But even in fiction this is true: eventually one learns about the author and their life and this contributes a little also to the enjoyment of a work. But this isn't measured in these studies, which ignore everything that's important to being human.
An AI photograph similary can be enjoyed more than a real one based on its visual appeal, but the real one has the advantage of informing us about the experience of the photographer.
Modern algorithms and science always downplay the human sharing aspect and focus on a single dimension, to the detriment of us all.
techblueberry•35m ago
There can be important qualifications to this -> everyone's narrative is different. I think the gotcha around "people can't tell the difference between expensive and cheap wine" is double-sided. If you have the money, telling your self a story about wine that makes you appreciate it more probably enhances your life. If you don't have money - the opposite narrative is also worthwhile.
So, I'm not necessarily saying there aren't benefits to this, and this is the direction the world is going with like instagram reels and what not. But trying to boil the world down to which contextless dopamine trigger is most optimal. I'm not sure I think that leads to a happy life.
And in reverse - why not disclose how it's written? People are different, there are folks whose experience would be enhanced knowing it was written by AI.