frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Nvidia is the central bank of AI

https://www.economist.com/interactive/briefing/2026/09/03/nvidia-is-the-central-bank-of-ai
55•tolugenius•54m ago

Comments

tolugenius•54m ago
Archive: http://archive.today/kt50V
epsteingpt•44m ago
This is a good headline and point.

Realistically, they're worse than a central bank, because they can't exactly expand supply monotonically like a normal central bank. Nor do they realistically control rates.

amelius•27m ago
And what is TSMC in this analogy?
tccole•24m ago
Idk… government bonds or something?
creativeSlumber•21m ago
do they lend money to their customers to buy their own chips?
aeonik•21m ago
The currency press operator and manufacturer.
bigyikes•20m ago
What’s upstream of the central bank? …Congress?
itsalwaysgood•19m ago
A platform: aka the foundation under the bank.

The material cement that allows chips to exist above it.

And the platform is made of time: ours.

overcast•10m ago
ASML is the foundation. Without them, none of this would exist.
petcat•4m ago
I think we can go even further and say that IBM, Zeiss, several Japanese companies, and even the US Department of Energy are the actual foundation since ASML is largely just an integrator of many different technologies they license from elsewhere.
treebeard901•19m ago
The Japanese economy and yen carry trade is a close second.Rising oul prices and reduced output due to the conflicts in the Middle East could filter through to increasing yields on Japanese debt. In turn, the yen interventions have to continue to keep it lower than 160, which seems to be the psychological barrier for the yen carry trade.
yieldcrv•16m ago
I view the market as celestial objects influencing each other through a lattice similar to spacetime

Everything influences each other with varying gravitational pull

At one point the mental model was more like a web, but spacetime with mass matches the model more closely

Avicebron•8m ago
Money is a lot like mass, it has it's own gravity.
thrownawaysz•16m ago
I wonder when they will give up on the gaming market because that could take down several publishers and developers. I really don't think it's an if question but a when because it almost feels like an afterthought at this point (they removed the standalone gaming revenue report from the financial reports this summer). Also I don't think AMD and Intel is capable "to step in" to replace them.
CuriouslyC•11m ago
AAA gaming is cooked, and AMD/Intel is plenty able to support indie to AA needs.
12ha6•6m ago
Kushner and MBS bought Electronic Arts for $55 billion, so at least there will be a bailout or instructions to Nvidia to continue gaming cards.
Synthetic7346•3m ago
How so? I have a 5070ti but from what I've read the 9070xt keeps up well enough. As long as you don't need the cuda or dlss AMD is a good option
traverseda•9m ago
Eh, AMD makes a lot of video game console SoCs. If you look at the steam hardware survey most people are running ancient computers.
raincole•9m ago
They're advertising DLSS5 just now though.
u1hcw9nx•15m ago
If Nvidia is a bank, it's an Islamic Bank. They don't take interest (usury), they share profits and risk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_banking_and_finance

Imagine a scenario where the AI bubble bursts and AI companies and neoclouds go bankrupt en masse, and then a huge rebound occurs when AI has a delayed takeoff. Nvidia ends up with a massive amount of compute on its hands from its backstop deals, and it also owns assets from failed companies when profits start to grow. Hugging face takes the place of OpenAI and Anthropic when their assets are divided between survivors like Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta.

caaqil•5m ago
Of all the BS tech dudebro takes I read on a daily basis, I never guessed I would see this one on HN. It's so absurd it's not even wrong.
pwillia7•12m ago
Should there be a LIBOR for 1GB VRAM set each morning?
Havoc•2m ago
https://www.dramexchange.com/
anthonybourdain•11m ago
Okay, but at some point these investments need to start turning profits; the financing NVDA has arranged is temporary, and private credit needs returns at some point. The overinvestment in AI will lead to a downturn in the capital cycle.
Mistletoe•6m ago
How many top signals like this article do you need to see before you exit the market?

Let’s look to the past:

https://www.history.com/articles/1929-stock-market-crash-war...

thrownawaysz•1m ago
Which is distinctly different both in purpose and technology than the previous versions. DLSS 5 is no longer about frame improvements. It’s about increasing graphical fidelity with active AI rendering.

DLSS 5 is trying to relight and retexture the scene using AI. DLSS 4 is just trying to take a lower quality image and upscale it using AI

redox99•8m ago
They may allocate different number of resources every year based on market conditions but they'll never give up on gaming, that would be extremely silly.
bigyabai•7m ago
> I really don't think it's an if question but a when

Nvidia still will ship gaming products. The upcoming RTX Spark laptop APUs are still gaming-capable - we also have Blackwell gaming GPUs and the Nvidia-powered Nintendo Switch 2.

People echoed this sentiment during the crypto mining crunch, and we still got gaming hardware designs after that blew over. One of CUDA's core value props is the consumer market, and Nvidia probably won't surrender it unless hardware becomes unreasonably scarce.

Waterluvian•1m ago
Maybe this is silly of me, but maybe gaming would enjoy an era of hardware upgrades being rather unviable so the focus turns to optimization and aesthetic.