Who can take em seriously when cursor has privacy mode while copilot implicitly trains AI on copilot interactions with customers’ private repo code unless you get some enterprise tier of service?
The core of GitHub is about version control, including private repos, the fact they would violate that trust relationship just to chase AI capabilities means they’ve totally lost the plot as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe Copilot is a nice toy for open source projects or noobs working on private codebases who don’t take 5 minutes to read their website, but cursor just seems way ahead in terms of basic respect for customers
voxic11•7h ago
> copilot implicitly trains AI on copilot interactions with customers’ private repo code unless you get some enterprise tier of service?
Seems incorrect to me, from the copilot individual license docs:
> By default, GitHub, its affiliates, and third parties will not use your data, including prompts, suggestions, and code snippets, for AI model training. This is reflected in your personal settings for GitHub Copilot and cannot be enabled.
Are you sure about that? I pay $10 for Copilot, that's it, no other subscription to GitHub, and it says my data is not used for training:
Allow GitHub to use my data for product improvements: Unchecked
Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training: Disabled
jasonthorsness•8h ago
Instead of adding a TODO or filing a ticket to find again later agent mode/background tasks/agents let you just spin off the actual work for doing the task. So you can keep your focus on the main thing you are working on but have something else go fix the bug you noticed, write the missing test, or even just fix a spelling mistake in a comment. It improves code quality by lowering effort required to prepare a change and work through lint/CI etc. In this way it’s great even though it can’t handle much complexity yet.
ComplexSystems•8h ago
I have been using this with mostly decent results. I am curious how it compares to other IDEs though - Cursor, Windsurf, Roocode, etc. Any thoughts?
CharlesW•7h ago
I personally like Windsurf a bit more than Cursor, but recently I've been far more productive using Claude Code with an IDE than I was using a VSC-derived AIDE.
runekaagaard•7h ago
My sweet spot at the moment is Claude Desktop with mcp servers for editing and aider --watch for quick fixes. Claude Code uses way, way, way too many tokens on the large project i work most on.
himeexcelanta•7h ago
Get one of the max plans! It pays for itself.
CharlesW•7h ago
> Claude Code uses way, way, way too many tokens on the large project i work most on.
That's a very fair critique, and it makes the pay-as-you-go pricing model (vs. one of their subscription options) a completely unrealistic option for doing anything serious with Claude Code.
dist-epoch•7h ago
You don't get paid for programming?
recursinging•7h ago
This is cool, but still lagging behind VS Code. I still can't the enterprise/premium models in VS (I can in VS Code) so no Claude 4 Sonnet. I even went so far as to try some C# dev in VS Code just to see how the Claude 4 deals with C# - Meh. In comparison, I just wrapped up a C++ microcontroller project in VS Code using agent mode and it was amazing. In retrospect I recognize that Claude will resort to grep and other text based tools. This works well when all the sources are included, less so with Nuget packages. If the models can aim better at intellisense tooling, they'd be more effective. IMO Copilot agents in VS are not quite there, but not far off.
bionhoward•8h ago
The core of GitHub is about version control, including private repos, the fact they would violate that trust relationship just to chase AI capabilities means they’ve totally lost the plot as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe Copilot is a nice toy for open source projects or noobs working on private codebases who don’t take 5 minutes to read their website, but cursor just seems way ahead in terms of basic respect for customers
voxic11•7h ago
Seems incorrect to me, from the copilot individual license docs:
> By default, GitHub, its affiliates, and third parties will not use your data, including prompts, suggestions, and code snippets, for AI model training. This is reflected in your personal settings for GitHub Copilot and cannot be enabled.
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/managing...
dist-epoch•7h ago
Allow GitHub to use my data for product improvements: Unchecked
Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training: Disabled