Why people are so compelled to gospel about their saviors to others? Why tech became a cult?

>A few years ago I’d never have added Google or StackOverflow as co-authors.

That's not as good of an argument as you think. If you copied entire functions or files wholesale, it would be fair to attribute that, even if you "reviewed" it.

I take responsibility when I am driving the AI. I wouldn't call my vehicle the "co-driver," even in cruise control (or these days, self-driving mode). Yes, it's doing a ton of work for me, but it is still just a tool.

I do think it's useful to log what model was used, but not as "co-author."

Exception: if a cloud agent designs and authors a commit autonomously, then it can be the "author," if only because I want it to be clear that my hands weren't on the wheel.

On the other, what they output is ultimately a (complicated) modification of the training data they’ve ingested, so people should made sure to attribute any code that’s been generated using an LLM trained on BSD sources appropriately.

1. 100% human 0% AI.

2. 100% AI, 0% human.

3. Everything in between.

1 and 2 are easy enough, but in 3 the human effort is not clearly legible or even measurable.

This is the way