frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

France's homegrown open source online office suite

https://github.com/suitenumerique
430•nar001•4h ago•204 comments

British drivers over 70 to face eye tests every three years

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c205nxy0p31o
134•bookofjoe•1h ago•113 comments

Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)

https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2009/commands-with-comma/
438•theblazehen•2d ago•158 comments

Leisure Suit Larry's Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and Disney

https://spillhistorie.no/2026/02/06/interview-with-sierra-veteran-al-lowe/
26•thelok•1h ago•2 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
86•AlexeyBrin•5h ago•17 comments

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
778•klaussilveira•19h ago•241 comments

Stories from 25 Years of Software Development

https://susam.net/twenty-five-years-of-computing.html
35•vinhnx•3h ago•4 comments

First Proof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05192
38•samasblack•2h ago•24 comments

Software Factories and the Agentic Moment

https://factory.strongdm.ai/
20•mellosouls•2h ago•17 comments

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12501
56•onurkanbkrc•4h ago•3 comments

The Waymo World Model

https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-frontier-for-autonomous-driving-simula...
1027•xnx•1d ago•584 comments

Coding agents have replaced every framework I used

https://blog.alaindichiappari.dev/p/software-engineering-is-back
173•alainrk•4h ago•231 comments

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

https://jesperordrup.github.io/vocal-guide/
168•jesperordrup•10h ago•62 comments

A Fresh Look at IBM 3270 Information Display System

https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/a-fresh-look-at-ibm-3270-information-display-system
24•rbanffy•4d ago•5 comments

StrongDM's AI team build serious software without even looking at the code

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/7/software-factory/
18•simonw•2h ago•15 comments

Unseen Footage of Atari Battlezone Arcade Cabinet Production

https://arcadeblogger.com/2026/02/02/unseen-footage-of-atari-battlezone-cabinet-production/
103•videotopia•4d ago•27 comments

Vinklu Turns Forgotten Plot in Bucharest into Tiny Coffee Shop

https://design-milk.com/vinklu-turns-forgotten-plot-in-bucharest-into-tiny-coffee-shop/
5•surprisetalk•5d ago•0 comments

72M Points of Interest

https://tech.marksblogg.com/overture-places-pois.html
13•marklit•5d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
265•isitcontent•20h ago•33 comments

Making geo joins faster with H3 indexes

https://floedb.ai/blog/how-we-made-geo-joins-400-faster-with-h3-indexes
152•matheusalmeida•2d ago•42 comments

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

https://github.com/pydantic/monty
277•dmpetrov•20h ago•147 comments

Ga68, a GNU Algol 68 Compiler

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/PEXRTN-ga68-intro/
35•matt_d•4d ago•10 comments

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

https://hackers-1995.vercel.app/
546•todsacerdoti•1d ago•263 comments

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
419•ostacke•1d ago•110 comments

What Is Ruliology?

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/01/what-is-ruliology/
65•helloplanets•4d ago•69 comments

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

https://vecti.com
364•vecti•22h ago•164 comments

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

https://eljojo.github.io/rememory/
338•eljojo•22h ago•207 comments

Show HN: Kappal – CLI to Run Docker Compose YML on Kubernetes for Local Dev

https://github.com/sandys/kappal
16•sandGorgon•2d ago•4 comments

An Update on Heroku

https://www.heroku.com/blog/an-update-on-heroku/
457•lstoll•1d ago•301 comments

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

https://github.com/microsoft/litebox
372•aktau•1d ago•195 comments
Open in hackernews

America's reputation drops across the world

https://www.ipsos.com/en/americas-reputation-drops-across-the-world
127•mrtksn•9mo ago

Comments

nottorp•9mo ago
Consent-O-Matic goes into an infinite loop on their site. On Firefox at least.
keerthiko•9mo ago
yep (zen). same on arc/chrome
TonyTrapp•9mo ago
Note that you can click on the Consent-O-Matic toolbar entry and submit the site for review (which I did).
onel•9mo ago
Yeah, there's an open issue in GitHub for it. Hope they fix it soon
jqpabc123•9mo ago
Nice to see that most people in the world can identify a con artist when they see one --- even if US voters can't.

America has 2 major exports --- stability and debt. And these are interconnected. When stability declines, financing debt becomes more expensive.

The current administration is struggling to figure this out.

fastball•9mo ago
In the current admin's defense, that is a terrible pair of major exports in a world that has already started to move away from Globalism.

You can't maintain that if the primary "consumers" of those exports are not actual allies.

jqpabc123•9mo ago
You can't maintain that if the primary "consumers" of those exports are not actual allies.

Yes, all the more reason why attacking our allies is pure insanity.

A lot of the countries we just attacked in the "trade war" are the same ones who buy our Treasury bonds.

"Tariff Man" failed to make this obvious connection until after it was demonstrated to him. T-Bill yields jumped half a percent in a week after he made a complete fool of himself with "Liberation Day" in the WH rose garden. With one act of utter stupidity, "Tariff Man" cost the country more than DOGE has saved.

fastball•9mo ago
Oh for sure, they're not doing a good job. My point is only that I don't believe the status quo was maintainable, so "they could've just maintained the status quo" isn't a good position either.
jqpabc123•9mo ago
My point is that something demonstrably worse than the "status quo" is actually regression --- the opposite of progress --- one of the dumbest possible positions.

In other words, unforced economic suicide is certainly an option to end the status quo --- but not a very good/desirable one.

jjulius•9mo ago
>... even if US voters can't.

Because blanket generalizations suck, I'll point out that 48.34% of voters did recognize a con artist.

pupppet•9mo ago
Not nearly high enough. And the rest of the world is watching a good chunk of that disapproving half sit on their thumbs while he tears the country apart.
tzs•9mo ago
Maybe higher--I think you may have ignored third party candidates. 50.2% voted for someone other than Trump.
BobaFloutist•9mo ago
I hope you know how funny it is to accuse American third party voters of being able to identify a con.
chneu•9mo ago
Oh knock it off. As an American this mentality is so dumb. It's not a gotcha. It just shows how many Americans either voted for him or didn't vote at all, which is a vote for trump.

So really, the vast majority of Americans, in practicality, voted for trump.

jjulius•9mo ago
>Oh knock it off. As an American this mentality is so dumb.

Thanks for the constructive feedback.

I genuinely hope you enjoy the rest of your day. :)

chneu•9mo ago
Nice try on taking the high road.

The honest truth is that americans voted against democrats, not for republicans. Your mentality shows how ignorant people are willfully being. Many people sat out the election because all candidates were garbage, and democrats made it worse.

Democrats put up a BLACK WOMAN as their candidate and then acted surprised that a majority of americans said "no thanks". Then democrats like to act like "Oh we would have won if more people just voted", which ignores the reality of what happened.

jjulius•9mo ago
>Nice try on taking the high road.

For what it's worth, I don't disagree with some of what you're saying. I just don't feel like it's productive to engage with someone who starts off a conversation by telling someone to "Knock it off" and then proceeds to call their perspective dumb. I'm happy to chat, but your attitude and tone suggest that your heels are firmly dug in and you aren't actually interested in a constructive dialogue. I could be wrong, but your doubling down by attacking my politeness suggests that maybe I'm not. At any rate, I'll pass.

Like I said, enjoy your night!

pabs3•9mo ago
Was that due to racism or sexism or what?
DougN7•9mo ago
I suspect a little of both. Plus some people were turned off by the forced democratic “primary”. I remember similar sentiments when Hillary ran. I just realized Trump has only won when running against a woman. I think we’re just not quite ready for a female president, for whatever reason.
mmastrac•9mo ago
Elect a ___ expect a ___.

Honestly this next four years is going to be great everywhere else now that we're becoming desensitized to the news again.

I've never seen such a unifying figure in my life -- and the opportunity for Canada in the next decade is huge.

Decoupling is a surgical procedure we've been putting off for too long.

Gualdrapo•9mo ago
> Elect a ___ expect a ___.

I liked that turkish saying that goes like "When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a sultan. The palace becomes a circus."

tritiy•9mo ago
I've learned a new cool saying, thanks :)
bix6•9mo ago
Surprised it could get any lower. We elect clowns to office and exalt psychopaths to leadership in industry. What happened to community and civic duty?
morkalork•9mo ago
That's socialism. Just going off of wordplay, America's ideals are anti-social.
bix6•9mo ago
Careful mentioning the S word! You might get locked up for thinking about someone besides yourself.
the_snooze•9mo ago
> “[Ford said] ".. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."

> "Odd," said Arthur. "I thought you said it was a democracy."

> "I did," said Ford. "It is."

> "So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?"

> "It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they voted in more or less approximates to the government they want."

> "You mean they actually vote for the lizards?"

> "Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."

> "But," said Arthur, going in for the big one again, "why?"

> "Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in.”

Negative partisanship is a hell of a drug.

Gud•9mo ago
This is the issue with representative democracy.

Hence why we need to work for direct democracy. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to get there because it is not in the interest of your representatives, or so they believe.

Isamu•9mo ago
>Only six months ago 52% of Canadians saw the US as a positive influencer; now only 19% feel the same. This 33-point fall is the largest recorded for any country.

Not shocking, we’re all bundled into a clown car, you get that lurching “here we go” feeling.

ingen0s•9mo ago
Sometimes you have to lose a battle in order to win a war. Anyways, God bless America - from Canada.
foogazi•9mo ago
1814 never forget
brink•9mo ago
I think that was kind of the point? The political right in America felt that a "good reputation" was costing us too much. They seem to care about other things more than their reputation.
whynotmaybe•9mo ago
> China is now seen as a more positive influence than the US. It’s the first time this has been the case during the ten years we have tracked this question. Across the 29 countries covered, an average of 49% say China will have positive effect on world affairs, up 10 points on six months ago.

That's the real change.

The drop of America is consistent with it's president behaviour towards its allies, but it's still surprising that it's so intense that now China seems better for the world than it was a few months ago, even though nothing really changed.

pixelpoet•9mo ago
> even though nothing really changed

Rocking the world's financial markets and disappearing people is nothing? I honestly don't know how to process such an opinion...

soco•9mo ago
They probably meant that nothing has changed on the Chinese side to make them suddenly 10% more trustworthy.
whynotmaybe•9mo ago
Exactly what I should have written.
ZeroGravitas•9mo ago
They did get to respond publicly to the trade war threats against them and seem to be doing pretty well in supporting the global rules based order as part of that.

Worth a couple of points at least.

karmakurtisaani•9mo ago
I think people tend to think in relative rather than absolute terms here. US going unpredictable makes China seem relatively better, which doesn't translate so well on some absolute scale.

Possibly a better poll would be to arrange the countries in order of trustworthiness etc.

gaoryrt•9mo ago
They said no to the US about the tariff war.
throwaway5752•9mo ago
"even though nothing really changed."

I have seen estimates that dissolving USAID has caused 10,000 excess deaths, so far.

They threatened three countries with military invasion.

They placed real punitive tariffs on most of the world besides Russia.

They began abducting legal foreign residents and sending some to a foreign prison camp, and not complying with legal orders to return them.

They are responsible for a surge of detained foreign visitors at the border in prison like conditions, sometimes with limited access to their embassies.

They disavowed NATO, saying Europe would have to be responsible for its own security.

I could go on, but China is in fact a more reliable and a more responsible world actor than the US now.

whynotmaybe•9mo ago
Nothing has changed for China and they're now reliable thanks to USA's actions.
palata•9mo ago
China is not openly and repeatedly threatening to invade its allies militarily. And I say "allies", but at this point it's rather "partners". And those ex-allies wish they did not depend so much on the US.
p3rls•9mo ago
China has only one ally, North Korea. Singular. A real dream team of human flourishing.
palata•9mo ago
Are you trying to say that it's better to have an "ally" that threatens to invade you than having a "partner" that doesn't?
DeH40•9mo ago
In fact, China pursues a policy of non-alignment, so it has no allies
p3rls•9mo ago
Hope this helps, idiot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_Friendship,_Cooperat...

gaoryrt•9mo ago
Isn't Pakistan considered an ally?
dragonwriter•9mo ago
Of China? Technically, I believe, no, in the sense of having a mutual defense pact; practically, yes, at least, more so than they are of, say, the US (with whom they also do not have a mutual defense pact), which has legally designated Pakistan a "major non-NATO ally".
Ekaros•9mo ago
It is reasonable view point considering history that you don't necessarily have allies. Well Europe had them. But most of the world being screwed over time after time have extremely good reasons to not trust west.

China being all about business is very reasonable, both sides will try to do best for themselves. Which is power dynamic that you can trust to continue.

duxup•9mo ago
America's enemies couldn't do this much damage if they tried, but the Trump administration is happy to weaken our country on the inside and outside.
ndsipa_pomu•9mo ago
It's fairly obvious that Trump is Putin's pawn
DougN7•9mo ago
That is definitely the easiest solution to come to.
hattmall•9mo ago
I wonder why it is that they didn't poll China with this question?
dgfitz•9mo ago
I don't understand why this is important.

Maybe if you run an international business? So like, 0.01% of citizens?

I actually kind of like that the US is no longer being put on a pedestal. Let someone else have a turn. See how they do, maybe good things will happen.

mrtksn•9mo ago
Apple, Google, Amazon, Netflix, Meta, Tesla and many more US companies operate internationally and their valuations are based on their ability to serve billions of people globally. You will have very different valuations, profits and salaries if those end up with a market of 330M people instead.

I suspect that more than %0.01 of the Americans will be impacted.

dgfitz•9mo ago
I didn't mention impacted, I said important.

Is it a bad thing if those giant tech companies come back down to earth? I would argue no. They do not provide value, they extract it, generally, and play shitty games with taxes.

What good does Meta provide to humanity? Why do I pay netflix to watch ads? Why does google ignore their own search api directives when I put a word in quotes? (To show ads) The only possible actual value amazon created is AWS, the rest is peddling garbage products from garbage vendors. Apple lost the plot somehow with their sw/hw stack, they could use a wakeup. And tesla, ironically, seems poised to be the first domino to tip, the cybertruck is a disaster.

If those companies have such a significant impact on global citizens, they probably should blow up, that isn't a "good thing" at all, that much influence.

mrtksn•9mo ago
Those writing JS at Meta won't start making cars. It's just that US will become poorer overall and some might feel better for themselves that they are not in Software. If you are anti-USA I guess that's something desired.
bryanlarsen•9mo ago
Farmers are almost all international businesses, and that's 2% of the population right there.
dgfitz•9mo ago
I believe US farmers export 20% internationally. And most of the farmers I know have told me only a small handful of farmers are in that group of exporters, the biggest players. The "little guy" will be fine.
bryanlarsen•9mo ago
20% of farmers are big enough to skip the wholesalers and sell internationally. The other 80% sell to local wholesalers to sell internationally. And even though most wheat et al is consumed in the US, a significant amount is exported. A small drop in demand can have a massive impact on price.

"100 supply, 101 demand: price goes up. 100 supply, 99 demand: price goes down."

palata•9mo ago
I find it interesting that the US reputation in South America seems pretty good.

Pretty sure that the US reputation dropped during Trump's first term, but this time he surely has broken his personal record. Also I think this time it's not only Trump: his oligarchs probably had an influence on that (starting with Musk and his Nazi salutes).

Of course, the threats to invade Canada and EU territories (amongst others) had an impact, too. As for the tariffs, I really feel like it's helping China's reputation: they stay strong against the bully who seems to be about to lose that battle.

erxam•9mo ago
South America is also having its Trump moment currently, even if it's not as extreme.

But with Milei in Argentina, Noboa in Ecuador, Bolsonaro in Brasil and the upheaval in Chile and Colombia, there's plenty of far-right stupidity to go around and keep supporting Trump even if he's not playing nice.

And there's also the elephant in the room that's Venezuela. You see it with Venezuelans all the time. Even though they're being targeted by the Trump administration, they all still love him as if he were some sort of messiah just because he's opposed to Maduro.

xnx•9mo ago
This is also evident in the recent USD exchange rate: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DEXUSEU
penguin_booze•9mo ago
If you hire a clown, expect a circus.
coreyh14444•9mo ago
Can we talk about how HN's "flag" feature is being used to suppress topics that tech-right folks don't want to hear? Every single post critical of Musk or Trump gets flagged to oblivion these days.
tda•9mo ago
I have transitioned to news.ycombinator.com/active now, works for me now
bryanlarsen•9mo ago
I use hckrnews.com
kayge•9mo ago
Same, and FWIW I just recently noticed that [flagged] stories will continue showing up on the 'Top X' feeds (if they're popular enough), but they drop off if you're browsing the 'Homepage' feed.
AnimalMuppet•9mo ago
I think it's more that every single post about Musk or Trump gets flagged to oblivion these days. (I mean, that's about the same thing, because just about every post that's about them is critical of them.)

Some of it is Musk fanboys and Trump shills and Russian political operatives and such. I'm sure some of that is going on.

But some of it is just regular HN users who are sick and tired of political stories. There have been a huge increase in political stories in the past three months. And even if some of the stories are interesting, to some people, the second story in 12 hours isn't interesting, and the third similar story this week also isn't interesting.

Some people are here instead of Reddit for a reason. They don't want HN to turn into Reddit. So they tend to flag political (or politics-adjacent) stories, unless they are directly tech-relevant - and maybe even then.

Karrot_Kream•9mo ago
I agree with you but FWIW I think a lot of folks on this site want HN to be Reddit. I think a lot of people these days use HN as another big subreddit and modulate their content and voting behavior on that basis. If anything, I think a lot of people left Reddit because they disapproved of the API changes and began to use HN the same way they used Reddit because they felt that HN's ownership aligned with their ideas of how to run a site better. The draw to them is the different ownership not different decorum or voting behaviors. If anything, the decorum and voting behavior on Reddit is probably their expectation for engaging with upvote-based social media. You can see this behavior leaking into a lot of other threads on this site, not just the political ones.

I don't flag these stories, but I do think this "fight" is one we'll eventually lose. The majority of users here want to use HN as another Reddit. They don't really care about what made HN different. As such I think it's time for us to accept the new normal. Our party is over.

erxam•9mo ago
To be entirely fair... have you seen who's headlining the AI startup school pinned at the bottom of this site?

It's Musk. Rather obviously they're going to try avoiding alienating him as much as possible.

ndsipa_pomu•9mo ago
I wish Musk put as much effort into not alienating all non-Nazis