Okay

> I'll tolerate the usage of software that received AI contributions. I myself paint and create daily on a Linux operating system, a project that accepted AI code contributions.

“Artists gotta eat but not programmers”. Commoditize your complements at the societal level.

Good luck with that...

>> "The Creative Commons licenses I used since more than a decade (CC By for Pepper&Carrot, and CC By-Sa for MiniFantasyTheater) miss an option: the possibility to prohibit AI generated derivation."

Did they miss it, or did you misunderstand what "commons" means? AI complicates the goal a bit, but no, I don't think they missed anything. Here's what CC had to say on the topic so far: https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/

>> "AI is built on the commons. To serve the public interest, AI must help grow, not diminish, the commons, ensuring benefits are widely shared. We need a new social contract, anchored in reciprocity and a shared commitment to the commons."

Which is a great idea. Putting up more barriers doesn't seem compatible with that. All you've done is pre-emptively cordon off your work from the commons based on the tools people use.

Unfortunately this is as effective as going outside and declaring it to the sky.