frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Salvation of Susan Pevensie

https://dougwils.com/books-and-culture/the-salvation-of-susan-pevensie.html
1•barry-cotter•1m ago•0 comments

Getting a subroutine right: a case study [pdf]

https://cr.yp.to/talks/2026.10.15/slides-djb-20261015-sorting-4x3.pdf
1•matt_d•3m ago•0 comments

Redis now has compressed bitmaps (Roaring)

https://lemire.me/blog/2026/10/15/redis-now-has-compressed-bitmaps-roaring/
1•smilelamp•3m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT can peek at your Chrome tabs now

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/1012510/openai-chatgpt-google-chrome-tabs
1•mikelgan•4m ago•0 comments

Hackers hijack D-Link, Ubiquiti devices to resell your stolen bandwidth

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-hijack-d-link-ubiquiti-devices-to-resell-y...
1•wondersky•5m ago•0 comments

AA-Robotics v0.1

https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/aa-robotics
2•liamswayne•6m ago•0 comments

My journey with AI induced mania in embedded computer graphics engineering [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig2gYmOTuug
1•i2pi•8m ago•1 comments

68k Macintosh Ports

https://roytinker.com/68k-ports/
1•TimTheTinker•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Luksmith – Mount LUKS Ext4 Drives Natively in Finder on Apple Silicon

https://luksmith.app
2•baytizzel•12m ago•0 comments

Netflix Layoffs and A16Z layoffs are they signs for something?

2•dzonga•13m ago•0 comments

SK Hynix Unveils Next-Generation Memory Roadmap to Address AI Bottlenecks

https://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=158124
2•peter_d_sherman•13m ago•0 comments

Linus Torvalds is using AI to develop Linux kernel code now

https://www.zdnet.com/innovation/linus-torvalds-uses-ai-to-write-linux-kernel-patch/
3•RickJWagner•16m ago•1 comments

Why your health insurance is dropping GLP-1 coverage

https://www.vox.com/good-medicine-newsletter/506555/glp-1-wegovy-zepbound-cost-health-insurance
2•ggm•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AlwaysGreen – uptime monitoring and status page

https://alwaysgreen.tech/
1•mikewww•21m ago•0 comments

Agent personas > agent objectives: case study with multiagent benchmark tool

https://jonathanwmaddison.github.io/loombench/
1•maddmann•22m ago•0 comments

PlayerPro: Open-source Mac OS 9 music tracker ported to the web

https://www.empireofslop.com/playerpro/
1•swivelmaster•22m ago•0 comments

Palm OS Developer Archive

https://github.com/ardiri/dev-palmos
1•sohkamyung•22m ago•0 comments

What It Took

https://bahaaldine.com/articles/eleven-years-in-a-calendar/
1•bahaazarmi•25m ago•0 comments

October 15, 2026: The world has decided to get rid of leap seconds

https://www.timeanddate.com/news/astronomy/no-more-leap-seconds-utc-2026
2•chungus•28m ago•0 comments

The Sun Never Sets on the Ant Empire

https://sqonline.ucsd.edu/2019/05/the-sun-never-sets-on-the-ant-empire/
3•dkgs•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: TRON-069 – mapping the Internet's last-mile management infrastructure

https://scadastrangelove.github.io/TRON-069/
2•scadaSL•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: eqMini – Open-source macOS equalizer with per-app controls

https://github.com/elmsec/eqmini
1•elmsec•29m ago•0 comments

Forgejo v17.0 Is Available

https://forgejo.org/2026-10-release-v17-0/
2•wondersky•32m ago•0 comments

Putin Admits Moscow Failed to Anticipate Ukrainian Strikes on E-Commerce Hubs

https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/putin-admits-moscow-failed-to-anticipate-ukrainian-strik...
1•nsdfg•34m ago•0 comments

Remote Attestation Should Not Be Tolerated

https://lumi.codeberg.page/blog/remote-attestation.html
4•birdculture•35m ago•3 comments

We're not ready for superpersistent AI

https://www.natesilver.net/p/were-not-ready-for-superpersistent
1•gwintrob•35m ago•0 comments

Russia Wants FSB Encryption Built into Every 5G Smartphone

https://united24media.com/world/russia-wants-fsb-encryption-built-into-every-5g-smartphone-from-i...
3•nsdfg•36m ago•0 comments

Git include: a Git-subrepo-compatible plugin for nested and vendored repos

https://github.com/Flova/git-include
1•flova•39m ago•1 comments

Will AI soon lead to double-digit growth?

https://aleximas.substack.com/p/will-ai-soon-lead-to-double-digit
2•gwintrob•40m ago•0 comments

Crypto Policy Faces New Conflict-of-Interest Questions

https://discord.com/channels/1519570089488289956/1522069205795606650/1560120881668161636
1•joeymabia1•40m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Call Center Jobs Are Declining, but 14,000 Calls Show Humans Still Outperform AI

https://boldagents.co/blog/call-center-jobs-declining-14000-calls-humans-outperform-ai
33•thomas_unise•40m ago

Comments

toomuchtodo•38m ago
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1609/id/1418187

- California’s AB 1609 requires large businesses to connect customers with human agents within 15 minutes.

- Businesses exceeding $500 million in revenue must display wait times and disclose chatbot interactions.

- Violations carry civil penalties starting at $5,000, making human access a legal obligation.

redox99•37m ago
Having to waste 15 minutes with an AI is still crazy though.
gjsman-1000•34m ago
Nah, if it becomes law, we’ll get apps which just call a number for you and run out the clock.
toomuchtodo•33m ago
I believe Google and Apple phones support this today. “Hold assist” and “Hold for Me.”

https://support.apple.com/en-us/127521

https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/10071878?hl=en

odo1242•31m ago
Hold Assist doesn’t work if there’s any speech (like an AI agent) on the line, it specifically only works when on hold.
toomuchtodo•31m ago
Easily updated existing feature, code path, and user experience is the point. Just has to be good enough to iterate on.
jcastro•32m ago
> must display wait times

"We're sorry, we're receiving more calls than usual, stand by..."

24/7 for over 30 years!

toomuchtodo•31m ago
Configure agents for consumers at scale to report violations to regulators. Wait time not accurate or communicated? Complaint filed. Human agent not available within time limit? Complaint filed.

Think about all the time and effort for all of the consumers in the aggregate that would be needed to hold corporate counter parties accountable, with the cost being code and some compute time on device. This is where AI agents shine. They can do the mundane work of capturing evidence of compliance violations, packing the violation event, and reporting them.

Every consumer’s phone becomes a regulator watchdog node. We can even use LLMs to rapidly ship the app(s) needed to do this.

seattle_spring•11m ago
The provider for Chase credit card claims (insurance, price match, etc.) went through a company, EClaimsLine, that had nearly that exact phrase bold and red on their website for many, many years. I'm honestly shocked that their new website after the rebrand to Chase Card Services doesn't say it too.
dmitrygr•14m ago
> AB1609

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2016-11-30

dataflow•4m ago
[delayed]
add-sub-mul-div•32m ago
The AI era isn't about what performs best. It's about what can be delivered most cheaply and isn't a liability because your competition will be doing the same thing.
symfoniq•31m ago
AI “customer service” is so incredibly bad. I’ve not had a single interaction that an AI agent could solve. It’s just a huge waste of my time and an increase in aggravation.
LPisGood•29m ago
My assumption is that it is there to make the process less convenient so people only use it if they really need to.
10xDev•27m ago
If it is an LLM, it has been prompted to say almost nothing except prewritten responses to avoid legal issues or to avoid free LLM usage. I think it was Chipotle support that would write code if you asked it.
onlyrealcuzzo•26m ago
AT&T & Comcast figured out how to have incredibly bad automated service quite a while before LLMs.
augment_me•22m ago
It's a really good way to offload costs to the customer. You make the process so full of friction that the customer feels like it's not worth the process to make the return. Works the best with big monopolies
seattle_spring•15m ago
I'm 100% convinced that this is the reason so many customer service jobs are being shelved.

No one who actually wants to provide a good experience for their customers would offshore, nor would they offload this to AI agents. They know that customers have very limited opportunities nowadays, so the company responses seem to be along the lines of, "fine, go somewhere else! Oh, there's nowhere else to go? I guess you'll be staying with us afterall muahaha!"

10xDev•30m ago
"AI"

Usually when I chat with a support bot it doesn't feel like an LLM but something that performs keyword matching and a prewritten response pre-LLM era.

gdulli•27m ago
I hate it either way, because my typical issue is something bespoke that needs a human to resolve. Or else I wouldn't be reaching out.
dmd•21m ago
HN readers - and even more so HN commentators - are not typical though. Literally 99% of people interacting really are asking a question answered by the FAQ, just like 99% of people calling the customer service number for their credit card want to pay their bill or find out their balance.
dmitrygr•15m ago
So then offer the shibboleet option! https://xkcd.com/806/
arjie•10m ago
Doesn’t work anymore. Our apartment building has a few providers and people were trying to report an outage with ASNs specified and suggesting they check BGP advertisements and so on. It turns out our Google Fiber microwave dishes were misaligned.

But all shibboleths are obsolete now.

mym1990•24m ago
I don't know how much more cost effective AI bots are for customer service over offshore call centers currently, but I would guess that the industry sees the AI tooling getting much better over the next X years, while call center agents are going to be relatively level in terms of skill, so companies are investing early on in the technology. To be honest, my favorite customer service experience are ones where I tell a bot the issue, and they just refund me my cost, widely seen on delivery apps and Amazon. This is ripe for moral hazard but I'm sure there is monitoring happening for that as well.
alephnerd•15m ago
> I don't know how much more cost effective AI bots are for customer service over offshore call centers currently

They are already fairly cost effective. A the Corporate VC arms of the major call center and BPO players like Infosys, TCS, and others have already funded a large portion of TTS startups, and in a lot of cases are training on customer calls.

There's a reason ElevenLabs, Deepgram, and others are the giants they are now.

sdthjbvuiiijbb•24m ago
This is published by Bold Agents, a company that appears to provide a platform for AI customer service agents, and is based on their own data. Doesn't this really just mean that they're saying that their own product kind of sucks?

I believe Sierra is the market leader in this space with a few other companies like Salesforce and Decagon also competing. It would be more interesting to see an evaluation of performance by these parties before making sweeping claims about the performance of AI agents as a whole.

TrainedMonkey•20m ago
Some, maybe most, humans outperform AI. I've had some calls where I would have preferred an AI that could not understand me to an agent whom I could not understand AND who could barely understand me.
ge96•20m ago
Man that annoys me calling some place and it's that openai voice answering
silverFork•17m ago
don't worry, they will make Ai listen to the calls with human agents and in about a year, it will out perform them. Have you heard that "this call will be recorded" blah blah.. Now they will use those recordings... Time is on their side.
dmitrygr•16m ago
Support has costs. Fine. I consider purchases under $500 to not include support, and treat them all as "sold as is"

However, if I need support and cannot reach a real living breathing human in under 30 min regarding any purchase over $500, I hang up, call AmEx and file a chargeback, citing inability to gain support. So far they have backed me every time. If enough people do it, chargeback costs send the message.

bluedino•5m ago
I've used some great AI support agents/bots, whatever they're called. An example of a great one is Lemonade (the insurance company).

Most of the others are terrible. I'll pick on Dell for this next one. Their website in general, is terrible. Why would their support agent be any better?

We purchased a switch from Dell, that cost more than my SUV. Having a hardware issue with it, can't remember if it was fans or a power supply or what. It needs someone to come out and repair it, and we have the big fancy service plan.

There's no way to find the switch on the Dell support website. It's not listed anywhere.

https://www.dell.com/support/home/en-us/products/networking_...

You can't actually contact support, you have to identify your device, and then you get options from there.

https://www.dell.com/support/incidents-online/en-us/contactu...

However, this product doesn't have a service tag, or express service code, so you can't do that.

So you try to use the 'Virtual Assistant', who has no idea what you're trying to tell it, no matter which way you try. They link to a contact page but you just end up getting looped back around. There is no useful information to be extracted from this dumb thing.

I finally found a phone number on the website, and was connected to a woman who sounded like she was smoking cigarettes in a basement somewhere in Alabama. She looked through her notes on the computer, and found out for this particular switch I need to go through the OEM manufacturer. I was relieved to have gotten useful information.

f311a•11m ago
Some customers are smart too, they just use their own agents to flood support agents until the problem is resolved.
Avicebron•4m ago
As much as my gut is saying hell ya, this feels like giving quasi-monopolies an excuse to just not do any support...
missedthecue•15m ago
A lot of the HN crowd is a lot more technically capable than the average consumer. The more competent customers never see the 80-90% of inbound ticket volume that are items answered in FAQs that can be solved with an AI agent. They only know they had an edge case problem they couldn't resolve after quite a bit of effort. And the AI agent and canned responses were totally useless and frustrating barriers to the real help you needed (a person).

After putting in AI agents this year, our customer service scores went up considerably. And the reason was basically that the average customer was getting way faster answers to queries.

dataflow•10m ago
How does the average customer even get a hold of a human in the first place? The bots are so aggressively unwilling to connect you that I sometimes fail.
tintor•6m ago
Average scores going up, but what about tail? 90th / 95th / 99th percentile
missedthecue•4m ago
For us, they are still at the same scores as before AI agents.
lkbm•8m ago
I've gotten automatic refunds from Amazon bots. (I also got automatic credit from Lyft, but I consider that a failure because I wanted my money back.)