https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/doc/harmonyos-guide...
I'd certainly be interested in benchmarks of running TypeScript via ArkTS vs transpiled JS in in V8.
So Windows is super slow, but no way this could be even slower? How can it be usable at all?
Unfortunately the barrier to entry seems to be sending government identity to Huawei, and I'm not willing to do that to get access to their software development kits. There'a source available at least for the earlier OpenHarmony forks, but figuring out how to take all the pieces and weave together a working OS is probably quite complex & undocumented. Here's some kind of developer centric openEuler link, https://github.com/openeuler-mirror/dsoftbus_standard
There's been such a dearth of clear advancement for users in OSes, in IoT, in distributed computing. It looks like there's something super super cool here, but so far, that view has mostly been some 5 or 10 second clips amid product promos and demoes. .
I feel great about a third platform pushing the UI space to something newer (like iOS created touch centric UI).
I feel great about a new approach to kernel science. (Like ChromeOS did).
But I am afraid of a bill-gates era move to crush competitors. (Let’s credit BG for making the innovation space un-innovative deeply linear and unifying!)
And I am afraid of the interfaces I have come to love be destroyed and brought to ruin by “copying” upcoming platforms (like in Windows 8/10/11).
And I am afraid that consumers and developers will be segmented and overwhelmed with new styles of doing things that they will give up entirely.
Plurality in the computer market is a good thing. You should be more scared of the monopoly of a company like MS over desktop OS for personal computers. That's what made it possible for the government to enact barriers against other countries, like they're doing with China.
I hope US/Europe's OSs can learn something from it.
edit: not translating the page makes the captcha even easier, and I am an idiot.
I don't know the answers to the questions of international cooperation and economic imbalances, but I am pretty confident that this is not the way. I haven't seen sufficient evidence to the contrary.
All of that being said, it's great to see a new operating system that (if I understand correctly) isn't just derived from an existing one.
The reasoning behind cutting them off through the methods you listed is to force them to move to self-sufficiency on your terms without as much access to your technology.
As the famous roll pen examplify, China can definitely make high tech products and it's more a question if economical relevance whether they will intensify in that direction
https://theasymmetric.substack.com/p/china-ballpoint-pen-mac...
Huawei Technologies on Thursday unveiled its first laptop that runs the company’s self-developed operating system, HarmonyOS, following the expiration of its Microsoft Windows license for personal computers (PCs) in March.
What kind of Windows license are we talking about here? I understood that Huawei is a hardware manufacturer. Any Windows license on a laptop they deliver would be an OEM license attached to the device, right? Are they saying that Huawei lost its contract to sell Windows OEM licenses with the devices it manufactures?
Is that a thing? Does Microsoft say to hardware makers that no, you cannot sell your hardware with Windows? What kind of dispute between Microsoft and Huawei leads to that outcome?
US sanctions against Huawei mean that they can't sign a renewal.
So its really an export license from the US government that is expiring.
>Make development enjoyable with distributed technologies
>Hardware synergy for resource sharing
>HarmonyOS treats different smart devices into a single super device, behind which all devices work collaboratively and share their resources to offer a seamless experience for users.
Does anyone know what this means, because it sounds amazing. Does the OS natively VPN all your devices and expose their storage/computes/etc in a Plan9-esque way?
Not very exciting IMO.
Uhm, I don't think so. How did you came up with that impression?
It sounds more like IOT
For now sticking with MacOS
One of the clear benefits of US/China’s Trade War is that we are seeing competitors to monopolies on both sides as both countries fear decoupling has a decent probability of happening and they don’t want to be left short.
[1] YeeHeart Inc sells the Windows and macOS builds, but Linux versions are only available on the Chinese version of their site. Kylin package can be installed on Wayland-enabled Ubuntu. The UI seems to be Chinese-only. On-topic: they have a HarmonyOS Next port as well.
jmclnx•6h ago
But it does look interesting and they probably have a huge worldwide market that the US is now locking themselves out of.
coliveira•6h ago
suraci•6h ago
i guess they were "protect"ing their users
:)
Additionally, I have always been curious to know whether the U.S. export ban applies to Linux and any other open source projects
dismalaf•6h ago
It does, the Linux kernel maintainers eventually said that's the reason for banning Russian maintainers.
aleph_minus_one•5h ago
As craftkiller interline in a sibling post (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43927430): would this not rather imply that you should ban US-American maintainers (at least on some subsystems)?
If Russian maintainers write some Linux kernel code, this will cause no problem for a US export ban. On the other hand, if US-American maintainer does, it might.
comex•5h ago
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whNGNVnYHHSXUAsWds_MoZ-iEg...
I do not know the details myself.
SahAssar•4h ago
It could be argued that you could ban imports from russia by not allowing them to contribute code, but an export ban is basically impossible.
dismalaf•4h ago
dragonelite•2h ago
simion314•6h ago
craftkiller•5h ago
> Of course, our project needs people to work on these systems. If any non-American cryptographer who meets the constraints listed earlier is interested in helping out with embedded cryptography in OpenBSD, please contact us.
https://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html
severino•6h ago
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/05/huawei-matebook-x-pro-20...
dragonelite•2h ago
mensetmanusman•5h ago
joshuaissac•4h ago
The initial smartphone version of HarmonyOS 2 from a few years ago was just an Android reskin,[1] despite claims to the contrary from Huwaei, and unlike HarmonyOS 1 for IoT devices. It remains to be seen if HarmonyOS for PC really is an independent OS, a fork or a reskin/distro of an existing OS.
1. https://www.techspot.com/news/88512-huawei-harmonyos-20-poor...
hulitu•4h ago
TBH, Linux is nowadays too bloated to be taken as a reference. The BSDs look more promising as a starting point.
Ekaros•1h ago