frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Don't rent the cloud, own instead

https://blog.comma.ai/datacenter/
367•Torq_boi•5h ago•158 comments

When internal hostnames are leaked to the clown

https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/02/03/badnas/
210•zdw•6h ago•112 comments

The Missing Layer

https://yagmin.com/blog/the-missing-layer/
11•lubujackson•56m ago•1 comments

Nanobot: Ultra-Lightweight Alternative to OpenClaw

https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot
18•ms7892•2h ago•8 comments

Show HN: Micropolis/SimCity Clone in Emacs Lisp

https://github.com/vkazanov/elcity
23•vkazanov•2h ago•4 comments

Making Ferrite Core Inductors at Home

https://danielmangum.com/posts/making-ferrite-core-inductors-home/
18•hasheddan•2d ago•3 comments

Wirth's Revenge

https://jmoiron.net/blog/wirths-revenge/
73•signa11•8h ago•17 comments

Adobe Animate will be discontinued effective March 1, 2026

https://helpx.adobe.com/uk/animate/kb/end-of-life.html
43•g0ld3nrati0•2d ago•33 comments

Sqldef: Idempotent schema management tool for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite

https://sqldef.github.io/
180•Palmik•4d ago•38 comments

Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

https://boxc.net/blog/2026/claude-code-connecting-to-local-models-when-your-quota-runs-out/
291•fugu2•3d ago•151 comments

Battle-Testing Lynx at Allegro

https://blog.allegro.tech/2026/02/battle-testing-lynx-js-at-allegro.html
6•tgebarowski•1h ago•1 comments

A few CPU hardware bugs

https://www.taricorp.net/2026/a-few-cpu-bugs/
72•signa11•8h ago•17 comments

AI is killing B2B SaaS

https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-killing-b2b-saas
365•namanyayg•18h ago•565 comments

A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

https://pdfa.org/a-case-study-in-pdf-forensics-the-epstein-pdfs/
310•DuffJohnson•20h ago•179 comments

Microsoft's Copilot chatbot is running into problems

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/microsofts-pivotal-ai-product-is-running-into-big-problems-ce235b28
223•fortran77•19h ago•253 comments

OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

https://www.jakequist.com/thoughts/openclaw-is-what-apple-intelligence-should-have-been
349•jakequist•11h ago•291 comments

If you've got Nothing to Hide (2015)

https://jacquesmattheij.com/if-you-have-nothing-to-hide/
57•jacquesm•2h ago•48 comments

Claude Code for Infrastructure

https://www.fluid.sh/
220•aspectrr•17h ago•155 comments

I built a search engine to index the un-indexable parts of Telegram

https://telehunt.org
32•alenmangattu•3d ago•9 comments

A Broken Heart

https://allenpike.com/2026/a-broken-heart/
3•memalign•4d ago•0 comments

Remarkable Pro Colors

https://www.thregr.org/wavexx/rnd/20260201-remarkable_pro_colors/
109•ffaser5gxlsll•3d ago•44 comments

Postgres Postmaster does not scale

https://www.recall.ai/blog/postgres-postmaster-does-not-scale
100•davidgu•19h ago•45 comments

Modernizing Linux swapping: introducing the swap table

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1056405/e728d95dd16f5e1b/
61•chmaynard•4h ago•59 comments

Voxtral Transcribe 2

https://mistral.ai/news/voxtral-transcribe-2
911•meetpateltech•20h ago•223 comments

Building a 24-bit arcade CRT display adapter from scratch

https://www.scd31.com/posts/building-an-arcade-display-adapter
162•evakhoury•18h ago•44 comments

An interactive version of Byrne's The Elements of Euclid (1847)

https://c82.net/euclid/
39•tzury•2d ago•5 comments

Why S7 Scheme? (2020)

https://iainctduncan.github.io/scheme-for-max-docs/s7.html
29•bmacho•5d ago•3 comments

Lily Programming Language

https://lily-lang.org
53•FascinatedBox•3d ago•35 comments

Listen to Understand

https://talk.bradwoods.io/blog/listen-to-understand/
59•bradwoodsio•4d ago•10 comments

The Great Unwind

https://occupywallst.com/yen
274•jart•17h ago•263 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•9mo ago

Comments

wahern•8mo ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•8mo ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•8mo ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•8mo ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•8mo ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•8mo ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•8mo ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•8mo ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•8mo ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•8mo ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•8mo ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•8mo ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•8mo ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•8mo ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.