frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Zoo of Array Languages

https://ktye.github.io/
48•mpweiher•1h ago•10 comments

Why is everything so scalable?

https://www.stavros.io/posts/why-is-everything-so-scalable/
85•kunley•5d ago•40 comments

PyreFly: Python type checker and language server in Rust

https://pyrefly.org/?featured_on=talkpython
8•brianzelip•17m ago•1 comments

Don’t Look Up: Sensitive internal links in the clear on GEO satellites [pdf]

https://satcom.sysnet.ucsd.edu/docs/dontlookup_ccs25_fullpaper.pdf
373•dweekly•11h ago•96 comments

NanoChat – The best ChatGPT that $100 can buy

https://github.com/karpathy/nanochat
1285•huseyinkeles•21h ago•256 comments

Ultrasound is ushering a new era of surgery-free cancer treatment

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251007-how-ultrasound-is-ushering-a-new-era-of-surgery-free-...
75•1659447091•6d ago•25 comments

KDE celebrates the 29th birthday and kicks off the yearly fundraiser

https://kde.org/fundraisers/yearend2025/
92•jrepinc•2h ago•38 comments

Kyber (YC W23) Is Hiring an Enterprise AE

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/kyber/jobs/BQRRSrZ-enterprise-account-executive-ae
1•asontha•49m ago

Dutch government takes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch-government-takes-control-of-chinese-owned-chipmaker-nexperi...
542•piskov•1d ago•490 comments

Why study programming languages (2022)

https://people.csail.mit.edu/rachit/post/why-study-programming-languages/
108•bhasi•7h ago•66 comments

Palisades Fire suspect's ChatGPT history to be used as evidence

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/chatgpt-palisades-fire-suspect-1235443216/
146•quuxplusone•5d ago•102 comments

No science, no startups: The innovation engine we're switching off

https://steveblank.com/2025/10/13/no-science-no-startups-the-unseen-engine-were-switching-off/
555•chmaynard•23h ago•370 comments

Show HN: CSS Extras

https://github.com/sindresorhus/css-extras
29•mofle•6d ago•10 comments

Copy-and-Patch: A Copy-and-Patch Tutorial

https://transactional.blog/copy-and-patch/tutorial
59•todsacerdoti•7h ago•8 comments

America is getting an AI gold rush instead of a factory boom

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/10/13/manufacturing-artificial-intelligence/
268•voxleone•22h ago•323 comments

First device based on 'optical thermodynamics' can route light without switches

https://phys.org/news/2025-10-device-based-optical-thermodynamics-route.html
149•rbanffy•5d ago•21 comments

Show HN: SQLite Online – 11 years of solo development, 11K daily users

https://sqliteonline.com/
404•sqliteonline•1d ago•130 comments

Modern iOS Security Features – A Deep Dive into SPTM, TXM, and Exclaves

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09272
190•todsacerdoti•18h ago•10 comments

Smartphones and being present

https://herman.bearblog.dev/being-present/
303•articsputnik•22h ago•196 comments

DDoS Botnet Aisuru Blankets US ISPs in Record DDoS

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/10/ddos-botnet-aisuru-blankets-us-isps-in-record-ddos/
133•JumpCrisscross•13h ago•98 comments

2025 Q3 Sardines

https://draftcorgi.substack.com/p/2025-q3-recommendations
5•surprisetalk•5d ago•0 comments

JIT: So you want to be faster than an interpreter on modern CPUs

https://www.pinaraf.info/2025/10/jit-so-you-want-to-be-faster-than-an-interpreter-on-modern-cpus/
141•pinaraf•1d ago•34 comments

Sony PlayStation 2 fixing frenzy

https://retrohax.net/sony-playstation-2-fixing-frenzy/
138•ibobev•13h ago•77 comments

Why did containers happen?

https://buttondown.com/justincormack/archive/ignore-previous-directions-8-devopsdays/
143•todsacerdoti•1d ago•179 comments

Why the push for Agentic when models can barely follow a simple instruction?

https://forum.cursor.com/t/why-the-push-for-agentic-when-models-can-barely-follow-a-single-simple...
191•fork-bomber•5h ago•201 comments

America's future could hinge on whether AI slightly disappoints

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/americas-future-could-hinge-on-whether
159•jxmorris12•19h ago•178 comments

Strudel REPL – a music live coding environment living in the browser

https://strudel.cc
178•birdculture•18h ago•35 comments

LLMs are getting better at character-level text manipulation

https://blog.burkert.me/posts/llm_evolution_character_manipulation/
108•curioussquirrel•17h ago•75 comments

Passt – Plug a Simple Socket Transport

https://passt.top/passt/about/
31•zdw•1w ago•3 comments

JSON River – Parse JSON incrementally as it streams in

https://github.com/rictic/jsonriver
210•rickcarlino•5d ago•83 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•5mo ago

Comments

wahern•5mo ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•5mo ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•5mo ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•5mo ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•5mo ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•5mo ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•5mo ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•5mo ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•5mo ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•5mo ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•5mo ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•5mo ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•5mo ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•5mo ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.