frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Google breaks promise to provide 10 years of updates to Chromebooks

https://www.osnews.com/story/146052/google-breaks-promise-to-provide-10-years-of-updates-to-chromebooks/
100•speckx•1h ago

Comments

gib444•1h ago
Recently https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893653
jqpabc123•1h ago
Since when has Google ever been trustworthy?

This is just standard operating procedure. Remember --- "Don't be Evil".

zoobab•1h ago
The solution: legislate.
BLKNSLVR•15m ago
Exactly.

It's getting to be that nothing can be trusted. Even legislation, if it's not enforced.

mbeavitt•1h ago
For anyone currently owning a Chromebook and worrying about this:

https://docs.mrchromebox.tech

theodric•49m ago
FWIW, my C13 Yoga (Morphius) runs full-fat Linux significantly better than it ever ran ChromeOS
easyThrowaway•1h ago
Are the people who made the promise even still at Google?

It reminds me of those sketchy companies on Amazon promising "lifetime guarantee" on their products when they know already they're gonna close shop and reopen on a completely different brand the very next year.

Kinrany•31m ago
If those people made the promise on behalf of Google while working there and being in a position to make such promises, it's Google's problem now.

(If they _weren't_ in said position, it's still Google's problem but with some caveats provided Google actually treats it as abuse of authority.)

AdmiralAsshat•56m ago
Google: What are you gonna do? Sue us?
rkozik1989•52m ago
You can take mega corporations to small claims court and you're often not worth their time so they'll just settle.
dathinab•41m ago
if you are a school or similar which ordered a large stack of them in the last two years then yes, especially if multiple such organizations join together on a legal case.

In the end "help with migration to" isn't the same supporting the existing product.

And if you advertised a product with 10 year support that _is_ legally binding (in the EU) and a clear cut case of you losing around 10-20% of the advertised value.

Given that legal costs might be to some degree covered by legal insurance and it being a clean cut case this is likely worth the money. But also a case where google can "just settle and not care" as in many cases schools did more things like forcing parents to buy chrome books then buying them themself, so it's unlikely to amass any relevant damage amount for Google.

More funny would be if the judge rules "10 years promised? You are cable of delivering 10 years?! You have to deliver it! And for all chrome books bought [8;10[ years before the deadline not just the suing party".

pjmlp•36m ago
Thing is, not every country in the world is trigger happy with lawsuits like in US, so there is a very high chance it goes nowhere, depending on the jurisdiction.

Likewise many legal insurances have footnotes regarding how far they are actually going to support you in a claim process.

sokoloff•
motionlessveloc•55m ago
The actual update:

> ChromeOS devices will continue to receive regular updates and security patches through mid-2034. For qualifying devices purchased today whose 10-year support lifecycle extends beyond 2034, Google is committed to supporting your transition to Googlebook OS, with many devices offering direct migration paths.

In other words, support will be offered until 2034. if you're buying a new Chromebook today and intend to keep it for longer than 8 years, you're doing so at your own risk.

salviati•52m ago
Directly after the passage you quote:

> Google promised 10 years of updates for all Chromebooks, and it’s now breaking that promise for anyone buying a Chromebook between now and whenever the last Chromebook rolls off the production line

So, they're changing the promise from now on, and not breaking it for past users. Doesn't sound like they're breaking their promise to me.

Kwpolska•16m ago
They are breaking the promise for people who bought a Chromebook between 2024 and 2026.
silon42•55m ago
The only reason I'd consider buying a Chromebook is to install Linux on it... Same is true for Googlebook.
pphysch•54m ago
So it's as low as 8 years instead of 10 for models purchased in the last 2 years (2034 being the cutoff), with those few devices being covered by a separate commitment to transfer them to GoogleOS by 2034.

Pretty lame detail to be enraged about, but it is Google and this is HN. This aligns with Apple's timeline for killing Intel MacBook support after releasing Apple Silicon (2029 being the last commitment).

wat10000•34m ago
Buying something that promises 10 years of updates and then having them turn around and say "lol just kidding you get 8" is pretty enraging.

Lining up with Apple is meaningless. Apple didn't promise updates for a longer period and then pull back.

jezzamon•54m ago
Discussed a lot here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49893653

Seems to be more reasonable than this title suggests?

Some comments: "So they have introduced a major change and said any older Chromebooks bought going forward will only get 8. So its not a retrospective reduction for existing customers." (Edit: actually I think this comment is wrong, if you bought a Chromebook 1 year ago, you'd only get 9 years of ChromeOS updates)

"From my understanding of the article, it sounds like ChromeOS support is getting pared back for those devices, but the devices themselves should still be supported, albeit via a (planned but not yet in existence) migration path to GooglebookOS."

hedora•42m ago
These devices are usually bought on contract, with lots of lock in.

In particular, there are lots of schools getting screwed over financially. Maybe they’ll switch vendors, or use the money for education. Chromebook spending has a strong negative correlation with educational performance.

As a parent, I am supposed to have control over my kids’ personal information, but the schools firehose all the most sensitive kids’ info they have to an unlawful marketing firm that I do not trust. How do I opt out?

wat10000•39m ago
Surely those contracts specify whatever the schools need.
hdgvhicv•28m ago
> How do I opt out?

Through your government. Maybe you could form a union strong enough but unlikely as you face more to lose than them.

static_motion•50m ago
Is anyone surprised at this? Abandoning products in an untimely fashion is their specialty. I've never bought a hardware product from them for that reason, except for a 2nd gen Chromecast which was something whose longevity I didn't care too much about.
hbn•39m ago
My pet theory with this move from Chromebooks to Googlebooks is simply that Chromebooks have a major stink on their entire brand reputation, especially in the younger generation that went through school with terrible cheap (and likely used/damaged) Chromebooks being given to them for schoolwork.

I think if you say "Chromebook" around most 20-something and unders, they have an instant negative association with the word.

ocd•7m ago
I guess it's true this could be their AOL disc.
orbital-decay•37m ago
>Stuff like this should not be legal.

Alternatively, if users want legally binding contracts they should not treat promises as such.

soulofmischief•28m ago
I can't be the only one who thinks Googlebook is the least appealing name I may have ever heard for a hardware product.
threethirtytwo•26m ago
Stuff like this should not be legal?

Isn’t it illegal? It’s actual false advertising. You can sue them, it’s just no one has.

shevy-java•16m ago
Good thing I did not trust Google 10 years ago either.

What we see here is a strategic shift by Google; you need to connect this here, with the prior Google strategy of no longer open sourcing Android-related stuff or with a huge delay. This is not an isolated thing - Google is planning Evil again, as usual.

mococa•12m ago
Not sure why people still trust on big corps...
fouc•8m ago
[delayed]
23m ago
> In the end "help with migration to" isn't the same supporting the existing product.

I don't know that that's clearly true. Apple gives at least 5 to 7 years of updates past the last sale date for computers. (I don't know if this is an explicit promise or not; they have an explicit hardware support for 5 years and limited support for vintage [5-7 years old] equipment.)

I don't think I get to demand 5 years of support for specifically Sonoma or Tahoe on that equipment, but rather just N years of "some usable version of an OS and support to transition to it".

Replacing ChromeOS with GooglebookOS 8 years from now seems not that different from replacing Tahoe with Golden Gate.

The other alternative could be "we still support ChromeOS for 10 years, and will release security patches for all critical vulnerabilities that we find and fix after 2034" (but we might privately not look that hard for them...)

eitally
•
25m ago
Education contracts do not allow Google to use customer data for advertising.
shevy-java•15m ago
But they still store the data.
_blk•11m ago
Homeschool, vote for free school choice, vote for getting the subsidized funds to where you actually send your kids. Solves most problems related to bad school policies.
robertlagrant•4m ago
> or use the money for education

Totally agree. Would love far fewer computers in schools.

wat10000•36m ago
Isn't it retrospective to all customers who purchased in the last 2 years? They're not saying a Chromebook bought yesterday gets 10 years but one bought tomorrow only gets 8. They're saying they all end in 2034. If you bought one yesterday expecting 10 years of updates, you got screwed.
bryanlarsen•34m ago
They're saying that you'll have to switch from ChromeOS to GoogleOS to keep getting updates for the full 10 years.
wat10000•31m ago
"All Chromebook platforms will get regular automatic updates for 10 years"

Are they going to make the switch automatic? It sure doesn't sound like the sort of transition that can be done automatically.

jezzamon•17m ago
Yeah I think you're right.
shevy-java•16m ago
Could you clarify what you mean with reasonable here?

Show HN: Solarite – web components with no compilation and minimal DOM updates

https://eric-frost.github.io/solarite/
1•EricFrost•2m ago•0 comments

Kill the code review theater, keep the review

https://thenewstack.io/kill-code-review-theater/
1•tonkkatonka•2m ago•0 comments

Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of violence

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/cannabis-use-is-associated...
2•bookofjoe•3m ago•0 comments

Electrification Special Report 2026 [pdf]

https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/1c696cc3-e251-46a9-8d4d-9edb2a4e806a/Electrification.pdf
2•gmays•4m ago•0 comments

Beware of the Meeting Minutes

https://daily.jstor.org/beware-of-the-meeting-minutes/
1•wawayanda•4m ago•0 comments

OKI Develops 124-Layer PCB Technology

https://www.oki.com/global/press/2025/z25006e.html
1•luu•5m ago•0 comments

AI coding agents leaked 13,000 screenshots, and nobody hacked them

https://thenewstack.io/coding-agents-leaked-screenshots/
1•Brajeshwar•5m ago•0 comments

Open-ended data is a bottleneck for AI systems tackling real knowledge work

https://www.fig.inc/blog/open-ended-data-is-a-bottleneck/
2•joehabeebs•5m ago•0 comments

United States Postal Service Creed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Service_creed
1•helsinkiandrew•6m ago•0 comments

AI agents inadvertently leak 13,000 internal screenshots from 300 organizations

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/ai-agents-inadvertently-leak-13-000-int...
2•rbanffy•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Helo – An email API from former Postmark folks

https://www.helohq.com
2•Archanian•7m ago•0 comments

Turbo Haskell

https://comonad.com/reader/2026/turbo-haskell/
1•pjmlp•7m ago•0 comments

Reddit will shut off RSS feeds on November 13

https://www.theverge.com/tech/1002788/old-reddit-ai-scraping
3•clircle•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: DAW with Modular Synth, running in a browser using stock WebAudio nodes

https://seven.systems/xequence2/demo/demo-deploy/www/index.html
1•intrr•9m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is vibe coding bad for SaaS projects?

3•gsngsn•9m ago•1 comments

US-based Doxx raises $38M to create no log VPN

https://refreshmiami.com/news/doxx-net-raises-38m-to-put-ai-agents-on-a-shorter-leash/
4•TheWeiHu•9m ago•3 comments

Canary Islands live – Large, cool LLM-summarized news feed

http://canano.live/
1•rdn86•12m ago•0 comments

Site: *.si "Domain for Sale"

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3A*.si+%22Domain+for+sale%22
4•novateg•13m ago•0 comments

Positron – Purpose-built hardware for the age of generative AI

https://www.positron.ai
2•peter_d_sherman•17m ago•0 comments

NFL standings if every game were replayed 4k times

https://luckadjusted.com/nfl
3•cppcrunch•18m ago•1 comments

CTE Can't Be Detected in the Living. New Brain Research Offers Hope.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/22/science/cte-diagnosis-brain-injury.html
2•bookofjoe•18m ago•1 comments

Show HN: SundaeDB – Multimodal Analytics for Agents

https://sundaedb.com/
2•itrummer•19m ago•0 comments

Sriti Core – Local-first LLM router that cascades Ollama to cloud to frontier

https://github.com/sriti-ai/sriti-core
2•sudevs•19m ago•0 comments

SteamOS Ported to ARM Handhelds

https://www.notebookcheck.net/SteamOS-wasn-t-supposed-to-run-on-Snapdragon-based-Android-handheld...
3•wicket•20m ago•0 comments

Stop Recomputing Context: Introducing ContextCube

https://www.turingdata.io/blog/stop-recomputing-context-introducing-contextcube
2•simonpure•20m ago•0 comments

AI Agents Targeted U.S. and Canadian Government Websites

https://transluce.org/us-canada-gov
2•geox•21m ago•0 comments

Eutetic: The First Autonomous Data Scientist

https://eutetic.com
2•FrancescoMassa•21m ago•1 comments

40 years of writing code. I didn't see the end coming

3•temilson•23m ago•5 comments

EU's Microsoft Teams alternative draws bad reviews from officials

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-microsoft-teams-alternative-bad-reviews-element-pro/
2•Scharkenberg•23m ago•1 comments

SK Hynix denies confirmed US memory plans with Intel

https://news.skhynix.com/en/fact-10/
3•wslh•23m ago•0 comments