At Researchly (https://www.researchly.at) we automate market and competitive analysis. We learned that on-the-fly web search through AI agents isn't reliable enough for consistent, in-depth work.

Existing data providers such as PitchBook or Crunchbase are either too expensive or lack the data we need: operational signals such as management changes or new partnerships, for DACH. Furthermore, search tools such as Exa tend to be probabilistic. What they return depends on the model and on SEO rankings, so two runs of the same query can give you two different answers.

So we built our own search layer: several providers (Exa, Linkup, Tavily, Parallel), allow/deny lists, source rankings (we once caught ourselves citing our own blog posts), and checks whether an empty result means "nothing there" or "out of budget".

It works, but: it's slow, expensive, non-deterministic & we kept redoing the same research for different clients (which makes it very un-economic).

So we started building the data layer itself. Step one was Firmendaten (300k companies from the Austrian register; shared here last week https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50142669).

Relational data like that is already a huge improvement, but what we really need is a graph, as people ask "W" questions: who does what with whom where and when. This is our first attempt at it.

For now, it just connects who partners with whom and company groups. (Tick "Beziehungen 2. Ebene" to see every partner and person)

It's small (a few dozen robotics companies) but you can already see how complex the graph gets & it serves as a good PoC for us.

We had wanted to build this for a long time, and it turned out to be far harder than we expected. One thing that sounds trivial but was particularly hard: finding the right website for a company.

You can buy that data. There are enrichment APIs that return a company's website. But even if they cover Austrian companies, how do you know which company they matched? There is no worldwide unique company identifier.

And if you do it yourself: how do you know that this website really belongs to this company? You have to validate every single match (e. g. through the imprint on a company's website in Austria).

There are quite a few more challenges involved, but we're happy with where this first, admittedly small, result has landed. Feedback very welcome – especially on which relationships would make a graph like this useful for you.

Feedback welcome!

Help! I have a manager!

Will Fiber-Optic Cables Get Made in Orbit? Maybe

Lighting the Skies

Filing My Taxes for Free with AI

Show HN: A desk gauge that shows how hot the Hacker News front page is

The Metaphysical Foundations of Conservatism (2021)

UIMorph: One sentence to a clickable app, site, or game

Show HN: Vmctl – a small, dependency-free macOS/Linux VM supervisor in Swift

Crypto Finds Its Ideal User: A Government with a Sanctions Problem

Use Temporal Foundation Model to predict drawing

MuscleMemory: Skills learned by Codex, reused by Claude Code

Whoops: Meta's Muse Share Links Disclosed All Sorts of Super-Sensitive User Data

How I Work with Agents

More and more iOS apps are stuck In Review since weeks

Markdown Is the New Executable: Attackers Drop Agent Instructions into Downloads

LiberNT

What's Next for Dora?

100 Levels of Agentic Engineering

Emulate Apple II on Raspberry Pi

AI coding agents hijacked using AGENTS.md file in Downloads folder

Nvidia RTX 20, 30, and 40-series GPUs hacked to remove a half-speed AI throttle

The Roots of the UK's New Censorship Agency

Werner Forssmann

Anthropic S-1

I Regret to Say That Gmail Is Now a Spam Farm

Show HN: Building the European Company Graph one website at a time

To detect deepfake videos, researchers turn to the physics of light

Show HN: HealthViewer – A local-first desktop app for tracking lab results

Enabling Researchers Is a Moral Imperative

DOJ says presidents should be able to sell secrets on eBay

Show HN: Logfolio – A public log for books, films, games and anything you keep