frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
494•klaussilveira•8h ago•135 comments

The Waymo World Model

https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-frontier-for-autonomous-driving-simula...
835•xnx•13h ago•499 comments

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

https://floedb.ai/blog/how-we-made-geo-joins-400-faster-with-h3-indexes
52•matheusalmeida•1d ago•9 comments

A century of hair samples proves leaded gas ban worked

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/a-century-of-hair-samples-proves-leaded-gas-ban-worked/
108•jnord•4d ago•17 comments

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

https://github.com/pydantic/monty
161•dmpetrov•8h ago•75 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
165•isitcontent•8h ago•18 comments

Dark Alley Mathematics

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/three-points/
59•quibono•4d ago•10 comments

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

https://vecti.com
274•vecti•10h ago•127 comments

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

https://eljojo.github.io/rememory/
221•eljojo•11h ago•138 comments

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

https://github.com/microsoft/litebox
337•aktau•14h ago•163 comments

Show HN: ARM64 Android Dev Kit

https://github.com/denuoweb/ARM64-ADK
11•denuoweb•1d ago•0 comments

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
332•ostacke•14h ago•89 comments

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

https://hackers-1995.vercel.app/
420•todsacerdoti•16h ago•221 comments

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

https://martypc.blogspot.com/2024/09/pc-floppy-copy-protection-vault-prolok.html
33•kmm•4d ago•2 comments

An Update on Heroku

https://www.heroku.com/blog/an-update-on-heroku/
354•lstoll•14h ago•246 comments

Delimited Continuations vs. Lwt for Threads

https://mirageos.org/blog/delimcc-vs-lwt
9•romes•4d ago•1 comments

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

https://github.com/phreda4/r3
56•phreda4•7h ago•9 comments

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/female-asian-elephant-calf-born-smithsonians-national-zoo-an...
14•gmays•3h ago•2 comments

How to effectively write quality code with AI

https://heidenstedt.org/posts/2026/how-to-effectively-write-quality-code-with-ai/
208•i5heu•11h ago•152 comments

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

https://infisical.com/blog/devops-to-solutions-engineering
121•vmatsiiako•13h ago•47 comments

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

https://developers.googleblog.com/introducing-the-developer-knowledge-api-and-mcp-server/
32•gfortaine•5h ago•6 comments

Learning from context is harder than we thought

https://hy.tencent.com/research/100025?langVersion=en
156•limoce•3d ago•79 comments

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

https://visualrambling.space/neural-network/
257•surprisetalk•3d ago•33 comments

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

https://kirkville.com/i-now-assume-that-all-ads-on-apple-news-are-scams/
1011•cdrnsf•17h ago•421 comments

FORTH? Really!?

https://rescrv.net/w/2026/02/06/associative
51•rescrv•16h ago•17 comments

I'm going to cure my girlfriend's brain tumor

https://andrewjrod.substack.com/p/im-going-to-cure-my-girlfriends-brain
89•ray__•4h ago•41 comments

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

https://red.anthropic.com/2026/zero-days/
43•lebovic•1d ago•12 comments

How virtual textures work

https://www.shlom.dev/articles/how-virtual-textures-really-work/
34•betamark•15h ago•29 comments

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

https://docs.smooth.sh/cli/overview
78•antves•1d ago•59 comments

Show HN: Slack CLI for Agents

https://github.com/stablyai/agent-slack
43•nwparker•1d ago•11 comments
Open in hackernews

A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)

https://science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/collapsing-star-gives-birth-to-a-black-hole/
77•bfeist•9mo ago

Comments

bell-cot•9mo ago
It's been a while since I crawled Wikipedia's rabbit hole on this - but I recall there being regions of the stellar "mass vs. metallicity" graph in which direct collapse to a black hole is the expected outcome.

Is there an astrophysicist in the house?

metalman•9mo ago
not an astro anything, but the easy question is how does the sun switch off it's light output so suddenly as to cause a perfect garavitational collapse presumably it has to be a large metal rich star and exist without too much local gas or a companion star one thing is clear at this point is that the variety of stelar and galactic variability is much larger than what was predicted even a few decades ago, though the idea of a star just neatly removing itself from this universe when it's done, is very strange indeed
madaxe_again•9mo ago
It doesn’t necessarily switch anything off or collapse - it’s possible for a star of the right mass and density to simply end up with a core that is held up only by degeneracy pressure, and the core slowly shrinks as it cools until it lies within its schwarzschild radius, and the rest of the star is either quietly consumed by this relatively slow process, or just escapes as though nothing much happened. Which from the outside looks like the star just turning off.
MoonGhost•9mo ago
It cannot just escape without a push as the gravity is still the same?
saltcured•9mo ago
I assume they meant until all the mass collapses across the threshold, the remaining shell of the star outside is still radiating energy and a "solar" wind, which is particles escaping. So some is escaping away while some is slipping under.
magicalhippo•9mo ago
Seems this is the case for both supermassive black hole formation[1][2], and stellar direct-collapse black holes due to failed supernova[3].

But yeah, just a layman so hopefully someone knowledgeable chimes in.

[1]: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa863

[2]: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acda94

[3]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23856

udev4096•9mo ago
(2017)
verbify•9mo ago
[22 million years ago]
wizzwizz4•9mo ago
That's subjective. Objectively, all we can say is that it happened before 2017.
gerad•9mo ago
No it’s relative. ;)
pavel_lishin•9mo ago
Well, it certainly didn't happen tomorrow.
exe34•9mo ago
in some reference frames, yes.
wizzwizz4•9mo ago
No, not if we've observed it. There are predicted historical events which can be shunted into the future by running away bravely, but if you've seen them happen, you can only change how long ago.
exe34•9mo ago
not for us, but in some other reference frame.
wizzwizz4•9mo ago
If by "reference frame" you mean "observer who lives in the past", then yes: the past is sometimes the future of a more distant past.
exe34•9mo ago
no, relativity allows for reference frames where the event hasn't happened yet, even though it has happened for you. there's no simultaneous "it has already happened" for all frames.
wizzwizz4•9mo ago
There is if the event is in the past or future light cone. If A sends a signal to B, and B receives it, there is no reference frame where that signal went backwards in time. (Unless you count exotic ones, like "particle with imaginary rest mass is zooming along at thrice the speed of light", but you can't accelerate to such a reference frame so I don't.)
Scarblac•9mo ago
That was in 2017, it's 22000008 years ago now.
subscribed•9mo ago
Time doesn't pass uniformly :)
roman_soldier•9mo ago
Could be an advanced civilisation sucking all the stars energy into the back of their spaceship.
m4rtink•9mo ago
More likely just someone feeding all the mass of the star to a black hole for industrial purposes - eq. a Deep Well Industrial Zone: https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/464790d2497de

Orions Arm even has a story about how such process might look like: https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/46709da5de6be

You basically let material stream into a black hole, it forms an acreation disk which gets very hot and dense even before the material actually falls into the black hole. The temperatture and pressure is high enough to trigger nucleosynthetic fusion reactions that generate heavy elements from lighter stuff, like the abundant hydrogen and helium. And a lot of "process heat" that can be used as energy source for other purposes. :)

NKosmatos•9mo ago
Or it could be the sun eating dragon :-)

Joking aside, it could be a Kardashev Type II (or higher) civilization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

They could have used a dense Dyson sphere to “suck” the energy of the star, but if that was the case we would be able to detect its infrared radiation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

Anyway, I prefer the giant star eating dragon alternative ;-)

chgs•9mo ago
And then where does it go?
adonovan•9mo ago
Perhaps a superadvanced civilization training an AI model on all remaining negative entropy in their solar system so they can more effectively create realistic propaganda for the upcoming election on their now rather chilly mars colony.
keepamovin•9mo ago
Or something just moved in front of it. It did not rage against the dying of the light, the definition of out with a whimper.
y42•9mo ago
>As many as 30 percent of such stars, it seems, may quietly collapse into black holes — no supernova required.
WhitneyLand•9mo ago
Like people spent years of their life scientifically studying the problem and didn’t think of this before making the claim?

It was multi-wave analysis not just visible light, IR spread can differentiate this.

It’s been missing since 2015. Probability of something being large enough to cover the star and stay on a path completely obscuring it for 10 years is shall we say, not likely.

It didn’t rage against the dying of the light, it just switched off.

gpvos•9mo ago
TFA says the astronomers checked for that. It's still a possibility, but pretty unlikely.
amelius•9mo ago
What is the timespan of such an event?
ben_w•9mo ago
Depends how you define the boundry of the event itself, both in space and in time.

Stellar cores are relatively small, and the infalling matter is essentially in freefall at high g, gets to a significant fraction of c in about 0.1 seconds.

The visible disk of a red supergiant — of the kind that can supernova or surprise us by failing — is on the order of multiple AU radius, so speed of light limits there are in the tens of minutes.

andrewstuart•9mo ago
It’s a weird and scary thought.

Imagine seeing that up fairly close - a massive star just shrivel into a black hole and wink out.

pavel_lishin•9mo ago
I'd love to see a realistic render of this.
bell-cot•9mo ago
Here's a short (12 page) and pretty easy article from The Astrophysical Journal (2003), about end of life for massive stars. And why some would "directly" collapse (no big & bright supernova) into black holes.

https://open.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&co...

therealfiona•9mo ago
Here is an article about some JWST data of the star.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16121

mikhailfranco•9mo ago

  As many as 30 percent of such stars 
  may quietly collapse into black holes
  no supernova required.
where 'such' refers to 25 solar mass stars.

Is that a significant contribution to 'dark matter'?