frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: SQL-tap – Real-time SQL traffic viewer for PostgreSQL and MySQL

https://github.com/mickamy/sql-tap
84•mickamy•4h ago•14 comments

Zig – io_uring and Grand Central Dispatch std.Io implementations landed

https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-02-13
6•Retro_Dev•28m ago•0 comments

The Three Year Myth

https://green.spacedino.net/the-three-year-myth/
30•surprisetalk•3d ago•12 comments

Show HN: I spent 3 years reverse-engineering a 40 yo stock market sim from 1986

https://www.wallstreetraider.com/story.html
231•benstopics•4d ago•72 comments

Understanding the Go Compiler: The Linker

https://internals-for-interns.com/posts/the-go-linker/
56•valyala•5d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Data Engineering Book – An open source, community-driven guide

https://github.com/datascale-ai/data_engineering_book/blob/main/README_en.md
153•xx123122•11h ago•13 comments

Common Lisp Screenshots: today's CL applications in action

http://www.lisp-screenshots.org
99•_emacsomancer_•2d ago•32 comments

Cogram (YC W22) – Hiring former technical founders

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/cogram/jobs/LDTrViN-ex-technical-founder-product-engineer
1•ricwo•1h ago

GPT-5.2 derives a new result in theoretical physics

https://openai.com/index/new-result-theoretical-physics/
462•davidbarker•13h ago•319 comments

Backblaze Drive Stats for 2025

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-2025/
59•Brajeshwar•4h ago•9 comments

Building a TUI is easy now

https://hatchet.run/blog/tuis-are-easy-now
213•abelanger•14h ago•156 comments

Font Rendering from First Principles

https://mccloskeybr.com/articles/font_rendering.html
144•krapp•6d ago•24 comments

How the Little Guy Moved

https://animationobsessive.substack.com/p/how-the-little-guy-moved
6•zdw•4d ago•0 comments

Gradient.horse

https://gradient.horse
244•microflash•4d ago•49 comments

Babylon 5 is now free to watch on YouTube

https://cordcuttersnews.com/babylon-5-is-now-free-to-watch-on-youtube/
157•walterbell•1d ago•83 comments

The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

https://www.politico.eu/article/tiktok-meta-facebook-instagram-brussels-kill-infinite-scrolling/
549•danso•11h ago•548 comments

Adventures in Neural Rendering

https://interplayoflight.wordpress.com/2026/02/10/adventures-in-neural-rendering/
26•ingve•3d ago•1 comments

NPMX – a fast, modern browser for the NPM registry

https://npmx.dev
86•slymax•6h ago•41 comments

gRPC: From service definition to wire format

https://kreya.app/blog/grpc-deep-dive/
121•latonz•4d ago•18 comments

Monosketch

https://monosketch.io/
763•penguin_booze•20h ago•133 comments

An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – More Things Have Happened

https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me-part-2/
400•scottshambaugh•8h ago•201 comments

Fix the iOS keyboard before the timer hits zero or I'm switching back to Android

https://ios-countdown.win/
1434•ozzyphantom•18h ago•703 comments

Advanced Aerial Robotics Made Simple

https://www.drehmflight.com
127•jacquesm•5d ago•10 comments

WolfSSL sucks too, so now what?

https://blog.feld.me/posts/2026/02/wolfssl-sucks-too/
111•thomasjb•22h ago•91 comments

CSS-Doodle

https://css-doodle.com/
157•dsego•1d ago•16 comments

How did the Maya survive?

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/12/apocalypse-no-how-almost-everything-we-thought-we-kn...
128•speckx•18h ago•104 comments

Faster Than Dijkstra?

https://systemsapproach.org/2026/02/09/faster-than-dijkstra/
125•drbruced•4d ago•73 comments

The wonder of modern drywall

https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/the-wonder-of-modern-drywall
103•jger15•1d ago•163 comments

I'm not worried about AI job loss

https://davidoks.blog/p/why-im-not-worried-about-ai-job-loss
251•ezekg•13h ago•415 comments

OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

https://theconversation.com/openai-has-deleted-the-word-safely-from-its-mission-and-its-new-struc...
496•DamnInteresting•10h ago•251 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•9mo ago

Comments

wahern•9mo ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•9mo ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•9mo ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•9mo ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•9mo ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•9mo ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•9mo ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•9mo ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•9mo ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•9mo ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•9mo ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•9mo ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•9mo ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•9mo ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.