Isn't this basically what Anthropic wanted?
It boils down to inexperience with a healthy dose of delusion on Anthropic's part.
Ah: withdrawing from a college course.
that's the mobster-loyalty mentality, and it's not how successful (read: desirable for the most people) governments function
So yes obviously defense contractors are forbidden to use it.
iamdelirium•27m ago
If I was Palantir or any other GOP aligned company, I would be completely against this. What's to stop a Democratic president from doing the same thing and destroying them?
mattnewton•24m ago
bpodgursky•22m ago
2OEH8eoCRo0•5m ago
cramer4next•22m ago
Ydarbleoj•14m ago
samudrijan•3m ago
Dems still subsidize O&G but they have other constituents they need to pay lip service to.
Banking and finance own both parties.
chrisjj•19m ago
_ink_•17m ago
doctorwho42•16m ago
I doubt that is going to change anytime soon. They are a private entity, so they can manage and change their primary system any way they want.
ajross•3m ago
Sarbanes-Oxley? Dodd-Frank? ACA? Now I'm sure you (like, every other living human) has a ton of nitpicks and criticism of bills like that. But they're real and they passed and they're largely-to-wholely partisan creations of the Democratic policy apparatus (SOX looked very bipartisan and was passed under Bush, but the actual bill was written mostly by democratic staffers).
I mean, fine, you'd like different regulation. But they're responsible for basically all the corporate regulation active in the US regime.
Bothsidesism is a very poor tool for this particular argument. Work with your allies, please.