frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

GhostLock, a stack-UAF that has existed in all Linux distributions for 15 years

https://nebusec.ai/research/ionstack-part-2/
153•ranger_danger•4d ago•55 comments

Cyberpunk Comics, Manga and Graphic Novels

https://shellzine.net/cyberpunk-comics/
121•zdw•5h ago•27 comments

Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles

222•levkk•3h ago•148 comments

Tiny Emulators

https://floooh.github.io/tiny8bit-preview/index.html
180•naves•8h ago•11 comments

So you want to learn physics (second edition, 2021)

https://www.susanrigetti.com/physics
134•azhenley•5d ago•19 comments

Designing and assembling my first PCB

https://vilkeliskis.com/b/2026/0711.html
72•tadasv•5h ago•26 comments

First look at Quest, the final ship of Antarctic explorer Shackleton

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/quest-shipwreck-expedition-images-9.7262229
13•curmudgeon22•4d ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (July 2026)

100•david927•7h ago•299 comments

Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7k

https://systima.ai/blog/claude-code-vs-opencode-token-overhead
506•systima•10h ago•283 comments

LARP – Revenue infrastructure for serious founders

https://www.larp.website/
186•BerislavLopac•11h ago•40 comments

Migrating a production AI agent to GPT-5.6: 2.2x faster, 27% cheaper

https://ploy.ai/blog/migrating-a-production-ai-agent-to-gpt-5-6
161•brryant•11h ago•61 comments

Kode Dot Programmable pocket device for makers, pentesters and geeks

https://kode.diy
56•iNic•7h ago•14 comments

How we can reduce traffic congestion

https://research.google/blog/the-power-of-collaboration-how-we-can-reduce-traffic-congestion/
101•raahelb•13h ago•124 comments

Why write code in 2026

https://softwaredoug.com/blog/2026/07/09/write-code
128•softwaredoug•2d ago•170 comments

I Learned to Read Again

https://substack.magazinenongrata.com/p/how-i-learned-to-read-again
118•georgex7•10h ago•48 comments

Count Binface

https://countbinface.com
47•mooreds•42m ago•11 comments

Why Vanilla JavaScript

https://guseyn.com/html/posts/why-vanilla-js.html
100•guseyn•5h ago•56 comments

Vint Cerf, “father of the Internet”, is retiring

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/30/the-father-of-the-internet-is-finally-retiring/
290•compiler-guy•3d ago•166 comments

Automation Without Understanding

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06377
105•root-parent•11h ago•45 comments

Modernizing Property Tax Assessments in Allegheny County

https://www.prohousingpgh.org/blog/new-report-modernizing-property-tax-assessments-in-allegheny-c...
32•mooreds•2h ago•18 comments

Profiling the "Abundance" housing bottleneck with real data

https://laxmena.com/same-capacity-less-throughput
34•laxmena•6h ago•25 comments

Are you telling me a readonly property is wrecking my performance?

https://shub.club/writings/2026/july/check-your-scrollheight/
3•forthwall•3d ago•3 comments

The four horsemen behind Postgres outages

https://malisper.me/the-four-horsemen-behind-thousands-of-postgres-outages/
26•craigkerstiens•3d ago•11 comments

Against Usefulness

https://www.motivenotes.ai/p/against-usefulness
96•supo•10h ago•24 comments

Flash-MSA: Accelerating Million-Token Training with Sparse Attention Kernels

https://nanduruganesh.github.io/flash-msa/
31•rawsh•7h ago•1 comments

Mechanistic interpretability researchers applying causality theory to LLMs

https://cacm.acm.org/news/can-we-understand-how-large-language-models-reason/
92•adunk•10h ago•66 comments

I love LLMs, I hate hype

https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/12/i-love-llms.html
366•therepanic•10h ago•231 comments

Calculix: A Free Software Three-Dimensional Structural Finite Element Program

https://www.calculix.de/
10•joebig•3d ago•1 comments

What xAI's Grok build CLI sends to xAI: A wire-level analysis

https://gist.github.com/cereblab/dc9a40bc26120f4540e4e09b75ffb547
426•jhoho•1d ago•163 comments

Ghostel.el: Terminal emulator powered by libghostty

https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/
268•signa11•19h ago•52 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•1y ago

Comments

wahern•1y ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•1y ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•1y ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•1y ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•1y ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•1y ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•1y ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•1y ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•1y ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•1y ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•1y ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•1y ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•1y ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•1y ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.