frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

LLM=True

https://blog.codemine.be/posts/2026/20260222-be-quiet/
55•avh3•1h ago•43 comments

Show HN: A real-time strategy game that AI agents can play

https://llmskirmish.com/
16•__cayenne__•24m ago•1 comments

I'm helping my dog vibe code games

https://www.calebleak.com/posts/dog-game/
924•cleak•17h ago•282 comments

Turing Completeness of GNU find

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20762
53•todsacerdoti•5h ago•6 comments

Pi – A minimal terminal coding harness

https://pi.dev
383•kristianpaul•12h ago•168 comments

Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3

https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine
247•petewarden•12h ago•52 comments

Japanese Death Poems

https://www.secretorum.life/p/japanese-death-poems-part-3
43•NaOH•2d ago•9 comments

Mercury 2: Fast reasoning LLM powered by diffusion

https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/blog/introducing-mercury-2
231•fittingopposite•11h ago•98 comments

Show HN: Quantifying opportunity cost with a deliberately "simple" web app

https://shouldhavebought.com/
19•b0bbi•18h ago•19 comments

Cl-kawa: Scheme on Java on Common Lisp

https://github.com/atgreen/cl-kawa
38•varjag•2d ago•8 comments

Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/02/apple-accelerates-us-manufacturing-with-mac-mini-production/
519•haunter•13h ago•505 comments

Hacking an old Kindle to display bus arrival times

https://www.mariannefeng.com/portfolio/kindle/
269•mengchengfeng•14h ago•67 comments

Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment

https://github.com/generalaction/emdash
159•onecommit•16h ago•60 comments

I pitched a roller coaster to Disneyland at age 10 in 1978

https://wordglyph.xyz/one-piece-at-a-time
465•wordglyph•21h ago•165 comments

Nearby Glasses

https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses
338•zingerlio•16h ago•132 comments

Steel Bank Common Lisp

https://www.sbcl.org/
217•tosh•16h ago•85 comments

Show HN: Scheme-langserver – Digest incomplete code with static analysis

https://github.com/ufo5260987423/scheme-langserver
5•ufo5260987423•1d ago•0 comments

Amazon accused of widespread scheme to inflate prices across the economy

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/amazon-busted-for-widespread-price
439•toomuchtodo•9h ago•148 comments

Meta problem with URPF our bundle in Boca raton

https://metafixthis.com/
24•synthesis5x•1d ago•1 comments

Half million 'Words with Spaces' missing from dictionaries

https://www.linguabase.org/words-with-spaces.html
66•gligierko•1d ago•102 comments

Cell Service for the Fairly Paranoid

https://www.cape.co/
97•0xWTF•11h ago•97 comments

30 Years of Decompilation and the Unsolved Structuring Problem: Part 1 (2024)

https://mahaloz.re/dec-history-pt1
4•userbinator•3d ago•0 comments

Sovereignty in a System Prompt

https://pop.rdi.sh/sovereignty-in-a-system-prompt/
60•0x5FC3•20h ago•35 comments

Anthropic Drops Flagship Safety Pledge

https://time.com/7380854/exclusive-anthropic-drops-flagship-safety-pledge/
320•cwwc•9h ago•142 comments

Corgi Labs (YC W23) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/corgi-labs/jobs/ZiEIf7a-founders-associate
1•leastsquares•9h ago

Hugging Face Skills

https://github.com/huggingface/skills
170•armcat•16h ago•47 comments

We installed a single turnstile to feel secure

https://idiallo.com/blog/installed-single-turnstile-for-security-theater
338•firefoxd•2d ago•165 comments

Aesthetics of single threading

https://ta.fo/aesthetics-of-single-threading/
84•todsacerdoti•3d ago•21 comments

Stripe valued at $159B, 2025 annual letter

https://stripe.com/newsroom/news/stripe-2025-update
210•jez•19h ago•217 comments

Looks like it is happening

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=15500
179•jjgreen•13h ago•143 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•9mo ago

Comments

wahern•9mo ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•9mo ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•9mo ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•9mo ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•9mo ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•9mo ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•9mo ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•9mo ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•9mo ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•9mo ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•9mo ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•9mo ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•9mo ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•9mo ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.