Davenports and kettle drums
And swallowtail coats
Tablecloths and patent leather shoes
Bathing suits and bowling balls
And clarinets and rings
And all this radio really needs is a fuse
A tinker, a tailor, a soldier's things
His rifle, his boots full of rocks
And this one is for bravery and this one is for me
And everything's a dollar in this box
Cuff links and hubcaps
Trophies and paperbacks
It's good transportation
But the brakes aren't so hot
Neckties and boxing gloves
This jackknife is rusted
You can pound that dent out on the hood
A tinker or tailor, a soldier's things
His rifle, his boots full of rocks
Oh, and this one is for bravery, oh, and this one is for me
And everything's a dollar in this box
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNwC8ETa0pghttps://www.dictionary.com/browse/sonder https://medium.com/etch-to-their-own/dustsceawung-866aff795a...
The article just neglects to mention this directly.
The model seems to make a lot of assumptions based on such a small fragment.
this could be said about a shocking amount of historical study
This is interesting wording. I have a strong urge toward saying either of two other options:
- "The camp was established by the 10th Legion, who were stationed in the area between..." [The Legion is a collection of people]
- "The camp was established by the 10th Legion, which was stationed in the area between..." [The Legion is not a person]
I have difficulty interpreting the Legion as a single person, though. Does the wording in the article work for other people?
---
As to the item itself, I find it a little odd to call it a "purse", since it's reconstructed as a solid metal object. That sounds inconvenient and uncomfortable at best.
kaonwarb•7mo ago
andrewflnr•7mo ago
hoseja•7mo ago
is_true•7mo ago
andrewflnr•7mo ago