frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

GDScript: The Good, Bad, and Ugly Parts

https://azhdarchid.com/gdscript-good-bad-ugly/
1•birdculture•37s ago•0 comments

Fed Raises Rates as Warsh Bucks Trump to Contain Inflation

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-16/fed-raises-rates-as-warsh-bucks-trump-to-conta...
4•toomuchtodo•2m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Real-Time Chess Assistant (C++ DirectX, OpenCV, ImGui and Stockfish)

https://github.com/rccmb/oracle
1•baptistarodrigo•2m ago•1 comments

How to Train a Frontier-Level World Model

https://next-state.github.io/open-dreamer/
1•Sacco215•3m ago•0 comments

The Oddity of Your Sneezes

https://bodilyoddities.com/blog/the-oddity-of-your-sneezes/
1•vesterde•5m ago•1 comments

Statement On V/H/S SCP Foundation Film

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/statement-on-vhs-film
2•andybak•7m ago•0 comments

First Round Capital Sales Program – Free

https://www.firstround.com/sales-combine
1•lockeluhnow•8m ago•1 comments

Show HN: TabMail. Open-source AI email for Thunderbird and iPhone

https://tabmail.ai/
1•kmyi•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a router for agent tools

https://github.com/monid-ai/monid
2•Exquisitian•9m ago•1 comments

AI Safety Needs a State

https://atomstointelligence.substack.com/p/ai-safety-needs-a-state
1•abhinavsns•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pkgbot – Fast Linux package search engine

https://pkg.bot
1•knadh•11m ago•0 comments

ArXivMath and BrokenArXiv: Harder Problems and Revised Grading

https://matharena.ai/arxiv_august/
3•bluepeter•13m ago•0 comments

Every Agent Session Is a Test Run

https://mielony.com/blog/self-improvement-by-cron/
2•tkwiatek•14m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Navier-Stokes Proof Meets a New Kind of Database

https://8braid.com/journal/openai-navier-stokes-proof-meets-a-new-kind-of-database
4•ashdee•17m ago•0 comments

Can agents price a PR's impact?

https://weaveos.com/blog/can-agents-price-a-prs-impact-or-utility
3•adeland•17m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Google has suspended our business profile

4•joewithawhy•17m ago•1 comments

Maintainer rejected AI contributions, we forked it and added video acceleration

https://twitter.com/SiliconForested/status/2100247223368024109
6•mococa•18m ago•0 comments

4chan/Kiwifarms lawsuit against OFCOM dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

https://prestonbyrne.com/2026/09/15/4chan_ofcom_mtd/
4•majorchord•18m ago•1 comments

Advertising is coming to AI chatbots and it could influence the answers you get

https://theconversation.com/advertising-is-coming-to-ai-chatbots-and-it-could-influence-the-answe...
2•rdmuser•20m ago•0 comments

The Neurobiology of Digital Addiction

https://zake.app/articles/neurobiology-digital-addiction-dopamine-cortical-thinning-brain-recalib...
2•Vishal_Max•20m ago•0 comments

Lawsuit accuses AI security company of publishing hallucinated findings

https://www.theregister.com/legal/2026/07/02/startup-sues-palo-alto-networks-koi-security-saying-...
2•onesandofgrain•21m ago•0 comments

Freeriding and Rebellion: An Investigation of Open Source Vendor Relicensing

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/isj.70060
3•Tomte•21m ago•0 comments

Build a company/domain-specific harness with OSS Python framework

https://cayu.dev/
1•zamir_akimbekov•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Zill

2•yhussain1110•25m ago•0 comments

Hook and Squeeze

https://data4democracy.substack.com/p/hook-and-squeeze
1•ravenical•27m ago•0 comments

Anthropic to fold Claude AI features into one interface, launches document tools

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/anthropic-fold-claude-ai-features-into-one-interfa...
2•tartoran•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: An ObjC-like compiler for Mac ARM, x86_64(Linux, Win), WASM, & others

1•spacedcowboy•30m ago•0 comments

Debian 13 for Synology DS115j

https://github.com/manowark/ds115j
1•CTOSian•30m ago•0 comments

Where's My Alien Mind?

3•throwaway63467•30m ago•0 comments

The Search for Markdown Viewer Is Over

https://www.blogetcetera.com/2026/the-search-for-markdown-viewer-is-over/
1•RivoLink•30m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: AI Panic, you buying it?

8•elai-intelligen•1h ago
In your opinion, do you buy into the panic about AI eliminating humanity or potentially disrupting and taking down the internet? Is this a marketing ploy?

Give me your best thoughts on this most recent call for AI slowdown.

Comments

blinkbat•56m ago
at this moment? no. one day, perhaps soon? yes
blinkbat•55m ago
also, taking down the internet for a couple days doesn't sound so bad. we could all hang out again.
setnone•19m ago
i wish internet had a day off on sunday
elai-intelligen•12m ago
Can't lie, I'd be all for the internet dropping for a few days... Except no Amazon purchases lol
JohnFen•55m ago
No, I don't buy into that at all.

I think that the genAI companies themselves present a greater danger to us (arguably not an existential danger, though) than genAI itself.

trio8453•7m ago
What's the difference?
deepsquirrelnet•40m ago
No. Frontier AI companies need the government to shield them from becoming commodity. That's why they're begging for regulation.

On the other side, the current administration also has powerful backers whose businesses are complemented by AI and would benefit from it becoming a commodity. Think about who Vance is speaking on behalf of.

So the AI companies need to use fear to drive public demand for their regulation efforts. IMO there's little to no honest discourse and a lot of attempts to manipulate public opinion for objectives that we have little stake in. I personally don't trust any of the involved parties to make decisions for the public good.

taurath•25m ago
They’re not giving any details about why or how.

If they were the moral people they say they are, and believed what they say about it killing humanity they would stop unilaterally. These are the “rationalists” but they act like the fundamentalist church I grew up in. Every fact serves the same conclusion.

setnone•13m ago
if AGI will come in versions i think we are safe
herbst•13m ago
From my perspective it looks like working to deep in AI makes you crazy. No other way to explain all the weird bullshit these billionaires throw around.

Sure AI sucks, but not to that degree (yet)

trio8453•8m ago
I'm not panicking but there are very real risks.

If you haven't looked at the stuff that has come out in the past couple of months (like the Huggingface hack and the Navier-Stokes solution) and/or you're dismissing it as marketing, you're grossly misunderstanding the current state of what's possible, what the potential of the frontier models deployed at scale is. Personally I'm finding it fascinating to follow, and I'm much more excited about the upsides than thinking about the risks but the risks are very real.

Aditya_0315•7m ago
If you look around I don't think we're at the point where even if AI go rogue it could just disrupt us for a while. No real major concern to humanity but yeah I guess having rules and regulations would be plus point. So for now there shouldn't be anything to panic about.
bcorigliano•2m ago
Agree. Ais gone rogue now could be bad, but not humanity-ending bad. Just a hiccup. Of course if it somehow ends with human deaths then even if one human dies because of a rogue AI, that's a failure. But I can't imagine rogue AIs with enough real world power to harm humans in some way. What I do believe however is that humans will find a way to do harm with AI without AI going rogue, as with any other thing humanity comes close to. So the scenario is somehow similar to the nuclear bomb in the 40s, I don't fear our AIs going rogue and killing everyone, I fear a bad guy behind a very smart AI with very bad intentions.
mindcrime•7m ago
I don't consider this a "yes/no" question. It seems quite clear to me that the idea of "AI doom" is neither certain (100% probable) nor impossible (0% probable). The question is where on the continuum is the truth. And I don't know. And I'm pretty sure nobody else does either.

That said, there are plausible scenarios where AI can cause great harm, even if it doesn't extend to "eliminating all humanity". So I don't reject calls for putting more emphasis on AI safety and alignment out of hand. On the other hand, I don't support the idea of implementing a new "Turing Registry"[1] like government agency. I also don't think most of the various proposals out there for regulating AI are enforceable in the slightest.

So where does that leave me? Uncertain. I wish I could take a more concrete stance, but from my perspective, the data needed to do that just isn't there.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromancer