frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

hdiutil is deprecated in macOS 27 Golden Gate

https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/8/7.html
68•zdw•1h ago•15 comments

NetBSD and My Life (2005)

https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2005/09/10/0000.html
31•gnyeki•1h ago•1 comments

Scrap

https://twitter.com/moxie/status/2091218652133732491
90•tosh•2h ago•17 comments

ElevenLabs, TwelveLabs, ThirteenLabs

https://quantumi.sh/public/labs.html
226•jemoka•5h ago•74 comments

Hister – A private, full content search index that you control

https://hister.org/
105•auraham•4d ago•39 comments

A Friendly Introduction to Racket

https://geometridae.bearblog.dev/a-friendly-introduction-to-racket/
102•signa11•6h ago•39 comments

typ.ing

https://typ.ing/
78•bookofjoe•4d ago•27 comments

Show HN: Make your logo extra bright on HDR screens

https://www.soverybright.com/
10•telecuda•1h ago•4 comments

How a Texas student blew the whistle on a rogue AI hacking attempt

https://www.reuters.com/world/how-texas-student-blew-whistle-rogue-ai-hacking-attempt-2026-08-20/
49•olalonde•1d ago•3 comments

RF Cafe

https://www.rfcafe.com/
69•gregsadetsky•3d ago•9 comments

ATProto spaces: A new extension to ATProto that enables non-public data

https://atproto.com/blog/atproto-spaces-alpha
45•grappler•1d ago•7 comments

Why your local LLM feels dumber than it is

https://forum.level1techs.com/t/why-your-local-llm-feels-dumber-than-it-is/253917
9•felineflock•1h ago•0 comments

Munder Difflin – Agent harness to run an office of your clones

https://munderdiffl.in/
226•simonpure•10h ago•102 comments

Guess which of these LLM outputs is watermarked

https://sgoedecke.github.io/watermark-quiz/
31•gfysfm•2d ago•35 comments

Canada will match US tariffs 'dollar for dollar' as trade talks break down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgvyy4x2mvo
243•tartoran•13h ago•886 comments

Why it might be time to rethink the human family tree

https://nautil.us/why-it-might-be-time-to-rethink-the-human-family-tree-1283985
29•Anon84•2d ago•17 comments

One night in Uzbekistan: Why was this one data point so influential?

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/08/20/we-couldnt-reproduce-their-findings-and-realize...
20•paulpauper•1d ago•2 comments

MiniageOS: "Dumbphone" Version of LineageOS

https://github.com/ofdryads/miniageOS
27•ashenke•2d ago•15 comments

Z80 – The 1970s Microprocessor Still Alive (2021)

https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/mi/2021/06/09623402/1yJTvlRLmhi
98•asdefghyk•10h ago•49 comments

Mythic's analog compute-in-memory architecture

https://www.mythic.ai
28•janandonly•3d ago•3 comments

New MCP Roadmap

https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/mcp-roadmap/
147•pentagrama•6h ago•112 comments

Belgian car salesman becomes prince after DNA test proves royal parentage

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/22/europe/prince-belgium-secret-son-scli-intl
72•MilnerRoute•3h ago•45 comments

The Creation of Abulafia

https://blog.veitheller.de/abulafia.html
18•saulpw•23h ago•2 comments

Anthropic appears to be A/B testing reduced effort levels in Claude Code

https://twitter.com/argofowl/status/2091150597374537729
89•matthieu_bl•3h ago•90 comments

Show HN: terminal-code – VS Code inside the terminal

https://terminal-code.com
28•robpruzan•3d ago•9 comments

Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM

https://rust-glancer.github.io/blog/hello-world/
378•matklad•1d ago•88 comments

Show HN: Anonymous age verification with passkey-powered encryption

https://loginwithone.com/
28•mikeysight•3d ago•14 comments

What's in a PowerPoint File?

https://editide.com/blog/what-is-a-pptx-file/
28•danielochoa0620•3d ago•18 comments

Show HN: Rotation via Double Reflection

https://static.laszlokorte.de/rotor-reflect/
45•laszlokorte•1d ago•9 comments

Ameliorate

https://ameliorate.app/
71•hakkikonu•1d ago•19 comments
Open in hackernews

Detecting if an expression is constant in C

https://nrk.neocities.org/articles/c-constexpr-macro#detecting-if-an-expression-is-constant-in-c
49•signa11•1y ago

Comments

wahern•1y ago
> This works. But both gcc and clang warn about the enum being anonymous... even though that's exactly what I wanted to do. And this cannot be silenced with #pragma since it's a macro, so the warning occurs at the location where the macro is invoked.

You can use _Pragma instead of #pragma. E.g.

  #define C(x) ( \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvisibility\"") \
    (x) + 0*sizeof(void (*)(enum { tmp = (int)(x) })) \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
  )
EDIT: Alas, GCC is a little pickier about where _Pragma is allowed so you may need to use a statement expression. Also, it seems GCC 14 doesn't have a -W switch that will disable the anonymous enum warning.
pjc50•1y ago
It's remarkable that people will say that doing this kind of thing is better than learning a language which actually lets you enforce this with the type system.

(or even just insist that users use the version of the language which supports "constexpr"!)

oguz-ismail•1y ago
What language is that? Is it available everywhere (everywhere) C is?
mitthrowaway2•1y ago
Indeed, usually if I'm using C these days it's because I only have access to a c compiler for my target platform, or because I'm modifying an existing C codebase.
uecker•1y ago
I do not think anybody said this. The point is that these macros work for early versions of C. If you need to support early versions of C, learning another language is not a solution. If you don't have to, you can use C23's constexpr.
trealira•1y ago
C used to seem like a beautiful and simple language to me, but as I used it and learned more about it, it seemed more complex under the surface, and kind of janky as well. It's just utilitarian.
wat10000•1y ago
Learning such a language doesn’t mean I can use it.
o11c•1y ago
The problem is that no such language exists.

There are many languages that provide one particular feature that C doesn't provide, but they do this at the cost of excluding numerous other features that C widely relies on.

kjs3•1y ago
"I have no idea what problem you're trying to solve, what the constraints are, what the use cases might be, what tools are available on the platform, what the job or regulations require, what the skillsets of the people involved are, what the timeline is...but I'm absolutely, unshakably certain that I have a magic bullet that will make all your problems go away."

FTFY.

sleirsgoevy•1y ago
The Linux kernel has even a way to determine whether the expression is compile-time, WITHOUT aborting compilation in either case.

The trick is this (copied vebratim from Linux):

#define __is_constexpr(x) (sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))

Explanation: if x is a constant expression, then multiplying it by zero yields a constant 0, and casting a constant 0 to void* makes a null pointer constant. And the ternary expression, if one of its sides is a null pointer constant, collapses to the type of the other side (thus the type of the returned pointer will be int*, and the sizeof will match). And if x was not constant, then the lefthand side would not be considered a null pointer constant by type inference, the type of the ternary expression will be void*, and the sizeof check will not match.

With a few more clever tricks, it's even possible to implement a compile-time "type ternary expression", like this: TYPE_IF(2 * 2 == 4, int, long). This is left as an exercise for the reader.

amelius•1y ago
This reminds me of the days when Boost was a thing. It was full of tricks like this.
usrnm•1y ago
It still is a thing, though.
cperciva•1y ago
With a few more clever tricks...

I did this with my PARSENUM macro (https://github.com/Tarsnap/libcperciva/blob/master/util/pars...) to parse strings into floating-point, unsigned integer, or signed integer types (and check bounds) using a single interface.

bobbyi•1y ago
I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

> The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.