https://www.printables.com/model/1251667-mechanical-nand-uni...
The combination of those two make it difficult to even see what you’ve made.
I need to catch up on my guerilla marketing classes.
Unless that has changed, that dynamic places this behind most other CLI-based IRC clients, including some that are decades old.
P.S. Keep up the great work! The world needs more IRC.
Or is this about to have break-line aware copy in panes (such as in tmux)?
Pasting works fine.
irc.rekt.network:6697 channels: #rekt,#nightride TLS true
Also checkout the Nightride cli at https://github.com/babycommando/nightride-cli
And, well, I'll just open the radio playlist with mocp.
Whatever cool people there were have either died or saw the writing on the wall as IRC slowly faded into obscurity with the introduction of better (debatable) chat systems, especially these days with things like Discord or Slack that do every IRC does in some capacity and more, perhaps most importantly simply making chat accessible in a safe way to less technically savvy users. That genie is kinda out of the bottle, so getting anyone aside from grumpy old guard to use IRC versus the modern alternatives is pretty much impossible. As a result, and aside from the bots doing things like letting me play IdleRPG or whatever, you're more likely to encounter people like me who don't feel like we fit in anywhere or conspiracy theorists, returning to IRC the way Romero's zombies wandered to the shopping mall because they had a vague memory of it from a former life.
Just join Libera's #politics. Full-on leftist politics where another opinion is not allowed
Just a lot of ghost towns in between them.
On the ghosts towns, with FIDO/DOVE you get far less posts, but every group has some content. With Usenet, you either have loaded technical groups (and some less tech bound ones such as misc.internet.discuss) plus some niche hobbies (chess, classical music...) except modern PC gaming. The rest, as you said... shadows from better places.
For postmodern bullshiters, hauntology it's never a thing on open services. There's always some people having fun there. Former propietary or web bound services are dead, forgotten and lost. Such as MySpace, Digg, unpatched MSN-AOL-ICQ, the Spanish slashdot clone (Barrapunto), Libertonia (es.comp.os.linux related slashdot clone) and so on.
However TUI IRC clients already exist in the form of venerable weechat, and all the other examples people already gave in the thread.
So I ask what is the purpose? Learning? Sure I can see that, but why is a project with 5 commits being presented on HN as some kind of innovative application? Trustworthy projects need tenure and they need humility. This has neither.
I understand I'm being overly negative here, and that there's at least 60 people disagreeing with me, but tell me why is this project interesting for you?
Will this project end up as a small weekend project with only a few users? Possibly, but that isn't a reason not to create something and share what it with people.
There's a ton a great software that started to solve a problem that the developer had, that eventually hit pretty mainstream usage.
Aren't this primarily client- and server-related issues and not something that is an issue with the protocol itself?
Slack won anyway for the same reasons most centralised, commercial, closed sourced products often win: less fragmentation, more marketing, stronger network effects, simpler onboarding for normies, richer integrations, and most importantly, an enterprise sales team that actually showers
> Internet Relay Chat Chat
GCUMstlyHarmls•6mo ago
babycommando•6mo ago