The state needs to get involved to protect the unworkable system.
(though unconstrained capitalism is not ideal)
> unworkable system
? unconstrained pure capitalism has bad effects, but it is not unworkable unlike say pure communism applied at scale larger than a family
Anyway, wouldn't be a day ending in -y if this presidency wasn't yelling about "far-left terrorists".
Still, it seems like this would likely to be protected under the US first amendment, and it would probably be reasonable to bring legal action in the US to avoid silly stuff happening in Europe, when this in inevitably used to send goons and annoying infiltrators across the sea to Italy and Europe.
It's not end-to-end encrypted, and given how the Antifa networks are structured, it's very likely that they knew what was going on.
It's deserved and Antifas are the first ones to try to cancel/kill/hurt/intimidate who they judge are their enemies, so I won't shed a tear on those people.
ignoring the political leanings, this type of rhetoric will certainly be used to further the campaign against encryption, bolster the case for id verification requirements, etc. it paints the use of everyday normal tools: email, web hosting, etc. as inherently bad if they are private.
sybercecurity•36m ago