This sounds like it can be a really good thing. In an ideal world it’s a perfect use of LLMs. It helps make the ballot more approachable to people, and it can encourage more people to vote or help people vote less blindly.
At the same time, it also relies on these tools being unbiased adjudicators. And over time I think there’s a greater risk of this straying from the truth.
yawpitch•29m ago
Yet.
andsoitis•1m ago
To be objective, you should test across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok, to see how fair they each are.