https://writewithharper.com/docs/rules
https://github.com/Automattic/harper/blob/0c04291bfec25d0e93...
"PointIsMoot" => (
["your point is mute"],
["your point is moot"],
"Did you mean `your point is moot`?",
"Typo: `moot` (meaning debatable) is correct rather than `mute`."
),That it doesn't use LLMs is its advantage, it runs in under 10ms and can be easily embedded in software and still provide useful grammar checking even if it's not exhaustive
https://writewithharper.com/docs/integrations/language-serve...
Not that I think LLM is always better, but it would be interesting to compare these two approaches.
No errors detected. So this needs a lot of rule contributions to get to Grammarly level.
Is there any reason why there is no firefox extension?
Passes.
For reference: https://youtu.be/w-R_Rak8Tys?si=h3zFCq2kyzYNRXBI
I.e. if you write an "MISTAEK" and then you scroll the highlight follows me around the page
I tried with the following phrase -- "This should can't logic be done me." --
No errors.
it is of course mostly very good at it, but it's very far from "trustworthy", and it tends to mirror mistakes you make.
Even in British I'm not sure how widely they actually use it - do they say "I've a car" and "I haven't a car"?
Otherwise, it's great work. There should be an option to import/export the correction rules though.
mika6996•6h ago
ognarb•3h ago