

Websites send between 6 and 918 tokens of markup per token of content

https://hydrafetch.com/reports/token-index/
1•ghostfoxgod•14m ago•0 comments

Tell HN: GLM 5.3 "Flash" appears on DeepSWE with a score of 63%

https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/
1•theanonymousone•14m ago•0 comments

Project TUPPU: Students of the ancient Near East quickly discover that many OSs

https://www.bookandsword.com/resources/project-tuppu/
1•Bluestein•14m ago•0 comments

Throw Away the Key Encryption (TAKE) for Ring Cameras

https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/devices/ring-take-encryption
2•ssully•14m ago•1 comments

SSH Sshfighter.com

https://sshfighter.com?hn2
4•thomasfromcdnjs•15m ago•0 comments

GLM-5.3-Flash

https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3-flash
75•Philpax•15m ago•14 comments

Show HN: AgentMachinist, issue to reviewed PR with a SHA-bound spec approval

https://github.com/vscarpenter/AgentMachinist
1•vscarpenter•16m ago•0 comments

zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash

https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash
3•Philpax•17m ago•0 comments

Seneca: On Anger, Book I

https://stoacentral.com/library/on-anger-book-i
3•0xmattf•17m ago•0 comments

Microsoft Paint and Photos add invisible watermarks to AI-generated content

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/microsoft-paint-and-photos-app...
3•sbulaev•17m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta reaches $16.68B settlement over social media harms to children

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/meta-settles-with-us-states-over-social-media-harms-2026-08-26/
120•bhouston•56m ago

Comments

JumpCrisscross•45m ago
“Shares of Meta rose 4.4% in pre-market trading.”
scrumper•38m ago
A measure of the market's perception of the threat to Meta from these lawsuits. The uncertainty is over now, so the price goes back up.

I'm interested in the settlement details - yes $16bn ok fine but any behavioral or structural changes? If it's just financial, nothing really changes... (EDIT: I see julianpye found some details in the WSJ, in another comment. There are some feature adjustments.)

JumpCrisscross•29m ago
> the settlement details

“Meta will initially pay about $12 billion. That sum increases to $17.1 billion if Snap, TikTok and YouTube also settle with the states and agree to financial penalties and product changes.

…

The settlement will effectively force Meta to make major product changes for all U.S. users. The company agreed to interrupt endless scrolling and to impose two-hour daily time limits on Instagram and Facebook. To avoid addictive use and sleep interruptions, the company will limit usage between midnight and 6 a.m. and silence notifications between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

Meta will also limit features that psychologists link to negative social comparisons, such as beauty filters and a tallying of the ‘like’ button clicks. It will also strengthen age verification tools and parental controls” [1].

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/technology/meta-settlemen...

smugma•33m ago
Short-lived. Down to flat now.
julianpye•39m ago
The WSJ reports: "As part of the settlement agreement, Meta will also make sweeping changes to its services, Facebook and Instagram, including implementing a default two-hour time limit on its apps for users under 18."

The question is of course if these limits are enforced and if they are shared across other services.

kwanbix•35m ago
Two hours is one hour too long if you ask me.

This should be implemented also for adults.

And non-avoidable.

dmoose•26m ago
Two hours is two hours too long.
_ink_•34m ago
Probably default setting that can be changed by the under aged user. And probably per app or even per account.
pelagicAustral•34m ago
So nice of them to let kids lose their minds 2 hours at the time.
asf1254•39m ago
1% of their market cap. I don't think we'll see someone with a net worth of $100,000 paying only a $1000 fine for harming children.
iamacyborg•27m ago
If the handling of the Epstein files in the US is anything to go by, they’d get away scot free.
ben_w•19m ago
Market cap is generally the wrong measure. If you registered asf1254 Inc., and it was always just you, and it traded like Meta stocks trade, then "asf1254 Inc." would have a market cap ~6.2× whatever you're currently earning.

i.e., if you earn $100k/year, you'd be "worth" $620k, and 1% of that would be a fine of $6200.

dbbk•18m ago
Market cap isn't real money
micromacrofoot•5m ago
it's funny how it's real money when it's useful and fake money when it's not
kwanbix•38m ago
Only to children? What about adults? Yes, I know we are supposed to be more responsible, but this things are made to be addicted and you don't realize until it is too late.
_ink_•36m ago
Pay 25% from your 2025 profit for harming children since at least 2019 and be able to continue doing so. Sounds like a loss for society and a win for Meta.
oneneptune•31m ago
The article outlines several changes Meta is having to implement that curbs the "and be able to continue doing so" argument a bit. That said, I wish these settlements included tobacco-esque requirements for ongoing funds to educate people. The tobacco settlement funds have been somewhat successful.
aprilthird2021•30m ago
I dunno, I kinda feel they have to pay the price for governments not having applicable regulations on this kinda stuff.

It's not reasonable to expect them to put up rules their competition don't have to abide by, and if the government has 0 rules regarding social media, what should they do?

They're not solely responsible for phone addiction but none of their competitors get sued the same...

iso1631•12m ago
You can't use the word "reasonable" when dealing with companies with more power than most governments
alfalfasprout•29m ago
Yeah but politicians get to claim this is a win. Let's be honest, that's the real reason the prosecution went for a deal this small.
aprilthird2021
buellerbueller•36m ago
Shame; the states involved has an opportunity for actual redress of harms, as opposed to just some campaign-worthy soundbyte.
hugodan•30m ago
still feels like they got away easy for raping children's minds

"Meta has long argued it could not have misled consumers about whether its services were addictive because "social media addiction" is not a recognized psychiatric condition."

that's a nice escape hatch, considering that they are using all the tricks in the book (from online gambling, etc) and then some

aprilthird2021•28m ago
This is crazy, Meta is not solely responsible for people and kids having addiction to their phones (very similar if not identical to social media addiction).

Gambling has regulations all the companies have to abide by. Social media and content platforms have nothing like that.

forestrywat•26m ago
They are a very, very, very significant contributor.
Wolfbeta•22m ago
Who is paying for their internet access?
forestrywat•16m ago
Imagine being so out of touch that you think parents are generally equipped with the knowledge, features, and emotional capacity to manage their child's entire exposure to the internet in a way they cannot or will not circumvent. Laughable.
techpression•9m ago
4ndrewl•26m ago
Table stakes. Just the cost of doing business.

A bit like millionaires who park illegally because "it only cost $100 to park here, and my PA will do the admin"

jbombadil•23m ago
Would be nice to be able to enable these features as an adult (stop autoplay videos and no algorithmic feed).

Also, I’m surprised by the lack of enforcement to remove infinite scrolling.

paulkrush•13m ago
I want sliders to control the feed.
ChicagoBoy11•22m ago
As a school administrator, this is pretty disappointing.

I've included slides showing a graphic of someone in a slot machine next to a screenshot of Instagram, and would do an activity where the children themselves drew connections of what they saw/knew. It was not difficult, and they hit it out of the park every time.

The fact that the possible damages sought was over 200 billion, and this settlement clocks in at less than ten percent of that value plus "concessions" that really at this point are just tablestakes for them product itself to just be viable given the parent backlash against these things, is incredibly disappointing. They have cost people on the periphery of this A LOT more, and from a merely business proposition, the wanton disregard for safety in this case proved to be a smart business move. The lawsuit should have had a chilling effect on anyone trying to do anything similar lately, but that will not be the case.

fivetenpen•21m ago
Why not just ban the engagement algorithm completely. Adults are just as susceptible to addiction.
dbbk•19m ago
I absolutely hate these settlement endings. The states were going to win.
alpineman•17m ago
Shameful behavior. Anyone working on making these products more addictive or otherwise benefitting from their negative impact on society and politics should take a long hard look in the mirror.
paxys•17m ago
For context Meta had $61.8 billion revenue and $15.85 billion net income in Q2 2026. So this entire “existential threat” of teenage safety amounts to one bad quarter for the company, and they will continue on unscathed.
itsryanlenk•16m ago
As long as you have enough money to throw billion dollar darts at a trillion dollar dart board you're gonna skate out cleanly every time. There's a bigger problem here and everyone knows it.
gib444•16m ago
Pocket change
datakan•13m ago
Who gets the money?
stego-tech•12m ago
So a literal slap on the wrist that doesn’t discourage or stop the actually harmful behavior.

Look, I get that certain demographics are terrified of another Arthur Andersen-esque collapse of a firm, but if we don’t punish companies to the point of possible insolvency, then we’re creating a moral hazard wherein more companies will continue engaging in harmful behavior because they know they won’t ever be held properly accountable.

If we actually harmed (or even bankrupted) Meta with a suitable fine relative to the harms inflicted, you’d see the wider social media industry (and adjacent tech companies) clean up their shit really fucking fast to avoid a similar fate.

Ekaros•12m ago
Business as usual. The ownership class will always win. At this point I really doubt we will ever get anything that isn't either small payment relatively or something they can't weasel out of.
iso1631•11m ago
Isn't this just the EU wanting to tax big american businesses?
Ekaros•10m ago
Here it is states of USA wanting to tax corporation not incorporated in them. So pure greed.
jcmoscon•10m ago
I think worse than social media nowadays is youtube shorts. That thing is so addictive to kids. I wish there was a way to delete shorts from youtube and have only long form videos available in the app.
myko•2m ago
100%, Shorts are an abomination.
Devasta•8m ago
Anything that doesn't have Zuckerberg and the rest of the top brass in a gulag the rest of their lives doesn't go far enough.
hax0ron3•7m ago
So if I write a book that your kid just can't stop reading it over and over again because I deliberately made it compulsively re-readable, and then your kid develops some kind of issues because my book is so interesting to him, you can sue me and win?

I don't like that idea. Personally, I value free speech more than some supposed "harms" done to children by content. Content that they can easily stop consuming by just closing the app.

rlpb•4m ago
It's established that exposing children to bad things causes harm. This isn't specific to technology. "Free speech" isn't a concept that applies to the exposure of harmful speech to children.
65•2m ago
I agree, I should be allowed to give children my amazing crystal meth, it's such an untapped market.
skizm•6m ago
The other big tech companies were able to keep their settlement amounts private, since they settled before this case went to court. I wonder how their settlements compare. I bet they were much smaller given Meta took an actual L in court, they probably had less leverage when negotiating this number.
foolinaround•2m ago
who receives (or has received) actual payments ( other than the lawyers)? I think we need some service that is able to break this out
•
26m ago
Meta has the pocketbook to appeal this to a non-jury setup where they'd be more likely to win (imo most juries are ready to agree to any penalty on social media companies for any reason)
Noaidi•5m ago
And if people do not think Meta settled without input from the Trump administration and a possible reward for doing so, well, I got this bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, barely used.

I wonder which way Facebook's algorithms will tilt in this years mid-term elections....

nerder92•7m ago
> META Total Annual Revenue in 2025: $200.97 billion (up from $164.50 billion in 2024).

They literally don’t care.

Imagine thinking parents stand a snowballs chance in hell fighting against products explicitly made to exploit their children from companies spending billions on it. It’s like 0.00001% of parents that has those skills, if that.
kstrauser•25m ago
True. They’re just one of the largest companies who deliberately engineered their software to be addictive, the Sacklers of social media, if you will.
datsci_est_2015•18m ago
> Gambling has regulations all the companies have to abide by. Social media and content platforms have nothing like that.

Ah, then I’m sure Meta will be quite happy to support legislation that requires a message to be displayed every time you open the app, upload a photo, or post a comment:

  - “Social media use is shown to directly cause significant mental health distress, especially to children. Continue? Yes / Close / Configure allowed applications”
Similar to tobacco products.
Barbing•20m ago
>[irreparably damaging] children's minds

I’d love for someone to get me into Mark Zuckerberg’s head on why he should keep doing what he’s doing.

Jgrubb•17m ago
What's he gonna do? There is no "enough" with some personalities, there is only "more".
bakies•15m ago
Money!
Barbing•13m ago
Figure his own mental steelmans are legitimately more complex, though. And more faulty.
wyre•13m ago
If he doesn’t do it someone else will.

Also, I’m sure Peter Thiel being one of his first major investors has something to do with it.

api•14m ago
The smoking gun here is that they actually hired psychologists and experts in creating addictive stuff from e.g. the gambling industry. It clearly shows that their intent was "make this as addictive as possible."

Then they ignored tons and tons of warning signs that this was having a negative effect especially on children and the elderly.

65•4m ago
All those smart Stanford grads got to make the world a better place by psychologically damaging millions of children.
pwg•4m ago
> Then they ignored tons and tons of warning signs that this was having a negative effect especially on children and the elderly.

So long as the changes produced (to their belief) increases in advertising revenue, they didn't care. More ad money was all that mattered.

bgro•11m ago
Again and again crime, fraud, and terrorism is legal. There will never be justice and a $1 penalty is only a threat to the poor and a means to silence victims.

The only way they’ll learn is if for other means of justice to take care of the problem.

Fear is the only avenue left.

kderbyma•7m ago
If only the private mercs who act as "security" would realise it.....shame
picture•2m ago
What's to say they're ignorant?
mapotofu•6m ago
The system rewards psychopaths like Mark. Decent people, like Tom from MySpace, cash their check when they have more than they need. Demons, like Mark, want more and more and more and more- they will go to any lengths to get it because screw everyone else, they are lessers. That’s Mark and that’s the system rewarding him. We all know Tom is way cooler.
giwook•4m ago
Agreed, especially considering Meta made $60.46 billion in profit in 2025 alone.